Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

ACCOUNTABILITY MECHANISMS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS BY CSDP MISSIONS: AVAILABLE AND SUFFICIENT?

  • Stian Øby Johansen (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

This article demonstrates that it is doubtful whether the accountability mechanisms available in connection with operative missions conducted under the EU's Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) provide a sufficient level of protection when human rights are violated. The assessment of the CSDP accountability mechanisms—the Court of Justice of the European Union, domestic courts of EU Member States, and other mechanisms at the international level—is conducted in light of the requirements laid down in Article 13 of the European Convention of Human Rights. The consequences of the insufficiency of these mechanisms for the EU's accession to the ECHR are also touched upon.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

C Eckes , ‘EU Accession to the ECHR: Between Autonomy and Adaptation’ (2013) 76 MLR 254

P Craig , The Lisbon Treaty: Law, Politics, and Treaty Reform (OUP 2010) 43

P Koutrakos , The EU Common Security and Defense Policy (OUP 2013) 35

F Mégret and F Hoffmann , ‘The UN as a Human Rights Violator? Some Reflections on the United Nations Changing Human Rights Responsibilities’ (2003) 25 HRQ 314

R Wilde , International Territorial Administration (OUP 2008) ch 1

F Naert , ‘The International Responsibility of the Union in the Context of Its CSDP Operations’ in MD Evans and P Koutrakos (eds), The International Responsibility of the European Union: European and International Perspectives (Hart 2013)

A Sari and RA Wessel , ‘International Responsibility for EU Military Operations: Finding the EU's Place in the Global Accountability Regime’ in B Van Vooren , S Blockmans and J Wouters (eds), The EU's Role in Global Governance (OUP 2013)

M Milanović and T Papić , ‘As Bad as It Gets: The European Court of Human Rights’ Behrami and Saramati Decision and General International Law’ (2009) 58 ICLQ 267

D Guilfoyle , ‘Counter-Piracy Law Enforcement and Human Rights’ (2010) 59 ICLQ 141, 160–8

KM Larsen , ‘Attribution of Conduct in Peace Operations: The ‘Ultimate Authority and Control’ Test’ (2008) 19 EJIL 509

M Milanović , Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties: Law, Principles, and Policy (OUP 2011) 1113

C Hillion , ‘A Powerless Court? The European Court of Justice and the Common Foreign and Security Policy’ in M Cremona and A Thies (eds), The European Court of Justice and External Relations Law: Constitutional Challenges (Hart 2014) 51–4

HG Schermers and NM Blokker , International Institutional Law: Unity within Diversity (5th edn, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2011) 1031

A Hinarejos , ‘Judicial Control of CFSP in the Constitution: A Cherry Worth Picking?’ (2006) 25 Yearbook of European Law 363

B Davies , ‘Segi and the Future of Judicial Rights Protection in the Third Pillar of the EU’ (2008) 14 European Public Law 311, 318

Johansen , ‘The Reinterpretation of TFEU Art 344 in Opinion 2/13 and Its Potential Consequences’ (2015) 16 German Law Journal 169

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International & Comparative Law Quarterly
  • ISSN: 0020-5893
  • EISSN: 1471-6895
  • URL: /core/journals/international-and-comparative-law-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 27
Total number of PDF views: 132 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 447 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 28th October 2016 - 26th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.