Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T10:44:56.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pragmatists Jane Addams and John Dewey Inform the Ethic of Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

M. Regina Leffers
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Both Jane Addams and John Dewey see human beings as ultimately creative in nature and as radically connected to each other. In this paper I look to these ideas to provide a theoretical model that is able to explain why we are able to extend our care to others outside of our intimate circle of family and friends, and to show us how we can purposefully move to the next higher level of moral reasoning.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 8 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Feminism and Pragmatism , Spring 1993 , pp. 64 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addams, Jane [1910] 1981. Twenty Years at Hull‐House. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1987. The generalized and the concrete other: The Kohlberg‐Gilligan controversy and moral theory. In Women and moral theory. See Kittay and Meyers.Google Scholar
Curti, Merle. 1961. Jane Addams on human nature. Journal of the History of Ideas 22(April‐June): 240–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Allen F. 1973. American heroine: The life and legend of Jane Addams. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deegan, Mary Jo. 1990. Jane Addams and the men of the Chicago School, 1892–1918. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1925] 1988. Experience and nature. Reprinted in John Dewey, The later works, Vol. 1: 1925–1953, ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1929] 1984. The quest for certainty. Reprinted in John Dewey, The later works, Vol. 4: 1925–1953, ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1932] 1989. Ethics. Reprinted in John Dewey, The later works, Vol. 7: 1925–1953, ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John [1934] 1987. Art as experience. Reprinted in John Dewey, The Later Works, Vol. 10: 1925–1953, ed. Jo Ann Boydston. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1938. Experience and education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1987. Moral orientation and moral development. In Women and moral theory. See Kittay and Meyers.Google Scholar
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. 1979. Herland. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Hayden, Dolores. 1981. The grand domestic revolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Houston, Barbara. 1987. Rescuing womanly virtues: Some dangers of moral reclamation. In Science, morality and feminist theory, eds. Hanen, Marsha and Nielsen, Kai. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supplementary volume 13: 237–62.Google Scholar
James, William. 1950. The principles of psychology. Vols. 1 and 2. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
James, William. 1958. Talks to teachers on psychology and to students on some of life's ideals. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder and Meyers, Diana T., eds. 1987. Women and moral theory. Totawa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, Lawrence, Levine, Charles, and Hewar, Alexandra. 1983. Moral stages: A current formulation and response to critics. New York: Karger.Google Scholar
Levine, Daniel. 1971. Jane Addams and the liberal tradition. Madison: State Historical Society of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Lynd, Staughton. 1961. Jane Addams and the radical impulse. Commentary 32(July): 54–59.Google Scholar
McDermott, John J., ed. 1977. The writings of William James. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1977. The conditions for work: The common world of women. In On lies, secrets, and silence. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1984a. Maternal thinking. In Mothering: Essays in feminist theory, ed. Trebilcot, Joyce. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1984b. Preservative love and military destruction: Some reflections on mothering and peace. In Mothering: Essays in feminist theory, ed. Trebilcot, Joyce. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1987. Remarks on the sexual politics of reason. In Women and moral theory. See Kittay and Meyers.Google Scholar
Rudnick, Lois. 1991. A feminist American success myth: Jane Addams's Twenty years at Hull‐House. In Traditions and the talents of women, ed. Howe, Florence. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock. 1989. Pragmatism, feminism, and sensitivity to context. In Who cares? ed. Brabeck, Mary M.New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock. 1990. William James's radical reconstruction of philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan C. 1989. Women and caring: What can feminists learn about morality from caring. In Gender/body/knowledge: Feminist reconstructions of being and knowing, ed. Jaggar, Alison M. and Bordo, Susan R.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar