Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T21:14:25.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Face Before the Mirror-Stage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Abstract

Drawing on the work of Irigaray and Levinas, this paper discusses the ethical limitations of Lacan's “mirror-stage” dynamic and interpolates a different interpretation of the material he uses to elaborate his theory. Close attention is paid to the significance of metaphors of vision and touch in the work of the three philosophers. The paper develops into an analysis of bigamy's and Levinas's interpretations of touch as the differential site of ethics.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernasconi, Robert, and Wood, David, eds. 1988. The provocation of Levinas. London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Cixous, Hélène. 1981. Sorties. In New French feminisms. Marks, Elaine and de Courtivron, Isabelle, eds. Sussex: Harvester Press; New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Cohen, Richard A., ed. 1986. Face to face with Levinas. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1978. Violence and metaphysics: An essay on the thought of Emmanual Levinas. In Writing and difference. Bass, Alan, trans. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1980. Textes pour Emmanuel Levinas. Paris: J. M. Place.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1982. Margins of philosophy. Sussex: Harvester Press; Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, and McDonald, Christie V. 1982. Choreographies. (Interview.) Diacritics 12(Summer): 6676.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1925. Some psychological consequences of the anatomical distinction between the sexes. Standard Edition 19: 241–58.Google Scholar
Gallop, Jane. 1985. Reading Lacan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gallop, Jane. 1989. Moving backwards or forwards. In Beyond feminism and psychoanalysis. Brennan, Teresa, ed. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1987. The “People of the Book”: Representation and alterity in Emmanuel Levinas. Art & Text 26(Sept.‐Nov.): 3240.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1989. Sexual subversions. Sydney and Boston: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Irigaray, Luce. 1981. Le corps‐à‐corps avec la mère. Montreal: Editions de la Pleine Lune.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1984. L'Éihique de la différence sexuelle. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1985. This sex which is not one. Porter, Catherine with Burke, Carolyn, trans. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1986a. Divine women. Muecke, Stephen trans. Occasional Paper 8. Sydney: Local Consumption Publications.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1986b. The fecundity of the caress. In Face to face with Levinas. Cohen, Richard A., ed. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1991. Questions to Emmanuel Levinas: On the divinity of love. Margaret Whitford, trans. In Re‐reading Levinas. Bernasconi, Robert and Critchley, Simon, eds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1953. Some reflections on the ego. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 34: 1117.Google ScholarPubMed
Lacan, Jacques. 1968. The phallic phase and the subjective import of the castration complex. In Feminine Sexuality: Jacques Lacan and the école freudienne, 99122. Mitchell, Juliet and Rose, Jacqueline, eds. London: Macmillan Press; New York: Norton: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1977. The mirror stage as formative of the function of the I as revealed in psychoanalytic experience. Écrits: A selection. Sheridan, Alan, trans. London: Tavistock; New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 1979. The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis. Sheridan, Alan, trans. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books; New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Laplanche, J., and Pontalis, J‐B. 1983. The language of psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press; New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel, and Kearney, Richard. 1986. Dialogue with Emmanuel Levinas. In Face to face with Levinas. Cohen, Richard A., ed. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1978. Existence and existents. Lingis, Alphonso, trans. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-017-1516-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1979. Totality and Infinity. Lingis, Alphonso, trans. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.10.1007/978-94-009-9342-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1981. Otherwise than being or beyond essence. Lingis, Alphonso, trans. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1987. Time and the Other. Cohen, Richard A., trans. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. 1988. Useless suffering. In The provocation of Levinas. Bernasconi, Robert and Wood, David, eds. London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Lingis, Alphonso. 1986. The sensuality and the sensitivity. In Face to face with Levinas. Cohen, Richard A., ed. Albany, Sate University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D., ed. 1931. The works of Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Whitford, Margaret. 1986. Luce Irigaray and the female imaginary: Speaking as a woman. Radical Philosophy (Summer): 38.Google Scholar
Whitford, Margaret. 1989. Rereading Irigaray. In Between feminism and psychoanalysis. Brennan, Teresa, ed. London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wright, Tamra, Hughes, Peter, and Ainsley, Alison. 1988. The paradox of morality: An interview with Emmanuel Levinas. In The provocation of Levinas. Bernasconi, Robert and Wood, David, eds. London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar