Skip to main content

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Cancel
×
×
Home
  • Home
Article
  • Access

Going Negative, Worldwide: Towards a General Understanding of Determinants and Targets of Negative Campaigning

  • Alessandro Nai (a1)
Abstract

Little comparative evidence exists about what causes candidates to use negative campaigning in elections. We introduce an original comparative data set that contains experts’ information about campaigning strategies of 172 candidates competing in 35 national elections worldwide between June 2016 and May 2017. Analyses reveal several trends: incumbents run positive campaigns but are especially likely to attract attacks, candidates far from the ideological centre are more likely to ‘go negative’, candidates tend to attack frontrunners and rivals that are far from them ideologically, but they also engage in a logic of attack reciprocity with selected candidates. The comparative nature of the data also allows us to test whether variations in the context affect the use of campaign negativity; we find that the context matters mostly indirectly, by altering the effects of individual characteristics.

  • View HTML
      • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Going Negative, Worldwide: Towards a General Understanding of Determinants and Targets of Negative Campaigning
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Going Negative, Worldwide: Towards a General Understanding of Determinants and Targets of Negative Campaigning
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Going Negative, Worldwide: Towards a General Understanding of Determinants and Targets of Negative Campaigning
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
COPYRIGHT: © The Author. Published by Government and Opposition Limited and Cambridge University Press 2018 
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email: A.Nai@uva.nl
References
Hide All
Ansolabehere, S Iyengar, S (1995) Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.
Ansolabehere, S , Iyengar, S , Simon, A Valentino, N (1994) Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate? American Political Science Review 88(4), 829–838.
Benoit, K Laver, M (2007) Estimating Party Policy Positions: Comparing Expert Surveys and Hand-Coded Content Analysis. Electoral Studies 26(1), 90–107.
Benoit, WL (2007) Communication in Political Campaigns. New York: Peter Lang.
Blackwell, M (2013) A Framework for Dynamic Causal Inference in Political Science. American Journal of Political Science 57(2), 504–520.
Bol, D Bohl, M (2015) Negative Campaigning in Proportional Representation (Yet Non-coalition) Systems: Evidence from Switzerland. In Nai A and Walter AS (eds), New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 115–127.
Brader, T (2005) Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions. American Journal of Political Science 49(2), 388–405.
Brians, CL Wattenberg, MP (1996) Campaign Issue Knowledge and Salience: Comparing Reception from TV Commercials, TV News and Newspapers. American Journal of Political Science 40(1), 172–193.
Brookes, K , Le Gall, C Berton, RM (2014) The 2012 French Electoral Campaign: Tools to Understand Campaign Dynamics. French Politics 12(3), 255–264.
Brooks DJ and Murov M (2012) Assessing Accountability in a Post-Citizens United Era: The Effects of Attack Ad Sponsorship by Unknown Independent Groups. American Politics Research 40(3), 383–418.
Brown, AR (2011) Wikipedia as a Data Source for Political Scientists: Accuracy and Completeness of Coverage. PS: Political Science and Politics 44(2), 339–343.
Cappella, JN Jamieson, KH (1997) Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press.
Curini, L (2010) Experts’ Political Preferences and their Impact on Ideological Bias. Party Politics 16(3), 299–321.
Curini, L (2011) Negative Campaigning in No-Cabinet Alternation Systems: Ideological Closeness and Blames of Corruption in Italy and Japan Using Party Manifesto Data. Japanese Journal of Political Science 12(3), 399–420.
Curini, L Martelli, P (2010) Ideological Proximity and Valence Competition. Negative Campaigning Through Allegation of Corruption in the Italian Legislative Arena from 1946 to 1994. Electoral Studies 29(4), 636–647.
Damore, DF (2002) Candidate Strategy and the Decision to Go Negative. Political Research Quarterly 55(3), 669–685.
De Landsheer, C Kalkhoven, L (2014) The Imagery of Geert Wilders, Leader of the Dutch Freedom Party (PVV). Paper presented at the IPSA World Congress, Canada, July.
De Nooy, W Kleinnijenhuis, J (2015) Attack, Support, and Coalitions in a Multiparty System: Understanding Negative Campaigning in a Country with a Coalition Government. In Nai A and Walter AS (eds), New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 75–93.
Dietrich, BJ , Lasley, S , Mondak, JJ , Remmel, ML Turner, J (2012) Personality and Legislative Politics: The Big Five Trait Dimensions Among US State Legislators. Political Psychology 33(2), 195–210.
Dolezal, M , Ennser-Jedenastik, L Müller, WC (2015) When Do Parties Attack their Competitors? Negative Campaigning in Austria, 2002–08. In Nai A and Walter AS (eds), New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 165–182.
Dolezal, M , Ennser-Jedenastik, L Müller, WC (2016) Negative Campaigning and the Logic of Retaliation in Multiparty Competition. International Journal of Press/Politics 21(2), 253–272.
Druckman, JN , Kifer, MJ Parkin, M (2010) Timeless Strategy Meets New Medium: Going Negative on Congressional Campaign Web Sites, 2002–2006. Political Communication 27(1), 88–103.
Duckitt, J (2006) Differential Effects of Right Wing Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation on Outgroup Attitudes and their Mediation by Threat from and Competitiveness to Outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32(5), 684–696.
Elmelund-Præstekær, C (2008) Negative Campaigning in a Multiparty System. Representation 44(1), 27–39.
Elmelund-Præstekær, C (2010) Beyond American Negativity: Toward a General Understanding of the Determinants of Negative Campaigning. European Political Science Review 2(1), 137–156.
Elmelund-Praestekaer, C Svensson, HM (2014) Ebbs and Flows of Negative Campaigning: A Longitudinal Study of Contextual Factors’ Influence on Danish Campaign Rhetoric. European Journal of Communication 29(2), 230–239.
Finkel, SE Geer, JG (1998) A Spot Check: Casting Doubt on the Demobilizing Effect of Attack Advertising. American Journal of Political Science 42(2), 573–595.
Fowler, EF , Ridout, TN Franz, MM (2016a) Political Advertising in 2016: The Presidential Election as Outlier? The Forum 14(4), 445–469.
Fowler, EF , Franz, MM Ridout, TN (2016b) Political Advertising in the United States. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Francia, PL Herrnson, PS (2007) Keeping it Professional: The Influence of Political Consultants on Candidate Attitudes Toward Negative Campaigning. Politics and Policy 35(2), 246–272.
Franz, M , Freedman, P , Goldstein, K Ridout, T (2008) Campaign Advertising and American Democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Fridkin, KL Kenney, PJ (2012) The Impact of Negative Campaigning on Citizens’ Actions and Attitudes. In Semetko HA and Scammell M (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Political Communication. Los Angeles: Sage, pp. 173–185.
Fridkin, KL , Kenney, PJ Woodall, GS (2009) Bad for Men, Better for Women: The Impact of Stereotypes During Negative Campaigns. Political Behavior 31(1), 53–77.
Gallagher, M (2014) Electoral Institutions and Representation. In LeDuc L, Niemi R and Norris P (eds), Comparing Democracies 4. London: Sage, pp. 11–31.
Geer, JG (2006) In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Geer, JG (2012) The News Media and the Rise of Negativity in Presidential Campaigns. PS: Political Science and Politics 45(3), 422–427.
Gélineau, F Blais, A (2015) Comparing Measures of Campaign Negativity: Expert Judgments, Manifestos, Debates and Ads. In Nai A and Walter AS (eds), New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 63–74.
Hansen, KM Pedersen, RT (2008) Negative Campaigning in a Multiparty System. Scandinavian Political Studies 31(4), 408–427.
Harrington, J Hess, G (1996) A Spatial Theory of Positive and Negative Campaigning. Games and Economic Behavior 17, 209–229.
Haynes, AA Rhine, SL (1998) Attack Politics in Presidential Nomination Campaigns: An Examination of the Frequency and Determinants of Intermediated Negative Messages Against Opponents. Political Research Quarterly 51(3), 691–721.
Healy, A Malhotra, N (2013) Retrospective Voting Reconsidered. Annual Review of Political Science 16, 285–306.
Heaven, PC Bucci, S (2001) Right‐Wing Authoritarianism, Social Dominance Orientation and Personality: An Analysis Using the IPIP Measure. European Journal of Personality 15(1), 49–56.
Hopkins, DJ King, G (2010) Improving Anchoring Vignettes: Designing Surveys to Correct Interpersonal Incomparability. Public Opinion Quarterly 74(2), 201–222.
Hopmann, DN , de Vreese, CH Albæk, E (2011) Incumbency Bonus in Election News Coverage Explained: The Logics of Political Power and the Media Market. Journal of Communication 61(2), 264–282.
Huddy, L Terkildsen, N (1993) Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates. American Journal of Political Science 37, 119–147.
Jackson, RA , Mondak, JJ Huckfeldt, R (2009) Examining the Possible Corrosive Impact of Negative Advertising on Citizens’ Attitudes Toward Politics. Political Research Quarterly 62(1), 55–69.
Kahn, KF (1996) The Political Consequences of Being a Woman. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kahn, KF Kenney, PJ (1999) Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship Between Negativity and Participation. American Political Science Review 93(4), 877–889.
King, G , Murray, CJ , Salomon, JA Tandon, A (2004) Enhancing the Validity and Cross-cultural Comparability of Measurement in Survey Research. American Political Science Review 98(1), 567–583.
Krupnikov, Y Bauer, NM (2014) The Relationship Between Campaign Negativity, Gender and Campaign Context. Political Behavior 36(1), 167–188.
Laakso, M Taagepera, R (1979) ‘Effective’ Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12, 3–27.
Lau, RR Pomper, GM (2001) Negative Campaigning by US Senate Candidates. Party Politics 7(1), 69–87.
Lau, RR Pomper, GM (2004) Negative Campaigning: An Analysis of U.S. Senate Elections. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
Lau, RR Rovner, IB (2009) Negative Campaigning. Annual Review of Political Science 12, 285–306.
Lau, RR , Sigelman, L Rovner, IB (2007) The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment. Journal of Politics 69(4), 1176–1209.
Lijphart, A (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Maier, J (2015) Do Female Candidates Feel Compelled to Meet Sex-Role Expectations or Are they as Tough as Men? A Content Analysis on the Gender-Specific Use of Attacks in German Televised Debates. In Nai A and Walter AS (eds), New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 129–146.
Maier, J Jansen, C (2015) When Do Candidates Attack in Election Campaigns? Exploring the Determinants of Negative Candidate Messages in German Televised Debates. Party Politics 23(5), 549–559.
Martin, PS (2004) Inside the Black Box of Negative Campaign Effects: Three Reasons Why Negative Campaigns Mobilize. Political Psychology 25(4), 545–562.
Mattes, K Redlawsk, DP (2015) The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McBride, J (2017) Dutch Elections and the Future of the EU. Interview with Pieter Cleppe, Council on Foreign Relations, 10 March, www.cfr.org/interview/dutch-elections-and-future-eu.
Nai, A (2013) What Really Matters is Which Camp Goes Dirty: Differential Effects of Negative Campaigning on Turnout During Swiss Federal Ballots. European Journal of Political Research 52(1), 44–70.
Nai, A (2014) The Cadillac, the Mother-in-law, and the Ballot: Individual and Contextual Roots of Ambivalence in Swiss Direct Democracy. Electoral Studies 33, 292–306.
Nai, A (2018) Disagreeable Narcissists, Extroverted Psychopaths, and Elections: A New Dataset to Measure the Personality of Candidates Worldwide. European Political Science, published early online, September, https://doi.org.10.1057/s41304-018-0187-2.
Nai, A Sciarini, P (2015) Why ‘Going Negative’? Strategic and Situational Determinants of Personal Attacks in Swiss Direct Democratic Votes. Journal of Political Marketing, published online, July, https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2015.1058310.
Nai, A Walter, A (eds) (2015) New Perspective on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press.
Nai, A Maier, J (2018) Perceived Personality and Campaign Style of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Personality and Individual Differences 121, 80–83.
Oliver, JE Rahn, WM (2016) Rise of the Trumpenvolk: Populism in the 2016 Election. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 667(1), 189–206.
Ott, BL (2017) The Age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the Politics of Debasement. Critical Studies in Media Communication 34(1), 59–68.
Pinkleton, B (1997) The Effects of Negative Comparative Political Advertising on Candidate Evaluations and Advertising Evaluations: An Exploration. Journal of Advertising 26(1), 19–29.
Plasser, F (2000) American Campaign Techniques Worldwide. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 5(4), 33–54.
Polk, J , Rovny, J , Bakker, R , Edwards, E , Hooghe, L , Jolly, S. , Koedam, J , Kostelka, F , Marks, G , Schumacher, G , Steenbergen, M , Vachudova, M Zilovic, M (2017) Explaining the Salience of Anti-elitism and Reducing Political Corruption for Political Parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey Data. Research and Politics 4(1), 1–9.
Redlawsk, DP , Roseman, IJ , Mattes, K Katz, S (2018) Donald Trump, Contempt, and the 2016 GOP Iowa Caucuses. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 28(2), 173–189.
Roese, NJ Sande, GN (1993) Backlash Effects in Attack Politics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 23(8), 632–653.
Shapiro, MA Rieger, RH (1992) Comparing Positive and Negative Political Advertising on Radio. Journalism Quarterly 69(1), 135–145.
Song, H , Nyhuis, D Boomgaarden, H (2017) A Network Model of Negative Campaigning: The Structure and Determinants of Negative Campaigning in Multiparty Systems. Communication Research, published early online, June, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0093650217712596.
Theilmann, J Wilhite, A (1998) Campaign Tactics and the Decision to Attack. Journal of Politics 60(4), 1050–1062.
Thorson, E , Ognianova, E , Coyle, J Denton, F (2000) Negative Political Ads and Negative Citizen Orientations Toward Politics. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 22(1), 13–40.
Trent, JS Friedenberg, RV (2008) Political Campaign Communication: Principles and Practices. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Van Hiel, A , Mervielde, I De Fruyt, F (2004) The Relationship between Maladaptive Personality and Right Wing Ideology. Personality and Individual Differences 36(2), 405–417.
Volkens, A , Lehmann, P , Matthiess, T , Merz, N Regel, S (2016) The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2016b. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
Walter, AS (2014) Choosing the Enemy: Attack Behaviour in a Multiparty System. Party Politics 20(3), 311–323.
Walter, AS Nai, A (2015) Explaining the Use of Attack Behaviour in the Electoral Battlefield: A Literature Overview. In Nai A and Walter AS (eds), New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 97–114.
Walter, AS van der Brug, W (2013) When the Gloves Come Off: Inter-party Variation in Negative Campaigning in Dutch Elections, 1981–2010. Acta Politica 48(4), 367–388.
Walter, AS Vliegenthart, R (2010) Negative Campaigning Across Different Communication Channels: Different Ballgames? Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 15(4), 441–461.
Walter, AS , van der Brug, W van Praag, P (2014) When the Stakes are High: Party Competition and Negative Campaigning. Comparative Political Studies 47(4), 550–573.
Wattenberg, MP Brians, CL (1999) Negative Campaign Advertising: Demobilizer or Mobilizer? American Political Science Review 93(4), 891–899.
Yoon, K , Pinkleton, BE Ko, W (2005) Effects of Negative Political Advertising on Voting Intention: An Exploration of the Roles of Involvement and Source Credibility in the Development of Voter Cynicism. Journal of Marketing Communications 11(2), 95–112.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Government and Opposition
  • ISSN: 0017-257X
  • EISSN: 1477-7053
  • URL: /core/journals/government-and-opposition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *

CAPTCHA *

Skip to the audio challenge
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Nai supplementary material
Online Appendix

 Word (832 KB)
832 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed

Cancel
Confirm
×