Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Ginsburg, Tom 2012. Courts and New Democracies: Recent Works. Law & Social Inquiry, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 720.


    Köse, Melike Akkaraca 2012. Cyber Crime.


    Köse, Melike Akkaraca 2012. Cyber Crime.


    Köse, Melike Akkaraca 2011. Personal Data Privacy and Protection in a Surveillance Era.


    Tezcür, Güneş Murat 2009. Judicial Activism in Perilous Times: The Turkish Case. Law & Society Review, Vol. 43, Issue. 2, p. 305.


    Belge, Ceren 2006. Friends of the Court: The Republican Alliance and Selective Activism of the Constitutional Court of Turkey. Law <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&amp;"/> Society Review, Vol. 40, Issue. 3, p. 653.


    Koçan, Gürcan and Wigley, Simon 2005. Democracy and the Politics of Parliamentary Immunity in Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey, Vol. 33, p. 121.


    ×
  • International Journal of Middle East Studies, Volume 36, Issue 2
  • May 2004, pp. 253-275

A TALE OF TWO MAYORS: COURTS AND POLITICS IN IRAN AND TURKEY

  • Hootan Shambayati (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020743804362057
  • Published online: 01 May 2004
Abstract

Countries such as Iran and Turkey do not fit comfortably into the democratic and authoritarian categories. In these countries, elections are held regularly, and the will of the people is accepted as one source of sovereignty. At the same time, both constitutionally and in practice the elected officials have to share the exercise of political power with institutions that do not draw their power directly from the will of the people. In such systems, the judiciary has two important political functions. First, the judiciary acts as a politically insulated decision-maker through which the unelected head can exercise some degree of control over the actions of the elected head. Second, the judiciary's direct involvement in the political arena increases political tensions and legitimates the continuation of the two-headed system. In systems based on divided sovereignty, the tensions created by the judicialization of politics contribute to the stability of the regime.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Middle East Studies
  • ISSN: 0020-7438
  • EISSN: 1471-6380
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-middle-east-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×