Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Transformative change through Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): a conceptual framework and application to conservation agriculture in Malawi

  • Andrew Reid Bell (a1), Tim G. Benton (a2), Klaus Droppelmann (a3), Lawrence Mapemba (a4), Oliver Pierson (a5) and Patrick S. Ward (a6)...
Non-technical summary

A major challenge in addressing the loss of benefits and services provided by the natural environment is that it can be difficult to find ways for those who benefit from them to pay for their preservation. We examine one such context in Malawi, where erosion from soils disturbed by agriculture affects not only farmers’ incomes, but also damages aquatic habitat and inhibits the storage and hydropower potential of dams downstream. We demonstrate that payments from hydropower producers to farmers to maintain land cover and prevent erosion can have benefits for all parties involved.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Transformative change through Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): a conceptual framework and application to conservation agriculture in Malawi
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Transformative change through Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): a conceptual framework and application to conservation agriculture in Malawi
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Transformative change through Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): a conceptual framework and application to conservation agriculture in Malawi
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author
Author for correspondence: A. R. Bell, E-mail: ab6176@nyu.edu
References
Hide All
1.Dalin, C, Wada, Y, Kastner, T and Puma, MJ (2017) Groundwater depletion embedded in international food trade. Nature 543, 700704.
2.Graves, AR, Morris, J, Deeks, LK, Rickson, RJ, Kibblewhite, MG, Harris, JA, Farewell, TS and Truckle, I (2015) The total costs of soil degradation in England and Wales. Ecological Economics 119, 399413.
3.Newbold, T, Hudson, LN, Hill, SLL, Contu, S, Lysenko, I, Senior, RA, Börger, L, Bennett, DJ, Choimes, A, Collen, B, Day, J, De Palma, A, Díaz, S, Echeverria-Londoño, S, Edgar, MJ, Feldman, A, Garon, M, Harrison, MLK, Alhusseini, T, Ingram, DJ, Itescu, Y, Kattge, J, Kemp, V, Kirkpatrick, L, Kleyer, M, Correia, DLP, Martin, CD, Meiri, S, Novosolov, M, Pan, Y, Phillips, HRP, Purves, DW, Robinson, A, Simpson, J, Tuck, SL, Weiher, E, White, HJ, Ewers, RM, Mace, GM, Scharlemann, JPW and Purvis, A (2015) Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520, 4550.
4.Paulot, F and Jacob, DJ (2014) Hidden cost of U.S. agricultural exports: particulate matter from ammonia emissions. Environmental Science and Technology 48, 903908.
5.Wang, R, Dearing, JA, Langdon, PG, Zhang, E, Yang, X, Dakos, V and Scheffer, M (2012) Flickering gives early warning signals of a critical transition to a eutrophic lake state. Nature 492, 419422.
6.Zhang, K, Dearing, JA, Dawson, TP, Dong, X, Yang, X and Zhang, W (2015) Poverty alleviation strategies in eastern China lead to critical ecological dynamics. Science of the Total Environment 506–507, 164181.
7.Nguyen, TTL, Laratte, B, Guillaume, B and Hua, A (2016) Quantifying environmental externalities with a view to internalizing them in the price of products, using different monetization models. Resources Conservation and Recycling 109, 1323.
8.Gómez-Baggethun, E, de Groot, R, Lomas, PL and Montes, C (2010) The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecological Economics 69, 12091218.
9.Kemkes, RJ, Farley, J and Koliba, CJ (2010) Determining when payments are an effective policy approach to ecosystem service provision. Ecological Economics 69, 20692074.
10.Kerchner, C, Honzák, M, Kemkes, R, Richardson, A, Townsend, J and Rimmer, CC (2010) Designing spatially explicit incentive programs for habitat conservation: a case study of the Bicknell's thrush wintering grounds. Ecological Economics 69, 21082115.
11.Engel, S, Pagiola, S and Wunder, S (2008) Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecological Economics 65, 663674.
12.Goldman, RL, Thompson, BH and Daily, GC (2007) Institutional incentives for managing the landscape: inducing cooperation for the production of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 64, 333343.
13.Jack, BK, Kousky, C and Sims, KRE (2008) Designing payments for ecosystem services: lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 94659470.
14.Farley, J and Costanza, R (2010) Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global. Ecological Economics 69, 20602068.
15.Wunder, S (2015) Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 117, 234243.
16.Bennett, EM, Peterson, GD and Gordon, LJ (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters 12, 13941404.
17.German, RN, Thompson, CE and Benton, TG (2016) Relationships among multiple aspects of agriculture's environmental impact and productivity: a meta-analysis to guide sustainable agriculture. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 92(2), 716738.
18.Scheffer, M, Brock, W and Westley, F (2000) Socioeconomic mechanisms preventing optimum use of ecosystem services: an interdisciplinary theoretical analysis. Ecosystems 3, 451471.
19.Joshi, L (2011) A Community-based PES Scheme for Forest Preservation and Sediment Control in Kulekhani, Nepal. In Payment for Ecosystem Services and Food Policy. (ed. Ottaviani, D, Scialabba, N) pp. 198203. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations.
20.Pagiola, S, Glehn, HC and Von Taffarello, D (2013) Experiências de pagamentos por serviços ambientais no Brasil, Secretaria do Meio Ambiente / Coordenadoria de Biodiversidade e Recursos Naturais. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/548371468021548454/pdf/864940WP0P088000PORTUGUESE0PSAlivro.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2018.
21.Scopel, E, Triomphe, B, Affholder, F, Da Silva, FAM, Corbeels, M, Xavier, JHV, Lahmar, R, Recous, S, Bernoux, M, Blanchart, E, De Carvalho Mendes, I and De Tourdonnet, S (2013) Conservation agriculture cropping systems in temperate and tropical conditions, performances and impacts. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 33, 113130.
22.Arndt, C, Pauw, K and Thurlow, J (2014) The economywide impacts and risks of Malawi's farm input subsidy programme. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu//handle/169903. Accessed 11 May 2018.
23.Ngwira, AR, Aune, JB and Mkwinda, S (2012) On-farm evaluation of yield and economic benefit of short term maize legume intercropping systems under conservation agriculture in Malawi. Field Crop Research 132, 149157.
24.Chibwana, C, Fisher, M and Shively, G (2012) Cropland allocation effects of agricultural input subsidies in Malawi. World Development 40, 124133.
25.Shively, GE and Ricker-Gilbert, J (2013) Measuring the impacts of agricultural input subsidies in Sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from Malawi's Farm Input Subsidy Program Saharan Africa. Global Policy Research Institute Policy Briefs 1(1).
26.Franke, AC, van den Brand, GJ and Giller, KE (2014) Which farmers benefit most from sustainable intensification? An ex-ante impact assessment of expanding grain legume production in Malawi. European Journal of Agronomy 58, 2838.
27.Bell, A, Matthews, N and Zhang, W (2016) Opportunities for improved promotion of ecosystem services in agriculture under the Water-Energy-Food Nexus. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 6, 183191
28.Malawi. (2010) The Agriculture Sector Wide Approach (ASWAp): Malawi's prioritised and harmonised Agricultural Development Agenda. Lilongwe. http://www.ndr.mw:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1100. Accessed 11 May 2018.
29.Malawi. (2016) National Agriculture Policy 2016. Lilongwe, Malawi. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/NAP_Final_Signed.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2018.
30.Mango, N, Siziba, S and Makate, C (2017) The impact of adoption of conservation agriculture on smallholder farmers’ food security in semi-arid zones of southern Africa. Agriculture Food Security 6, 32.
31.Dougill, AJ, Whitfield, S, Stringer, LC, Vincent, K, Wood, BT, Chinseu, EL, Steward, P and Mkwambisi, DD (2017) Mainstreaming conservation agriculture in Malawi: knowledge gaps and institutional barriers. Journal of Environmental Management 195, 2534.
32.Brown, B, Nuberg, I and Llewellyn, R (2017) Stepwise frameworks for understanding the utilisation of conservation agriculture in Africa. Agricultural Systems 153, 1122.
33.Ndah, HT, Schuler, J, Uthes, S, Zander, P, Traore, K, Gama, M-S, Nyagumbo, I, Triomphe, B, Sieber, S and Corbeels, M (2014) Adoption potential of conservation agriculture practices in sub-Saharan Africa: results from five case studies. Environmental Management 53, 620635.
34.Parkhurst, GM and Shogren, JF (2008) Smart subsidies for conservation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90, 11921200.
35.Ward, PS, Bell, AR, Parkhurst, GM and Droppelmann, K (2016) Heterogeneous preferences and the effects of incentives in promoting conservation agriculture in Malawi. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 222, 6779.
36.Araya, T, Cornelis, WM, Nyssen, J, Govaerts, B, Bauer, H, Gebreegziabher, T, Oicha, T, Raes, D, Sayre, KD, Haile, M and Deckers, J (2011) Effects of conservation agriculture on runoff, soil loss and crop yield under rainfed conditions in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. Soil Use Management 27, 404414.
