Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T02:27:34.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Quest for a Science of Education in the Nineteenth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2017

James R. Robarts
James R. Robarts*
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When one reads the records of nineteenth-century educators as they wrestled with the question, “Is there a discipline of education?” one finds them very often assuming or flatly asserting that there is or can be such a science and then devoting a major part of their attention to the need for the development of it. Throughout the period this need reflected two concerns: the quality of education and professional status.

Type
The Century of Hope I
Information
History of Education Quarterly , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , Winter 1968 , pp. 431 - 446
Copyright
Copyright © 1968 by New York University 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. (Carter, James G.), “Reviews,” U.S. Literary Gazette, III (December 1825), 177–78.Google Scholar

2. Carter, James G., “On the Development of the Intellectual Faculties and on the Teaching of Geography,“ The American Institute of Instruction (Boston, 1830), pp. 67–71.Google Scholar

3. Wayland, Francis, “Introductory Discourse,” The American Institute of Instruction (Boston 1830), pp. 6–13.Google Scholar

4. Phelps, William F., “Normal Schools—Their Organization and Course of Study,” The American Normal School Association (1866), p. 136.Google Scholar

5. Chrisman, Oscar, “Child-Study, A New Development of Education,” The Forum, XVI (February 1894), 731–32.Google Scholar

6. Ibid. Google Scholar

7. Thompson, C. O., “Hints Toward a Profession of Teaching,” “The American Institute of Instruction (Boston, 1867), p. 152.Google Scholar

8. Scriptures, Edward W., “Methods of Laboratory Mind Study,” The Forum, XVII (August 1894), 727.Google Scholar

9. McLouth, Lewis claimed in 1879 that 9/10ths of the normal school work was purely academic. “A Contribution to the Question of Professional Instruction in the Normal Schools,” N.E.A. Proceedings (1879), p. 123.Google Scholar

10. Allen's statement is revealing in that he sees the major problem not one of discovering such laws but convincing the public that they exist and that teachers should know them. Allen, Jerome, “Presidential Address,” N.E.A. Proceeding (1881), p. 199.Google Scholar

11. Donaldson, James, “The Science of Education,” The American Journal of Education, XXVI (1876), 485–87.Google Scholar

12. Brooks, Edward, “Centennial Thoughts on Normal Schools,” N.E.A. Proceedings (1876), p. 164.Google Scholar

13. Edwards, Richard, “Normal Schools in the United States,” National Teachers Association (1865), pp. 531–32.Google Scholar

14. Rounds, C. C., “Lines of Advance,” N.E.A. Proceedings (1881), p. 15.Google Scholar

15. Hall, G. S., “Chairs of Pedagogy in our Higher Institutions of Learning,” N.E.A. Proceedings (1882), p. 38.Google Scholar

16. Balliet, Thomas M., “The Study of Pedagogics,” Education, XIV (October 1893), 65.Google Scholar

17. Lathrop, Delia A., “The Professional Training of Teachers,” N.E.A. Proceedings (1875), p. 142.Google Scholar

18. Rounds, C. C., “Attacks on Normal Schools,” N.E.A. Proceedings (1884), pp. 159–60.Google Scholar

19. Buckham, H. B., “Relative Contributions of Scholarship and Methods to the Power of the Teacher,” N.E.A. Proceedings (1873), p. 190.Google Scholar

20. John Ogden who had declared emphatically in 1859 that education was a science had become dissolutioned by 1870 for he declared: “We claim that education is a science but where shall we go for the proof? Who had undertaken to set in order the facts and principles of this science so that they shall be accepted as the guide to the student of didactics?” Ogden, John, “Presidential Address,” The American Normal School Association (1870), p. 10.Google Scholar

21. Ogden, John, “To What Extent can the Art of Teaching be Taught in Our Normal Schools,” The American Normal School Association (1859), pp. 60–64.Google Scholar

22. Ogden, John, “Resolution,” The American Normal School Association (1869), pp. 34–35.Google Scholar

23. “Committee on Resolutions,” The American Normal School Association (1869), pp. 106–7.Google Scholar

24. Edwards, , op. cit. Google Scholar

25. “Report of the Committee of Pedagogics to the National Council of Education,” N.E.A. Proceedings (1884), pp. 42–43.Google Scholar

26. Ogden, John, “What Constitutes a Consistent Course of Study for the Normal Schools?” N.E.A. Proceedings (1874), p. 221.Google Scholar

27. Scriptures, Edward W., “Education as a Science,” The Pedagogical Seminary, II (1892), 112.Google Scholar

28. James, William, Talks to Teachers on Psychology (New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1899), p. 7.Google Scholar

29. Dewey, John, “Criticisms Wise and Otherwise on Modern Child Study,” N.E.A. Proceedings (1897), pp. 86–87.Google Scholar

30. Winship, A. E., “Editorial: The Science of Education,” Journal of Education, XXIV (October 14, 1886), 244–45.Google Scholar

31. Royce, Josiah, “Is There a Science of Education?” Educational Review, I (January-February 1891), 1–25, 121–32.Google Scholar

32. Gordy, James P., “What Can Child-Study Contribute to the Science of Education?” N.E.A. Proceedings (1898), p. 348.Google Scholar

33. Ibid., pp. 350–52.Google Scholar

34. Reinhart, J. A., “The Inductive Element in the Science of Education,” Education, II (November 1881), 173.Google Scholar

35. Dunton, Larkin, “What Must be the Special Work of the Normal Schools to Entitle them to be Called Professional?” N.E.A. Proceedings , (1874), pp. 240–41.Google Scholar

36. Payne, William H., Contributions to the Science of Education (New York: The American Book Co., 1886), pp. vi–vii.Google Scholar

37. Ibid., p. 20.Google Scholar

38. For an exposition of Herbartianism as a rational science of education, see Brauner, Charles J., American Educational Theory (Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1964), pp. 49–65.Google Scholar

39. (Carter, ), op. cit. Google Scholar

40. Soldan, Louis, “Opening Address,” N.E.A. Proceedings (1884), p. 204.Google Scholar

41. Quoted in: Luckey, George W., Essentials of Child-Study (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1917), p. 16.Google Scholar

42. Russell, E. H., “The Study of Children at the State Normal School, Worcester, Massachusetts,” The Pedagogical Seminary, II (1892), 352.Google Scholar

43. Munsterberg, Hugo, “Psychology and Education,” Educational Review, XVI (September 1898), 115–16.Google Scholar

44. Dewey, , pp. 86–87.Google Scholar

45. Scriptures, , op. cit. pp. 111–13.Google Scholar

46. Ibid., p. 114.Google Scholar

47. Scriptures, E. W., “Child-Study: Its Methods and Results,” The American Institute of Instruction (1895), pp. 185–88.Google Scholar

48. “Can you use ‘Educational Technology,”’ Educational News Service (Saddle Brook, N. J.: n.d.), n.p. Google Scholar