Bocedi, Greta and Travis, Justin M. J. 2016. Models of Dispersal Evolution Highlight Several Important Issues in Evolutionary and Ecological Modeling. The American Naturalist, Vol. 187, Issue. 1, p. 143.
Ho, Wei-Chin and Zhang, Jianzhi 2016. Adaptive Genetic Robustness ofEscherichia coliMetabolic Fluxes. Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol. 33, Issue. 5, p. 1164.
Laarits, T. Bordalo, P. and Lemos, B. 2016. Genes under weaker stabilizing selection increase network evolvability and rapid regulatory adaptation to an environmental shift. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 29, Issue. 8, p. 1602.
Collet, Julie M. Blows, Mark W. and McGuigan, Katrina 2015. Transcriptome-wide effects of sexual selection on the fate of new mutations. Evolution, Vol. 69, Issue. 11, p. 2905.
Grabowski, Mark and Roseman, Charles C. 2015. Complex and changing patterns of natural selection explain the evolution of the human hip. Journal of Human Evolution, Vol. 85, p. 94.
Hodgins-Davis, Andrea Rice, Daniel P. and Townsend, Jeffrey P. 2015. Gene Expression Evolves under a House-of-Cards Model of Stabilizing Selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution, Vol. 32, Issue. 8, p. 2130.
Peterson, Megan L. and Kay, Kathleen M. 2015. Mating System Plasticity Promotes Persistence and Adaptation of Colonizing Populations of Hermaphroditic Angiosperms. The American Naturalist, Vol. 185, Issue. 1, p. 28.
Kopp, Michael and Matuszewski, Sebastian 2014. Rapid evolution of quantitative traits: theoretical perspectives. Evolutionary Applications, Vol. 7, Issue. 1, p. 169.
BASKETT, MARISSA L. and WAPLES, ROBIN S. 2013. Evaluating Alternative Strategies for Minimizing Unintended Fitness Consequences of Cultured Individuals on Wild Populations. Conservation Biology, Vol. 27, Issue. 1, p. 83.
Casellas, Joaquim Esquivelzeta, Cecilia and Legarra, Andrés 2013. Short communication: Accounting for new mutations in genomic prediction models. Journal of Dairy Science, Vol. 96, Issue. 8, p. 5398.
Houle, David and Fierst, Janna 2013. PROPERTIES OF SPONTANEOUS MUTATIONAL VARIANCE AND COVARIANCE FOR WING SIZE AND SHAPE INDROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Evolution, Vol. 67, Issue. 4, p. 1116.
Le Rouzic, Arnaud Álvarez-Castro, José M. and Hansen, Thomas F. 2013. The Evolution of Canalization and Evolvability in Stable and Fluctuating Environments. Evolutionary Biology, Vol. 40, Issue. 3, p. 317.
Richardson, Joshua B. Uppendahl, Locke D. Traficante, Maria K. Levy, Sasha F. Siegal, Mark L. and Petrov, Dmitri A. 2013. Histone Variant HTZ1 Shows Extensive Epistasis with, but Does Not Increase Robustness to, New Mutations. PLoS Genetics, Vol. 9, Issue. 8, p. e1003733.
Davey Smith, George 2012. Epigenesis for epidemiologists: does evo-devo have implications for population health research and practice?. International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 41, Issue. 1, p. 236.
Gruber, Jonathan D. Vogel, Kara Kalay, Gizem Wittkopp, Patricia J. and Akey, Joshua M. 2012. Contrasting Properties of Gene-Specific Regulatory, Coding, and Copy Number Mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Frequency, Effects, and Dominance. PLoS Genetics, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. e1002497.
Relton, Caroline L and Davey Smith, George 2012. Two-step epigenetic Mendelian randomization: a strategy for establishing the causal role of epigenetic processes in pathways to disease. International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 41, Issue. 1, p. 161.
Weaver, Timothy D. 2012. Did a discrete event 200,000–100,000 years ago produce modern humans?. Journal of Human Evolution, Vol. 63, Issue. 1, p. 121.
McGuigan, Katrina Petfield, Donna and Blows, Mark W. 2011. REDUCING MUTATION LOAD THROUGH SEXUAL SELECTION ON MALES. Evolution, Vol. 65, Issue. 10, p. 2816.
Whitacre, James M. 2011. Genetic and environment-induced pathways to innovation: on the possibility of a universal relationship between robustness and adaptation in complex biological systems. Evolutionary Ecology, Vol. 25, Issue. 5, p. 965.
BASKETT, MARISSA L. NISBET, ROGER M. KAPPEL, CARRIE V. MUMBY, PETER J. and GAINES, STEVEN D. 2010. Conservation management approaches to protecting the capacity for corals to respond to climate change: a theoretical comparison. Global Change Biology, Vol. 16, Issue. 4, p. 1229.
By application of the neutral model of phenotypic evolution, quantitative estimates of the rate of input of genetic variance by polygenic mutation can be extracted from divergence experiments as well as from the response of an inbred base population to selection. The analytical methods are illustrated through a survey of data on a diversity of organisms including Drosophila, Tribolium, mice, and several crop species. The mutational rate of introduction of genetic variance (Vm) scaled by the environmental variance (VE) is shown to vary between populations, species, and characters with a range of approximately 10−4 to 5 × 10−2. Vm/VE for Drosophila viability is somewhat below this range, while hybrid dysgenesis may temporarily inflate Vm/VE beyond 10−1. Potential sources of bias and error in the estimation of Vm are discussed, as are the practical implications of the observed limits to Vm/VE for projecting the long-term response to selection and for testing adaptational hypotheses.
This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.