37.Mchunu, CN, Lorentz, S, Jewitt, J, Manson, A and Chaplot, V (2011) No-till impact on soil and soil organic carbon erosion under crop residue scarcity in Africa. Soil Science Society of America Journal 75, 15031512.
38.Corbeels, M, de Graaff, J, Ndah, TH, Penot, E, Baudron, F, Naudin, K, Andrieu, N, Chirat, G, Schuler, J, Nyagumbo, I, Rusinamhodzi, L, Traore, K, Mzoba, HD and Adolwa, IS (2014) Understanding the impact and adoption of conservation agriculture in Africa: a multi-scale analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 187, 155170.
39.Millennium Challenge Corporation – Malawi. (2017) Power Sector Reform Project – Indicator Tracking Table. Lilongwe.
40.Pannell, DJ, Llewellyn, RS and Corbeels, M (2014) The farm-level economics of conservation agriculture for resource-poor farmers. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 187, 5264.
41.Pannell, DJ, Marshall, GR, Barr, N and Curtis, A, Vanclay, F and Wilkinson, R (2006) Understanding and promoting adoption of conservation practices by rural landholders. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 1407.
42.Pagiola, S, Honey-Rosés, J and Freire-González, J (2016) Evaluation of the permanence of land use change induced by payments for environmental services in Quindío, Colombia. PLoS One 11, 118.
43.Börner, J, Baylis, K, Corbera, E, Ezzine-de-Blas, D, Honey-Rosés, J, Persson, UM and Wunder, S (2017) The effectiveness of payments for environmental services. World Development 96, 359374.
44.DeFries, R and Rosenzweig, C (2010) Toward a whole-landscape approach for sustainable land use in the tropics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 1962719632.
45.Mekonnen, MM and Hoekstra, AY (2014) Water footprint benchmarks for crop production: a first global assessment. Ecological Indicators 46, 214223.
46.Hoekstra, AY and Wiedmann, TO (2014) Humanity's unsustainable environmental footprint. Science 344, 11141117.
47.Bullock, JM, Dhanjal-Adams, KL, Milne, A, Oliver, TH, Todman, LC, Whitmore, AP and Pywell, RF (2017) Resilience and food security: rethinking an ecological concept. Journal of Ecology 105, 880884.
48.Schipanski, ME, MacDonald, GK, Rosenzweig, S, Chappell, MJ, Bennett, EM, Kerr, RB, Blesh, J, Crews, T, Drinkwater, L, Lundgren, JG and Schnarr, C (2016) Realizing resilient food systems. Bioscience 66, 600610.
49.Suweis, S, Carr, JA, Maritan, A, Rinaldo, A, Suweis, S, Carr, JA, Maritan, A, Rinaldo, A and Odorico, PD (2015) Resilience and reactivity of global food security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112, 69026907.
50.Jarvie, HP, Sharpley, AN, Flaten, D, Kleinman, PJA, Jenkins, A and Simmons, T (2015) The pivotal role of phosphorus in a resilient water-energy-food security nexus. Journal of Environmental Quality 44, 10491062.
51.Muradian, R, Arsel, M, Pellegrini, L, Adaman, F, Aguilar, B, Agarwal, B, Corbera, E, Ezzine de Blas, D, Farley, J, Froger, G, Garcia-Frapolli, E, Gómez-Baggethun, E, Gowdy, J, Kosoy, N, Le Coq, JF, Leroy, P, May, P, Méral, P, Mibielli, P, Norgaard, R, Ozkaynak, B, Pascual, U, Pengue, W, Perez, M, Pesche, D, Pirard, R, Ramos-Martin, J, Rival, L, Saenz, F, Van Hecken, G, Vatn, A, Vira, B and Urama, K (2013) Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win–win solutions. Conservation Letters 6, 274279.
52.Wunder, S (2013) When payments for environmental services will work for conservation. Conservation Letters 6, 230237.
53.Benton, TG, Fairweather, D, Graves, A, Harris, J, Jones, A, Lenton, T, Norman, R, O'Riordan, T, Pope, E and Tiffin, R (2017) Environmental tipping points and food system dynamics: Main Report, p. 28. http://www.storre.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/24796/1/GFS_Tipping%20Points_Main%20Report.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2018.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Global Sustainability
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 2059-4798
  • URL: /core/journals/global-sustainability
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Bell et al. supplementary material
Bell et al. supplementary material 1

 Unknown (280 KB)
280 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 20
Total number of PDF views: 97 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 477 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 13th June 2018 - 23rd July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.