Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T07:17:07.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language and the Gendered Body: Butler's Early Reading of Merleau‐Ponty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Anna Petronella Foultier
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Through a close reading of Judith Butler's 1989 essay on Merleau‐Ponty's “theory” of sexuality as well as the texts her argument hinges on, this paper addresses the debate about the relation between language and the living, gendered body as it is understood by defenders of poststructural theory on the one hand, and different interpretations of Merleau‐Ponty's phenomenology on the other. I claim that Butler, in her criticism of the French philosopher's analysis of the famous “Schneider case,” does not take its wider context into account: either the case study that Merleau‐Ponty's discussion is based upon, or its role in his phenomenology of perception. Yet, although Butler does point out certain blind spots in his descriptions regarding the gendered body, it is in the light of her questioning that the true radicality of Merleau‐Ponty's ideas can be revealed. A further task for feminist phenomenology should be a thorough assessment of his philosophy from this angle, once the most obvious misunderstandings have been put to the side.

Type
Open Issue Content
Information
Hypatia , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , Fall 2013 , pp. 767 - 783
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am indebted to the anonymous referees of Hypatia for valuable comments on this article.

References

Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2000a. Philosophy matters: A review of recent work in feminist philosophy. Signs 25 (3): 841–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2000b. Phenomenology, post‐structuralism, and feminist theory on the concept of experience. In Feminist phenomenology, eds. Fisher, Linda and Embree, Lester. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1995. Feminism and postmodernism: An uneasy alliance. In Benhabib, Seyla, Butler, Judith, Cornell, Drucilla and Fraser, Nancy, Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bigwood, Carol. 1991. Renaturalizing the body (with the help of Merleau‐Ponty). Hypatia 6 (3): 54–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1992. Postmodern subjects, postmodern bodies (Review essay). Feminist Studies 18 (1): 159–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1993. Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1998. Bringing body to theory. In Body and flesh: A philosophical reader, ed. Welton, Donn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1986. Sex and gender in Simone de Beauvoir's Second Sex. In Simone de Beauvoir: Witness to a century, ed. Vivienne Wenzel, Hélène, Yale French Studies 72: 35–49.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1988. Performative acts and gender constitution: An essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal 40 (4): 519–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1989. Sexual ideology and phenomenological description: A feminist critique of Merleau‐Ponty's Phenomenology of Perception. In The thinking muse: Feminism and modern French philosophy, eds. Allen, Jeffner and Marion Young, Iris. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990/1999. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.” New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997a. Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1997b. Postskriptum, April 1997. In Phänomenologie und Geschlechterdifferenz, ed. Stoller, Silvia and Vetter, Helmuth. Vienna: WUV‐Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2004. Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2006. Sexual difference as a question of ethics: Alterities of the flesh in Irigaray and Merleau‐Ponty. In Feminist interpretations of Maurice Merleau‐Ponty, eds. Olkowski, Dorothea and Weiss, Gail. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Linda, and Embree, Lester eds. 2000. Feminist phenomenology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Linda. 2000. Phenomenology and feminism: Perspectives on their relation. In Feminist phenomenology, eds. Fisher, Linda and Embree, Lester. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun. 1986. Body image and body schema: A conceptual clarification. Journal of Mind and Behavior 7 (4): 541–54.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun. 1995. Body schema and intentionality. In The body and the self, eds. Luis Bermúdez, José, Marcel, Anthony and Eilan, Naomi. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Shaun. 2005. How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendlin, E. T. 1992. The primacy of the body, not the primacy of perception. Man and World 25 (3‐4): 341–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Kurt, and Gelb, Adhémar. 1917. Psychologische Analysen hirnpathologischer Fälle auf Grund von Untersuchungen Hirnverletzter, I. Zur Psychologie des optischen Wahrnehmungs‐ und Erkennungsvorganges. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie 41 (1): 1–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Kurt. 1924/1971. Über Farbennamenamnesie. In Selected papers/Ausgewählte Schriften, eds. Gurwitsch, Aron, Goldstein Haudek, Else M. and Haudek, William E.The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Kurt. 1931/1971. Über Zeigen und Greifen. In Selected papers/Ausgewählte Schriften, eds. Gurwitsch, Aron, Goldstein Haudek, Else M. and Haudek, William E., The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Kurt. 1934. Der Aufbau des Organismus: Einführung in die Biologie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Erfahrungen am kranken Menschen. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Kurt. 1939/1995. The organism: A holistic approach to biology, derived from pathological data in man. New York: Zone Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Kurt. 1967. Kurt Goldstein. In A history of psychology in autobiography, vol. V, eds. Boring, Edwin G. and Lindzey, Gardner, New York: Appleton‐Century‐Crofts.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1993. Merleau‐Ponty and Irigaray in the flesh. Thesis Eleven 36: 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 1994. Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Head, Henry. 1920. Studies in neurology, vol II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heinämaa, Sara. 1997. What is a woman? Butler and Beauvoir on the foundations of the sexual difference. Hypatia 12 (1): 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinämaa, Sara. 2002. Toward a phenomenology of sexual difference: Husserl, Merleau‐Ponty, Beauvoir. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Heinämaa, Sara, and Rodemeyer, Lanei. 2010. Introduction. Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochheimer, Wolfgang. 1932. Psychologische Analysen hirnpathologischer Fälle, XIII. Analyse eines “Seelenblinden” von der Sprache aus: Ein Beitrag zur Frage nach der Bedeutung der Sprache für das Verhalten zur Umwelt. Psychologie Forschung 16 (12): 1–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1971/1976. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie: Erstes Buch, Husserliana, Band III. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1982. Collected works, vol. 2, Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: First book. Trans. F. Kersten. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Rasmus Thybo. 2009. Motor intentionality and the case of Schneider. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (3): 371–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice. 1945. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice. 1968. Résumés de cours. Collège de France 1952–1960. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice. 1970. Themes from the lectures at the Collège de France 1952–1960. Trans. John O'Neill. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau‐Ponty, Maurice. 2012. Phenomenology of perception. Trans. Donald A. Landes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oksala, Johanna. 2006. A phenomenology of gender. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (3): 229–44.Google Scholar
Schilder, Paul. 1923. Das Körperschema: Ein Beitrag zur Lehre vom Bewusstsein des eigenen Körpers. Berlin: J. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilder, Paul. 1935/1999. The image and appearance of the human body: Studies in the constructive energies of the psyche. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan W. 1992. “Experience.” In Feminists theorize the political, eds. Butler, Judith and Scott, Joan W. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Steinfeld, J. 1927. Ein Beitrag zur Analyse der Sexualfunktion. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie 107: 172–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoller, Silvia. 2000. Reflections on feminist Merleau‐Ponty skepticism. Hypatia 15 (1): 175–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoller, Silvia. 2008. Konstruktionen von Geschlecht: Wiederholung und Wiederaufnahme bei Butler und Merleau‐Ponty. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 70 (3): 563–88.Google Scholar
Stoller, Silvia. 2009. Phenomenology and the post‐structural critique of experience. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (5): 739–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoller, Silvia. 2010a. Expressivity and performativity: Merleau‐Ponty and Butler. Continental Philosophy Review 43: 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoller, Silvia. 2010b. Existenz – Differenz – Konstruktion: Phänomenologie der Geschlechtlichkeit bei Beauvoir, Irigaray und Butler. Paderborn: Fink.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoller, Silvia, and Vetter, Helmuth, eds. 1997. Phänomenologie und Geschlechterdifferenz. Vienna: WUV‐Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Stoller, Silvia, Vasterling, Veronica, and Fisher, Linda, eds. 2005. Feministische Phänomenologie und Hermeneutik. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Shannon. 1997. Domination and dialogue in Merleau‐Ponty's Phenomenology of Perception. Hypatia 12 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasterling, Veronica. 1999. Butler's sophisticated constructivism: A critical assessment. Hypatia 14 (3): 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasterling, Veronica. 2003. Body and language: Butler, Merleau‐Ponty and Lyotard on the speaking embodied subject. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (2): 205–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar