Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T00:42:32.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Politics of Difference and Nationalism: On Iris Young's Global Vision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Abstract

Iris Marion Young's politics of difference promotes equality among socially and culturally different groups within multicultural states and advocates group autonomy to empower such groups to develop their own voice. Extending the politics of difference to the international sphere, Young advocates “decentered diverse democratic federalism” that combines local self-determination and cosmopolitanism, while adamantly rejecting nationalism. Herr argues that nationalism, charitably interpreted, is not only consistent with Young's politics of difference but also necessary for realizing Young's ideal in the global arena.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

All things considered, NPR. 2007. Iranian women activists gain momentum. March 17. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.phpstoryld=8959110.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles. 1979/1999. Political theory and international relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles. Human rights as a common concern. American Political Science Review 95 (June 2001): 269–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deveaux, Monique. 2000. Conflicting equalities? 32 48: 522–39.Google Scholar
D'Errico, Peter. 2001. Native Americans in America. In American nations, ed. Hoxie, Frederick E., Mancall, Peter. C., and Merrell, James H.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Forbis, Melissa. 2003. Hacia la autonomia: Zapatista women developing a New World. In Women of Chiapas: Making history in times of struggle and hope, ed. Eber, Christine and Kovic, Christine. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Freedman, Jane. 2004. Secularism as a barrier to integration? The French dilemma. 32 42: 528.Google Scholar
Held, David. 1995. Democracy and the global order. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Herbert, H. J. 2006. Utah tribe divided over radioactive waste storage. Associated Press, June 25, http://www.shundahai.org/6/‐25/‐06InsideBayArea_Utah_Tribe_Divided_Over_Radioactive_Waste_Storage.htm.Google Scholar
Herr, Ranjoo. 2003. The possibility of nationalist feminism. Hypatia 18 (3): 135–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herr, Ranjoo. 2004. A third world feminist defense of multiculturalism. 32 30: 73103.Google Scholar
Herr, Ranjoo. 2006. In defense of non‐liberal nationalism. Political Theory 34 (3): 304–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herr, Ranjoo. 2008. Cultural claims and the limits of liberal democracy. Social Theory and Practice 34 (1): 2548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivison, Duncan, Patton, Paul, and Sanders, Will, eds. 2000. Political theory and the rights of indigenous peoples. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Killian, Caitlin. 2003. The other side of the veil: North African women in France respond to the headscarf affair. 32 17: 567–90.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural citizenship. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 2001. The theory and practice of immigrant multiculturalism. Politics in the vernacular: Nationalism, multiculturalism, and citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leicester, John. 2003. Muslim women march against scarf ban. Associated Press, December 13.Google Scholar
Miller, David. 1995. On nationality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. 1992. Cosmopolitanism and sovereignty Ethics 103 (1): 4875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, Thomas. 2002. World poverty and human rights. Malden, Mass.: Polity.Google Scholar
Read, Jen'nan Ghazal, and Bartkowski, John. 2000. To veil or not to veil? A case study of identity negotiation among Muslim women in Austin, Texas. 32 14: 395417.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Margot. 2006. Utah's toxic opportunity. Time, March 8, http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,1169904,00.html.Google Scholar
Simpson, Audra. 2000. Paths toward a Mohawk Nation. In Political theory and the rights of indigenous peoples, ed. Ivison, Patton, and Sanders, .Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony. 1983. Theories of nationalism. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Snipp, C. Matthew. 1996. The first Americans. In Origins and destinies, ed. Pedraza, Silvia and Rumbaut, Ruben. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1994. Thick and thin. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Beverly. 2004. Cloth on her head, constitution in hand: Germany's headscarf debates and the cultural politics of difference. 32 22: 3363.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000a. Self‐determination and global democracy. In Inclusion and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000b. Hybrid democracy: Iroquois federalism and the postcolonial project. In Political theory and the rights of indigenous peoples, ed. Ivison, Patton, and Sanders, .Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2001. Two concepts of self‐determination. In Human rights, ed. Sarat, Austin and Kearns, Thomas. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2007. Reflections on hegemony and global democracy. In Global challenges. Malden, Mass.: Polity.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion, with Archibugi, Daniele. 2007. Envisioning a global rule of law. In Global Challenges.Google Scholar