Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Party Mobilization and Electoral Systems

Abstract

How party strategies vary by electoral system remains largely unexplored in election studies. Using qualitative and quantitative data from Spanish national and European elections, we test how party strategies diverge between districted electoral systems and systems using a single national district. We use the number of visits to districts by the party leaders to determine if targeted party strategies are driven by district magnitude, the share of the population entitled to vote in every district, the number of districts or the strength of parties’ local organizations. Our results show that only the frequency of visits to districts by large parties are clearly affected by electoral systems and, more specifically, by the number of districts and district population.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Party Mobilization and Electoral Systems
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Party Mobilization and Electoral Systems
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Party Mobilization and Electoral Systems
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Ignacio Lago is Associate Professor of Political Science at Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona). Contact email: ignacio.lago@upf.edu.

Sandra Bermúdez is Adjunct Professor of Political Science at Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona). Contact email: sandra.bermudez@upf.edu.

Marc Guinjoan is a Postdoctoral Researcher in the Department of Political Science at the Autonomous University of Barcelona. Contact email: marc.guinjoanc@uab.cat.

Kelly Rowe works as a Policy Advisor for Infrastructure Canada. Contact email: kelly.rowe@canada.ca.

Pablo Simón is Visiting Professor of Political Science at the University Carlos III, Madrid. Contact email: pablo.simon@uc3m.es.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Blais A. (2010), ‘Making Electoral Democracy Work’, Electoral Studies, 29(1): 169170.
Blais A. and Lago I. (2009), ‘A General Measure of District Competitiveness’, Electoral Studies, 28(1): 94100.
Cox G.W. (1997), Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Cox G.W. (1999), ‘Electoral Rules and the Calculus of Mobilization’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 24(3): 387419.
Cox G.W. (2015), ‘Electoral Rules, Mobilization, and Turnout’, Annual Review of Political Science, 18: 4968.
Criado H. (2004), Competir para ganar: Las estrategias del PSOE y el PP en las campañas electorales de 1996 y 2000 (Madrid: Instituto Juan March).
Criado H. (2008), ‘The Effects of Party Mobilisation Strategies on the Vote: The PSOE and the PP in the 1996 Spanish Election’, European Journal of Political Research, 47(1): 80100.
Denemark D. (2003), ‘Electoral Change, Inertia And Campaigns in New Zealand: The First Modern FPP Campaign in 1987 and the First MMP Campaign in 1996’, Party Politics, 9(5): 601618.
Denver D., Hands G., Fisher J. and MacAllister I. (2003), ‘Constituency Campaigning in Britain 1992–2001: Centralization and Modernization’, Party Politics, 9(5): 541559.
Fernández-Albertos J. (2012), ‘Las Elecciones Europeas y la Economía: ¿Son Estas Elecciones Referendos Sobre Los Gobiernos Nacionales’, in M. Torcal and J. Jont (eds), Elecciones Europeas 2009 (Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas): 227252.
Fisher J., Cutts D. and Fieldhouse E. (2011), ‘The Electoral Effectiveness of Constituency Campaigning in the 2010 British General Election: The “Triumph” of Labour?’, Electoral Studies, 30(4): 816828.
Johnston R., Cutts D., Pattie C. and Fisher J. (2012), ‘We’ve Got Them on the List: Contacting, Canvassing and Voting in a British General Election Campaign’, Electoral Studies, 31(2): 317329.
Karp J.A., Banducci S.A. and Bowler S. (2007), ‘Getting Out the Vote: Party Mobilization in a Comparative Perspective’, British Journal of Political Science, 38(1): 91112.
Katz R.S. (1980), A Theory of Parties and Electoral Systems (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
King G. (1989), ‘Event Count Models for International Relations: Generalizations and Applications’, International Studies Quarterly, 33(2): 123147.
Méndez Lago M. (2000), La Estrategia Organizativa del Partido Socialista Obrero Español, 1975–1996 (Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas).
Pattie C. and Johnston R. (2009), ‘Still Talking, But Is Anyone Listening? The Changing Face of Constituency Campaigning in Britain, 1997–2005’, Party Politics, 15(4): 411434.
Reif K. and Schmitt H. (1980), ‘Nine Second-order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Elections Results’, European Journal of Political Research, 8(1): 344.
Rosenstone S.J. and Hansen J.M. (1993), Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America (New York: Macmillan).
Samuels D. and Snyder R. (2001), ‘The Value of a Vote: Malapportionment in Comparative Perspective’, British Journal of Political Science, 31(4): 651671.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 62 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 321 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 23rd January 2017 - 18th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.