Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-15T03:05:14.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Response to Donald Koch's “Recipes, Cooking and Conflict”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

This paper addresses Koch's concern about whether a coresponsible theorist can engage in inquiry with a theorist who is “beyond the pale.” On what grounds, he ash, can a coresponsible inquirer argue against one who uses a racist, sexist, or classist model for inquiry? 1 argue that, in such situations, the coresponsible inquirer brings to inquiry both a theoretical framework, or “attitude,” and a set of practical concerns which manifest that attitude.

Type
Comment/Reply
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Heldke, Lisa. 1989. Foundationalism and retatlvism: The issue for feminism. APA Newsletter on Feminism and Philosophy 88 (2): 3942.Google Scholar
Heldke, Lisa. 1988. Recipes for theory making. Hypatia 3 (2): 1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, Donald. 1990. Recipes, cooking and conflict: A response to Heldke's “Recipes for Theory Making.” Hypatia 5 (1): 156164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical investigations. Anscombe, G.E.M., trans. New York: Macmillan. Abbreviated PI.Google Scholar