Skip to main content
×
Home

BRITAIN, THE TWO WORLD WARS, AND THE PROBLEM OF NARRATIVE*

  • DAVID REYNOLDS (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

The concept of coming to terms with the past originated in post-1945 West Germany but such historical therapy is evident in all the belligerent countries. In that process, the two world wars are intricately connected, each seen refractively through the prism of the other. This article focuses on Britain whose national obsession with the two world wars is particularly acute. The first and second sections suggest that British public discourse has been able to construct a satisfying narrative of 1939–45 but not of 1914–18, meaning a narrative that has both a clear beginning, middle, and end and also a stark moral meaning. Viable narratives draw on the events themselves, the words used to conceptualize them, and the interpretations of 'instant' histories and memoirs. The third section argues that the elevation of 1939–45 in national discourse as our ‘finest hour’ (Churchill) has aggravated the problematic nature of 1914–18 for the British. In the wake of Brexit, the last section argues that Britain – unlike France and Germany – has found it difficult to move on from the era of the two world wars by locating these conflicts in a more positive narrative of the twentieth century as the eventual triumph of European integration.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      BRITAIN, THE TWO WORLD WARS, AND THE PROBLEM OF NARRATIVE*
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      BRITAIN, THE TWO WORLD WARS, AND THE PROBLEM OF NARRATIVE*
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      BRITAIN, THE TWO WORLD WARS, AND THE PROBLEM OF NARRATIVE*
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Christ's College, Cambridge, cb2 3bu djr17@cam.ac.uk
Footnotes
Hide All
*

For helpful comments on earlier versions of these arguments, the author is grateful to Kristina Spohr, Zara Steiner, and John A. Thompson and also to the anonymous referees of the Historical Journal.

Footnotes
References
Hide All

1 Winter Jay, Remembering war: the Great War between memory and history in the twentieth century (New Haven, CT, 2006), esp. pp. 113, 275–89.

2 Gregory Adrian, The last Great War: British society and the First World War (Cambridge, 2008), pp. 30–3.

3 The despatches are available online at www.1914–1918.net/despatches.htm. Quotation is from French's tenth and last despatch, published belatedly on 21 Aug. 1916. See also Farrar Martin J., News from the Front: war correspondents on the Western Front, 1914–1918 (Stroud, 1998), esp. pp. 13, 221–2.

4 Kramer Alan, Dynamic of destruction: culture and mass killing in the First World War (Oxford, 2007), p. 13 ; Gregory, Last Great War, p. 57.

5 For a judicious re-examination, see Horne John and Kramer Alan, German atrocities, 1914: a history of denial (New Haven, CT, 2001), p. 419 .

6 ‘Changing warfare’, Times, 24 Nov. 1914, p. 5; cf. Stevenson David, 1914–1918: the story of the First World War (London, 2004), p. 184 .

7 Johnson Matthew, ‘The Liberal war committee and liberal advocacy of conscription in Britain, 1914–1916’, Historical Journal, 51 (2008), pp. 399420 .

8 Hibberd Dominic and Onions John, eds., The winter of the world: poems of the First World War (London, 2007), pp. xixxx .

9 Stevenson, 1914–1918, p. 170.

10 Reeves Nicholas, ‘Through the eye of the camera: contemporary audiences and their “experience” of war in the film Battle of the Somme ’, in Cecil Hugh and Liddle Peter H., eds., Facing Armageddon: the First World War experience (London, 1996), ch. 55, quoting pp. 782, 786–90; cf. ‘War's realities on the cinema’, Times, 22 Aug. 1916, p. 3.

11 Reeves, ‘Through the eye of the camera’, pp. 785, 791–2; Wells H. G., The war that will end war (London, 1914), pp. 9, 11.

12 Grigg John, Lloyd George: from peace to war, 1912–1916 (London, 1997), pp. 423–8, interview of 28 Sept. 1916.

13 Stevenson David, With our backs to the wall: victory and defeat in 1918 (London, 2011), pp. 526–7, 541–3.

14 Keynes John Maynard, The economic consequences of the peace (London, 1920), pp. 32, 209; Skidelsky Robert, John Maynard Keynes (3 vols., London, 1983–2000), i, pp. 393–4.

15 Ferguson Niall, The pity of war (London, 1998), pp. 412–19.

16 Marks Sally, ‘Smoke and mirrors: in smoke-filled rooms and the Galérie des Glaces’, in Boemeke Manfred F., Feldman Gerald D., and Glaser Elisabeth, eds., The Treaty of Versailles: a reassessment after 75 years (Cambridge, 1998), p. 338 ; see also Ritschl Albrecht, ‘The pity of peace: Germany's economy at war, 1914–1918 and beyond’, in Broadberry Stephen and Harrison Mark, eds., The economics of World War I (Cambridge, 2005), esp. pp. 66–8.

17 Liddell Hart B. H., The real war, 1914–1918 (London, 1930), p. 503 . See also Strachan Hew, ‘“The real war”: Liddell Hart, Cruttwell, and Falls’, in Bond Brian, ed., The First World War and British military history (Oxford, 1991), pp. 4167 .

18 Haig, ‘Final despatch, part II (features of the war)’, 8 Apr. 1919 – available at www.1914–1918.net/haigs_final_despatch.html. See also Dewar G. A. B. and Boraston J. H., Sir Douglas Haig's command, December 19, 1915 – November 11, 1918 (2 vols., London, 1922).

19 Churchill to Edmonds, 29 Aug. 1926 and 18 Sept. 1926 (quotation), Churchill papers, CHAR 8/203, fos. 67 and 81 (Churchill Archives Centre, Cambridge); Churchill Winston S., The world crisis, 1916–1918, part I (London, 1927), ch. 2, quoting pp. 45, 54–5, 57.

20 Prior Robin, Churchill's ‘world crisis’ as history (London, 1983), pp. 221–30; Philpott William, Bloody victory: the sacrifice on the Somme (London, 2009), pp. 596603 ; cf. Ferguson, Pity of war, pp. 292–303; Watson Alexander, Ring of steel: Germany and Austria-Hungary at war, 1914–1918 (London, 2015), pp. 514–23.

21 Hankey to Lloyd George, 16 Apr. 1934, with comments on Passchendaele chapter, and Lloyd George to Hankey, 18 Apr. 1934, Lloyd George papers, G/212 (House of Lords Record Office). See generally Egerton George W., ‘The Lloyd George War memoirs: a study in the politics of memory’, Journal of Modern History, 60 (1988), pp. 5594 .

22 George David Lloyd, War memoirs (6 vols., London, 1933–6), iv, pp. 2110, 2251; Bond Brian, The unquiet Western Front: Britain's role in literature and history (Cambridge, 2002), pp. 46–8.

23 Lloyd George, Memoirs, vi, p. xiii, iii p. xi.

24 Egerton, ‘Lloyd George War memoirs’, p. 79; the king's speech of 9 June 1920, quoted in 3rd Annual Report of the Imperial War Museum, 1919–20, p. 4 (IWM Archives, London).

25 Gregory Adrian, The silence of memory: Armistice Day, 1919–1946 (London, 1994), pp. 123, 126.

26 Reynolds David, The long shadow: the Great War and the twentieth century (London, 2013), pp. 217–23, 228–9; see also McCarthy Helen, The British people and the League of Nations: democracy, citizenship and internationalism (Manchester, 2011).

27 Gregory, Last Great War, p. 275.

28 For a pioneering exploration of this theme, see Harris Jose, ‘War and social history: Britain and the Home Front during the Second World War’, Contemporary European History, 1 (1992), pp. 1735 .

29 For studies of these themes, see Calder Angus, The myth of the Blitz (London, 1991); Smith Malcolm, Britain and 1940: history, myth and popular memory (London, 2000); Connelly Mark, We can take it! Britain and the memory of the Second World War (London, 2004); and Rose Sonya, Which people's war? National identity and citizenship in Britain, 1939–1945 (Oxford, 2003).

30 House of Commons, Debates, 5th ser., 362, cols. 60–1, and 364, cols. 1159–60 and 1167, 18 June and 20 Aug. 1940.

31 Toye Richard, The roar of the lion: the untold story of Churchill's World War II speeches (Oxford, 2013), pp. 62–3.

32 ‘The Battle of Britain: an Air Ministry account of the great days from 8th August – 31st October 1940’ (London, 1941), pp. 4–5, 35; Peck to Peirse, 6 Apr. 1941, London, The National Archives (TNA), Air Ministry papers, AIR 19/258; Overy Richard, The battle (London, 2000), pp. 130–1.

33 Times, 25 May 1940, p. 7; Commons, Debates, 361, cols. 792, 795, 4 June 1940; Connelly, We can take it!, p. 66; Calder Angus, The people's war: Britain, 1939–1945 (2nd edn, London, 1971), p. 130 .

34 ‘Little Gidding’, in The collected poems and plays of T. S. Eliot (London, 1969), p. 197; Ackroyd Peter, T. S. Eliot (London, 1985), pp. 263–4.

35 Priestley J. B., Postscripts (London, 1940), p. 4 ; Times, 6 June 1940, p. 7. See also Nicholas Siân, ‘“Sly demagogues” and wartime radio: J. B. Priestley and the BBC’, Twentieth Century British History, 6 (1995), pp. 247–66.

36 Titmuss Richard M., Problems of social policy (London, 1950), pp. 335–6; Connelly, We can take it!, p. 142; Noakes Lucy, War and the British: gender, memory and national identity (London, 1998), pp. 26, 29.

37 Churchill Winston S., The Second World War (6 vols., London, 1948–54), iv, pp. 343–4, 352, 378; Alanbrooke Lord, War diaries, 1939–1945, ed. Danchev Alex and Todman Daniel (London, 2001), p. 244 .

38 French David, Raising Churchill's army: the British Army and the war against Germany, 1919–1945 (London, 2000), pp. 242–6, 274–85, quoting Monty on p. 245.

39 Hastings Max, Finest years: Churchill as warlord, 1940–1945 (London, 2009), p. 302 ; Barr Niall, Pendulum of war: the three battles of Alamein (London, 2004), pp. xxxvii, 404–7; Philpott, Bloody victory, pp. 600–3.

40 Charles de Gaulle, Mémoires de guerre: l'unité (1942–1944), in de Gaulle, Mémoires (complete edn, Paris, 2000), pp. 487–8.

41 Reynolds, Long shadow, pp. 272–3; Sadkovich James K., ‘Understanding defeat: reappraising Italy's role in the Second World War’, Journal of Contemporary History, 24 (1989), p. 46 .

42 Ellis John, Cassino: the hollow victory (London, pbk edn, 2003), p. 222 ; Ellis John, World War II: the sharp end (London, 1980), p. 156 .

43 A point made clear in the cabinet secretary's notes of the meeting on 9 Apr. 1945, TNA, WM 41 (45) 6, CAB 195/3, pp. 85–6.

44 Haggith Toby, ‘The filming of the liberation of Bergen-Belsen and its impact on the understanding of the Holocaust’, in Bardgett Suzanne and Caesarani David, eds., Belsen 1945: new historical perspectives (London, 2006), p. 89 .

45 Kushner Tony, The Holocaust and the liberal imagination (Oxford, 1994), p. 210 ; Haggith, ‘Filming’, p. 110.

46 ‘Cato’, Guilty men, ed. John Stevenson (London, 1998), pp. xv, 14, 17, 45; cf. Julie V. Gottlieb, ‘Guilty women’, foreign policy, and appeasement in inter-war Britain (Houndsmill, 2015).

47 Labour party, Let us face the future (1945) – www.labour-party.org.uk/manifestos; Daily Mirror, 5 July 1945, p. 1.

48 Calder, Myth of the Blitz, p. 7; Mowat Charles Loch, Britain between the wars, 1918–1940 (London, 1955), pp. 656–7; see also Baxendale John and Pawling Christopher, Narrating the thirties: a decade in the making, 1930 to the present (London, 1996).

49 TNA, CAB 103/286, quoting Bridges to Martin, 24 June 1944, and TNA, CAB 134/105, meeting of 21 Jan. 1948, minute 7, and Attlee's endorsement, 27 Jan. 1948; see also Reynolds David, ‘The origins of “the Second World War”: historical discourse and international politics’, Journal of Contemporary History, 38 (2003), pp. 2944 .

50 See Carr Edward Hallett, The twenty years’ crisis, 1919–1939: an introduction to the study of international relations (2nd edn, London, 1946), p. 224 ; Haslam Jonathan, The vices of integrity: E. H. Carr, 1892–1982 (London, 1999), pp. 68–9.

51 Churchill, Second World War, i, p. vii. See also Bell P. M. H., The origins of the Second World War in Europe (London, 1986), chs. 2–4; and Howard Michael, ‘A Thirty Years War? The two world wars in historical perspective’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 6th ser., 3 (1993), pp. 171–84.

52 Churchill, Second World War, i, p. ix; Plumb J. H., ‘The historian’, in Taylor A. J. P. et al. , Churchill: four faces and the man (London, 1969), p. 149 . See also Reynolds David, In command of history: Churchill fighting and writing the Second World War (London, 2004).

53 Pronay Nicholas, ‘The British post-bellum cinema: a survey of the films relating to World War II made in Britain between 1945 and 1960’, Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 8 (1988), esp. pp. 3941 ; Ramsden John, ‘Refocusing “the people's war’: British war films of the 1950s’, Journal of Contemporary History, 33 (1998), esp. pp. 36–8, 45.

54 Clark Alan, The donkeys (London, 1961), pp. 6, 186; Trewin Ion, Alan Clark: the biography (London, 2009), pp. 181–2, 188–9.

55 Theatre Workshop, Oh what a lovely war, rev. edn by Joan Littlewood (London, 2000), p. 87; Bond, Unquiet Western Front, pp. 63–8, quoting review on p. 67.

56 Alex Danchev, ‘“Bunking” and “debunking”: the controversies of the 1960s’, in Bond, ed., The First World War and British military history, p. 263.

57 Taylor A. J. P., The First World War: an illustrated history (London, 1966 edn), pp. 28, 85; Todman Dan, The Great War: myth and memory (London, 2005), p. 138 .

58 Taylor, First World War, pp. 16, 20, 255, 287.

59 Ibid., p. 140. Bond, Unquiet Western Front, p. 63, underplays the importance of Taylor in this shift of attention from Passchendaele to the Somme.

60 Hibberd Dominic, ‘Anthologies of Great War verse: mirrors of change’, in Howard Michael, ed., A part of history: aspects of the British experience of the First World War (London, 2009), p. 112 .

61 Blunden Edmund, ‘The soldier poets of 1914–1918’, in Brereton Frederick, ed., An anthology of war poems (London, 1930), pp. 1324 ; cf. Reilly Catherine, English poetry of the First World War: a bibliography (London, 1978), p. xix .

62 Gardner Brian, ed., Up the line to death: the war poets, 1914–1918 (London, 1964), pp. viiviii, xix.

63 Hussey Maurice, ed., Poetry of the First World War (London, 1967), esp. p. xv; see also http://greatwarfiction.wordpress.com/2010/10/10/up-the-line-to-death/.

64 Bond, Unquiet Western Front, ch. 4.

65 Sheffield Gary, Forgotten victory: the First World War: myths and realities (London, 2001), pp. xvii, 48, 169, 253–4, 263.

66 Philpott, Bloody victory, pp. 626–9; Sheffield, Forgotten victory, pp. 92–3, 280.

67 Merridale Catherine, Night of stone: death and memory in Russia (London, 2000), pp. 122–9, 452; Stockdale Melissa, ‘United in gratitude: honoring soldiers and defining the nation in Russia's Great War’, Kritika, 7 (2006), pp. 465–8, 482. See more generally Petrone Karen, The Great War in Russian history (Bloomington, IN, 2011).

68 See Tumarkin Nina, The living and the dead: the rise and fall of the cult of World War II in Russia (New York, NY, 1994); Lovell Stephen, The shadow of war: Russia and the USSR, 1941 to the present (Oxford, 2010).

69 See Congressional Research Service, report RL32492, ‘American war and military operations casualties: lists and statistics’, 26 Feb. 2010, p. 2; and Byerly Carol, ‘The US military and the influenza pandemic of 1918–1919’, Public Health Reports, 125, no. 3 (2010), pp. 8291, esp. figure 3.

70 Strout Cushing, The American image of the old world (New York, NY, 1963), p. 205 .

71 See generally Bodnar John, The ‘good war’ in American memory (Baltimore, MD, 2010).

72 Fulbrook Mary, German national identity after the Holocaust (Cambridge, 1999), pp. 5960, 66; cf. Meinecke Friedrich, A German catastrophe, trans. Fay Sidney B. (Boston, MA, 1950), p. 96 .

73 In origin, a mocking caricature by Munich historian Helmut Krausnick – see Eckert Astrid, ‘The transnational beginnings of West German Zeitgeschichte in the 1950s’, Central European History, 40 (2007), p. 86 .

74 ‘The Fischer controversy 50 years on’ – special issue of the Journal of Contemporary History, 48 (2013), pp. 231–417; cf. Clark Christopher, The sleepwalkers: how Europe went to war in 1914 (London, 2012); McMeekin Sean, July 1914: countdown to war (London, 2013).

75 Quoted in Rousso Henry, The Vichy syndrome: history and memory in France since 1944, trans. Goldhammer Arthur (Cambridge, MA, 1991), p. 90 .

76 Jackson Julian, France: the dark years, 1940–1944 (Oxford, 2001), p. 613 .

77 Rousso, Vichy syndrome, pp. 110–11.

78 Wieviorka Olivier, La mémoire désunie: le souvenir politique des années sombres de la libération à nos jours (Paris, 2010), pp. 134–5.

79 Schwarz Hans-Peter, Adenauer: Der Staatsmann, 1952–1967 (Munich, 1994), p. 297 .

80 Prime minister to foreign secretary, 25 Nov. 1944, TNA, prime minister's files, PREM 4/30/8, fo. 488. Churchill's comment on Belgium is presumably a reference to the country's decision to abrogate its French alliance and opt for neutrality in 1936.

81 Quotations from his speeches at Zurich, 19 Sept. 1946, and Llandudno, 9 Oct. 1948, in James Robert Rhodes, ed., Winston S. Churchill: his complete speeches, 1874–1963 (8 vols., New York, NY, 1974), vii, pp. 7381 and 7712.

82 ‘Policy towards Europe’, agreed minute of meeting on 5 Jan. 1949, printed in Clarke Richard, Anglo-American economic collaboration in war and peace, 1942–1949 (Oxford, 1982), pp. 208–9.

83 Memo by Pierson Dixon, 23 Aug. 1950, TNA, Foreign Office papers, FO 800/517, US/50/35.

84 Quoted in Ludlow N. Piers, Dealing with Britain: the six and the first UK application to the EEC (Cambridge, 1997), p. 32 .

85 Reynolds David, Britannia overruled: British policy and world power in the twentieth century (2nd edn, London, 2000), pp. 208, 212; Macmillan Harold, At the end of the day, 1961–1963 (London, 1973), p. 339 .

86 George Stephen, An awkward partner: Britain in the European community (Oxford 1990); cf. Buller Jim, ‘Britain as an awkward partner: reassessing Britain's relations with the EU’, Politics, 15 (1995), pp. 3342 ; Gilbert Mark, ‘Narrating the process: questioning the progressive story of European integration’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 46 (2008), pp. 641–62.

87 Smith, Britain and 1940, p. 148.

* For helpful comments on earlier versions of these arguments, the author is grateful to Kristina Spohr, Zara Steiner, and John A. Thompson and also to the anonymous referees of the Historical Journal.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Historical Journal
  • ISSN: 0018-246X
  • EISSN: 1469-5103
  • URL: /core/journals/historical-journal
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 85
Total number of PDF views: 589 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1374 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 25th October 2016 - 25th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.