Skip to main content
×
×
Home

A Comprehensive Approach to Percutaneous Injury Prevention During Phlebotomy: Results of a Multicenter Study, 1993-1995

  • Francisco Alvarado-Ramy (a1), Elise M. Beltrami (a1), Louise J. Short (a1), Pamela U. Srivastava (a1), Keith Henry (a2), Meryl Mendelson (a3), Julie L. Gerberding (a4), George L. Delclos (a5), Scott Campbell (a1), Robin Solomon (a3), Rita Fahrner (a4), David H. Culver (a1), David Bell (a1), Denise M. Cardo (a1) and Mary E. Chamberland (a1)...
Abstract
Objective:

To examine a comprehensive approach for preventing percutaneous injuries associated with phlebotomy procedures.

Design and Setting:

From 1993 through 1995, personnel at 10 university-affiliated hospitals enhanced surveillance and assessed underreporting of percutaneous injuries; selected, implemented, and evaluated the efficacy of phlebotomy devices with safety features (ie, engineered sharps injury prevention devices [ESIPDs]); and assessed healthcare worker satisfaction with ESIPDs. Investigators also evaluated the preventability of a subset of percutaneous injuries and conducted an audit of sharps disposal containers to quantify activation rates for devices with safety features.

Results:

The three selected phlebotomy devices with safety features reduced percutaneous injury rates compared with conventional devices. Activation rates varied according to ease of use, healthcare worker preference for ESIPDs, perceived “patient adverse events,” and device-specific training.

Conclusions:

Device-specific features and healthcare worker training and involvement in the selection of ESIPDs affect the activation rates for ESIPDs and therefore their efficacy. The implementation of ESIPDs is a useful measure in a comprehensive program to reduce percutaneous injuries associated with phlebotomy procedures.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mailstop E-68, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333
References
Hide All
1.U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Table B-1: employees on nonfarm payrolls by industry. In: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. The Employment Situation: April 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, 2002. Available at http://stats.bls.gov/news.release/empsittll.htm. Accessed June 29,2002.
2.Panlilio, AL, Cardo, DM, Campbell, S, et al. Estimate of the annual number of percutaneous injuries in U.S. healthcare workers. In: Program and Abstracts of the 4th Decennial International Conference on Nosocomial and Healthcare-Associated Infections. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2000:60. Abstract S-T2-01.
3.Cardo, DM, Culver, DH, Ciesielski, CA, et al. A case-control study of HIV seroconversion in health care workers after percutaneous exposure. N Engl J Med 1997;337:14851490.
4.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Documented and possible occupationally acquired AIDS/HIV infection, by occupation. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report. 2000;12:24.
5.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Evaluation of safety devices for preventing percutaneous injuries among health-care workers during phlebotomy procedures: Minneapolis-St. Paul, New York City, and San Francisco, 1993-1995. MMWR 1997;46:2125.
6.Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens', needlestick and other sharps injuries: final rule. Federal Register 2001;66:53185325.
7.Chiarello, LA, Bartley, J. Prevention of blood exposure in healthcare personnel. Seminars in Infection Control 2001;1:3043.
8.Mendelson, MH, Solomon, R, Bailey, E, Chen, L, McCarthy, D. Efficacy of a “safety” winged steel needle in preventing percutaneous injuries (Pis) in healthcare workers. Presented at the 8th Annual Meeting of the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; 1998; Orlando, FL. Abstract 35.
9.Chiarello, LA. Selection of needlestick prevention devices: a conceptual framework for approaching product evaluation. Am J Infect Control 1995;23:386395.
10.Hamory, BH. Underreporting of needlestick injuries in a university hospital. Am J Infect Control 1983;11:174177.
11.Alvarado, F, Panlilio, A, Cardo, D. Percutaneous injury reporting in U.S. hospitals, 1998. In: Program and Abstracts of the 4th Decennial International Conference on Nosocomial and Healthcare-Associated Infictions. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2000:118. Abstract P-S2-38.
12.Gershon, R, Pearse, L, Grimes, M, Flanagan, P, Vlahov, D. The impact of multifocused interventions on sharps injury rates at an acute-care hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:806811.
13.Zafar, A, Butler, C, Podgorny, J, Mennonna, P, Gaydos, L, Sandiford, J. Effect of a comprehensive program to reduce needlestick injuries. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:712715.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
  • ISSN: 0899-823X
  • EISSN: 1559-6834
  • URL: /core/journals/infection-control-and-hospital-epidemiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed