Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

THE EVOLUTION OF SHAREHOLDER AND CREDITOR PROTECTION IN AUSTRALIA: AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON

  • Helen Anderson (a1), Michelle Welsh (a2), Ian Ramsay (a3) and Peter Gahan (a4)
Abstract
Abstract

This article is part of a larger international investigation of the effects of a country's legal origins on the style of business regulation. We employ an innovative ‘leximetric’ methodology to numerically code the protective strength of Australian corporate law for both shareholder and creditor protection for the period 1970 to 2010. This leximetric methodology has been used in a prominent international debate concerning the development of legal rules and the effects of different styles of regulation on a range of economic outcomes—the legal origins debate. Drawing on similar data compiled by Armour, Deakin, Lele and Siems in five other countries (France, Germany, India, the UK and the US) for the period 1970 to 2005, we compare changes in the level of protection afforded to Australian shareholders and creditors with developments in other countries. Our analysis finds that in Australia there was a sustained upward trend in shareholder protection, but not in the case of creditor protection. Compared to the five other countries, the level of protection afforded to shareholders under Australian law was relatively high, and this was the case for the level of protection afforded to creditors as well. We also examine the extent of convergence and divergence in shareholder and creditor protection among the countries in the study. We find persistent divergence in shareholder protection, with the extent of divergence in 2005 similar to that in 1970. For creditor protection, we find increasing divergence among the countries over the period of study. Our findings are not supportive of legal origins theory.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

R La Porta et al, ‘Law and Finance’ (1998) 106 Journal of Political Economy 1113

L Bebchuk and M J Roe , ‘A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance’ (1999) 52 Stanford LRev 127

S Voigt , ‘Are International Merchants Stupid? Their Choice of Law Sheds Doubt on the Legal Origins Theory’ (2008) 5 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1

D Klerman and P Mahoney , ‘Legal Origins?’ (2007) 35 Journal of Comparative Economics 278

K Pistor , M Raiser and S Gelfer , ‘Law and Finance in Transition Economies’ (2000) 8 Economics of Transition 325, 327

J Armour et al, ‘Shareholder Protection and Stock Market Development: An Empirical Test of the Legal Origins Hypothesis’ (2009) 6 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 343, 349–50

S Deakin and P Sarkar , ‘Assessing the Long-run Economic Impact of Labour Law Systems: A Theoretical Reappraisal and Analysis of New Time-series Data’ (2008) 39 Industrial Relations Journal 453

EA Posner , ‘The Political Economy of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978’ (1997) 96 Michigan LRev 47

D Drezner , ‘Globalization and Policy Convergence’ (2001) 3 International Studies Review 53, 54

F Dobbin , B Simmons and G Garrett , ‘The Global Diffusion of Public Policies: Construction, Coercion, Competition or Learning?’ (2007) 33 Annual Review of Sociology 472, 458

C Knill , ‘Cross-national Policy Convergence: Concepts, Approaches and Explanatory Factors’ (2005) 12 Journal of European Public Policy 764

T Khanna , J Kogan and K Palepu , ‘Globalization and Similarities in Corporate Governance: A Cross-country Analysis’ (2006) 88 Review of Economics and Statistics 69

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International & Comparative Law Quarterly
  • ISSN: 0020-5893
  • EISSN: 1471-6895
  • URL: /core/journals/international-and-comparative-law-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×