Skip to main content Accessibility help

Adoption of infection prevention and control practices by healthcare workers in Québec: A qualitative study

  • Eve Dubé (a1) (a2), Armelle Lorcy (a2), Nathalie Audy (a3), Nadia Desmarais (a3), Patrice Savard (a4) (a5), Chantal Soucy (a5), Samuel Bassetto (a6), Mathilde Rajon (a6) (a7), Fabrice Brunet (a5), Caroline Barbir (a3) and Caroline Quach (a3) (a4)...



To describe barriers and facilitators to the adoption of recommended infection prevention and control (IPC) practices among healthcare workers (HCWs).


A qualitative research design was used. Individual semistructured interviews with HCWs and observations of clinical practices were conducted from February to May 2018 in 8 care units of 2 large tertiary-care hospitals in Montreal (Québec, Canada).


We interviewed 13 managers, 4 nurses, 2 physicians, 3 housekeepers, and 2 medical laboratory technologists. We conducted 7 observations by following IPC nurses (n = 3), nurses (n = 2), or patient attendants (n = 2) in their work routines. Barriers to IPC adoption were related to the context of care, workplace environment issues, and communication issues. The main facilitator of the IPC adoption by HCWs was the “development of an IPC culture or safety culture.” The “IPC culture” relied upon leadership support by managers committed to IPC, shared belief in the importance of IPC measures to limit healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), collaboration and good communication among staff, as well as proactivity and ownership of IPC measures (ie, development of local solutions to reduce HAIs and “working together” toward common goals).


Adoption of recommended IPC measures by HCWs is strongly influenced by the “IPC culture.” The IPC culture was not uniform within hospital and differences in IPC culture were identified between care units.


Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Eve Dubé, Email:


Hide All
1. World Health Organization (WHO), , Ducel, G, Fabry, J, Nicolle, L. Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Infections—A Practical Guide. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
2. World Health Organization (WHO). Antimicrobial resistance: global report on surveillance. 2014.
3. Maciosek, MV, Coffield, AB, Edwards, NM, Flottemesch, TJ, Goodman, MJ, Solberg, LI. Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: results of a systematic review and analysis. Am J Prevent Med 2006;31:5261.
4. Standard precautions in health care. World Health Organization website. Published 2007. Accessed September 9, 2019.
5. Health and Safety Commission. Third Report: Organizing for Safety, ACSNI Study Group on Human Factors. London: HMSO; 1993.
6. Quinn Patton, M. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2014.
7. Halligan, M, Zecevic, A. Safety culture in healthcare: a review of concepts, dimensions, measures and progress. BMJ Qual Safety 2011;20:338343.
8. Reed, J. Appreciative Inquiry: Research for Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007.
9. Reed, J, Turner, J. Appreciating change in cancer services—an evaluation’of service development strategies. J Health Organ Manag 2005;19:163176.
10. Kavanagh, T, Stevens, B, Kennedy, C. Process evaluation of appreciative inquiry to translate pain management evidence into pediatric nursing practice. Implement Sci 2010;5:90.
11. Watkins, S, Dewar, B, Kennedy, C. Appreciative inquiry as an intervention to change nursing practice in in-patient settings: an integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud 2016;60:179190.
12. Yoon, MN, Lowe, M, Budgell, M, Steele, CM. An exploratory investigation using appreciative inquiry to promote nursing oral care. Geriatr Nurs 2011;32:326340.
13. Richards, L. Handling Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2010.
14. Strauss, AL, Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
15. Buick, S, Joffe, AM, Taylor, G, Conly, J. A consensus development conference model for establishing health policy for surveillance and screening of antimicrobial-resistant organisms. Clin Infect Dis 2015;60:10951101.
16. Bernard, L, Bernard, A, Biron, A, Lavoie-Tremblay, M. Exploring Canadians’ and Europeans’ healthcare professionals’ perception of biological risks, patient safety, and professionals’ safety practices. Health Care Manag 2017;36:129139.
17. Hessels, AJ, Genovese-Schek, V, Agarwal, M, Wurmser, T, Larson, EL. Relationship between patient safety climate and adherence to standard precautions. Am J Infect Control 2016;44:11281132.
18. Dixon-Woods, M, Leslie, M, Bion, J, Tarrant, C. What counts? An ethnographic study of infection data reported to a patient safety program. Milbank Qtrly 2012;90:548591.
19. Singer, S, Lin, S, Falwell, A, Gaba, D, Baker, L. Relationship of safety climate and safety performance in hospitals. Health Serv Res 2009;44:399421.
20. Blegen, MA, Sehgal, NL, Alldredge, BK, Gearhart, S, Auerbach, AA, Wachter, RM. Improving safety culture on adult medical units through multidisciplinary teamwork and communication interventions: the TOPS Project. Qual Safety Health Care 2010;19:346350.
21. Bernard, L, Biron, A, Lavigne, G, et al. An exploratory study of safety culture, biological risk management and hand hygiene of healthcare professionals. J Adv Nursing 2018;74:827837.
22. Antimicrobial resistance—tailored antimicrobial resistance programmes to support behavioural change in the region. World Health Organization website. Published 2018. Accessed September 9, 2019.
23. Malterud, K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 2001;358:483488.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Adoption of infection prevention and control practices by healthcare workers in Québec: A qualitative study

  • Eve Dubé (a1) (a2), Armelle Lorcy (a2), Nathalie Audy (a3), Nadia Desmarais (a3), Patrice Savard (a4) (a5), Chantal Soucy (a5), Samuel Bassetto (a6), Mathilde Rajon (a6) (a7), Fabrice Brunet (a5), Caroline Barbir (a3) and Caroline Quach (a3) (a4)...


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.