Skip to main content
×
Home

Prospective, Controlled, Cross-Over Trial of Alcohol-Based Hand Gel in Critical Care Units

  • Mark E. Rupp (a1) (a2), Teresa Fitzgerald (a2), Susan Puumala (a3), James R. Anderson (a3), Rita Craig (a2), Peter C. Iwen (a4), Dawn Jourdan (a2), Janet Keuchel (a2), Nedra Marion (a2), Delayne Peterson (a5), Lee Sholtz (a2) and Valerie Smith (a2)...
Abstract
Background.

There are limited data from prospective studies to indicate whether improvement in hand hygiene associated with the use of alcohol-based hand hygiene products results in improved patient outcomes.

Design.

A 2-year, prospective, controlled, cross-over trial of alcohol-based hand gel.

Setting.

The study was conducted in 2 medical-surgical ICUs for adults, each with 12 beds, from August 2001 to September 2003 at a university-associated, tertiary care teaching hospital.

Methods.

An alcohol-based hand gel was provided in one critical care unit and not provided in the other. After 1 year, the assignment was reversed. The hand hygiene adherence rate and the incidence of nosocomial infection were monitored. Samples for culture were obtained from nurses' hands every 2 months.

Results.

During 17,994 minutes of observation, which included 3,678 opportunities for hand hygiene, adherence rates improved dramatically after the introduction of hand gel, increasing from 37% to 68% in one unit and from 38% to 69% in the other unit (P < .001). Improvement was observed among all groups of healthcare workers. Hand hygiene rates were better at higher workloads when hand gel was available in the unit (P = .02). No substantial change in the rates of device-associated infection, infection due to multidrug-resistant pathogens, or infection due to Clostridium difficile was observed. Culture of samples from the hands of nursing staff revealed that an increased number of microbes and an increased number of microbe species was associated with longer fingernails (ie, more than 2 mm long), the wearing of rings, and/or lack of access to hand gel.

Conclusions.

The introduction of alcohol-based gel resulted in a significant and sustained improvement in the rate of hand hygiene adherence. Fingernail length greater than 2 mm, wearing rings, and lack of access to hand gel were associated with increased microbial carriage on the hands. This improvement in the hand hygiene adherence rate was not associated with detectable changes in the incidence of healthcare-associated infection.

Copyright
Corresponding author
984031 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-4031 (merupp@unmc.edu)
References
Hide All
1.Jarvis WR. Selected aspects of the socioeconomic impact of nosocomial infections: morbidity, mortality, cost, and prevention. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:552557.
2.Alonso-Echanove J, Gaynes RRScope and Magnitude of Nosocomial ICU Infections. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.
3.Pittet D, Boyce JM. Hand hygiene and patient care: pursuing the Semmelweis legacy. Lancet Infect Dis 2001;1:919.
4.Voss A, Widmer ARNo time for handwashing? Handwashing versus alcoholic rub: can we afford 100% compliance? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:205208.
5.O'Boyle CA, Henly SJ, Larson E. Understanding adherence to hand hygiene recommendations: the theory of planned behavior. Am J Infect Control 2001;29:352360.
6.Boyce JM, Pittet D. Guideline for hand hygiene in health-care settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23(12 suppl):S340.
7.US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System Manual. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1999.
8.Paulson DS, Fendler EJ, Dolan MJ, Williams RA. A close look at alcohol gel as an antimicrobial sanitizing agent. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:332338.
9.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Abbreviated Identification of Bacteria and Yeast: Approved Guideline. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2002: M35A.
10.Pittet D, Mourouga P, Perneger TV. Compliance with handwashing in a teaching hospital. Infection Control Program. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:126130.
11.Larson E, Kretzer EK. Compliance with handwashing and barrier precautions. J Hosp Infect 1995;30(suppl):88106.
12.Watanakunakorn C, Wang C, Hazy J. An observational study of hand washing and infection control practices by healthcare workers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:858860.
13.Daniels IR, Rees BI. Handwashing: simple, but effective. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1999;81:117118.
14.Tibballs J. Teaching hospital medical staff to handwash. Med IA ust 1996;164:395398.
15.Boyce JM. It is time for action: improving hand hygiene in hospitals. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:153155.
16.Kownatzki E. Hand hygiene and skin health. J Hosp Infect 2003;55:239245.
17.Bischoff WE, Reynolds TM, Sessler CN, Edmond MB, Wenzel RRHandwashing compliance by health care workers: the impact of introducing an accessible, alcohol-based hand antiseptic. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:10171021.
18.Maury E, Alzieu M, Baudei JL, et al.Availability of an alcohol solution can improve hand disinfection compliance in an intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:324327.
19.Kohan C, Ligi C, Dumigan DG, Boyce JM. The importance of evaluating product dispensers when selecting alcohol-based handrubs. Am J Infect Control 2002;30:373375.
20.Widmer AE, Dangei M. Alcohol-based handrub: evaluation of technique and microbiological efficacy with international infection control professionals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:207209.
21.Recommendations for preventing the spread of vancomycin resistance. Recommendations of the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). MMWR Recomm Rep 1995;44(RR-12):113.
22.Muto CA, Jernigan JA, Ostrowsky BE, et al.SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and enterococcus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:362386.
23.Jones RD, Jampani HB, Newman JL, Lee AS. Triclosan: a review of effectiveness and safety in health care settings. Am J Infect Control 2000;28:184–96.
24.Hoang TT, Schweizer HP. Characterization of Pseudomonas aeruginosa enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase (FabI): a target for the antimicrobial triclosan and its role in acylated homoserine lactone synthesis. J Bacteriol 1999;181:54895497.
25.Chuanchuen R, Beinlich K, Hoang TT, Becher A, Karkhoff-Schweizer RR, Schweizer HP. Cross-resistance between triclosan and antibiotics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is mediated by multidrug efflux pumps: exposure of a susceptible mutant strain to triclosan selects nfxB mutants overexpressing MexCD-OprJ. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001;45:428432.
26.Heath RJ, Rock CO. A triclosan-resistant bacterial enzyme. Nature 2000;406:145146.
27.World Health Organization (WHO). World Alliance for Patient Safety. WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care (Advanced Draft). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2006.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
  • ISSN: 0899-823X
  • EISSN: 1559-6834
  • URL: /core/journals/infection-control-and-hospital-epidemiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 18 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 454 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.