Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-ssw5r Total loading time: 0.279 Render date: 2022-08-18T04:34:29.730Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

CAPITALIST BINATIONALISM IN MANDATORY PALESTINE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2011

Abstract

In response to the outbreak of the Arab Revolt of 1936, a coterie of five prominent entrepreneurs and intellectuals in the Mandatory Jewish community formulated a capitalist binationalist resolution of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. This paper examines the genesis of and debate over the little-known Concord they proposed and compares it with better-known liberal and socialist binationalist plans. “The Five,” as they came to be known, were the only binationalists seeking to base political parity on economic integration. The occasion of their blueprint allows further exploration of the preconditions for an effective binationalist program, among them the structure of labor markets, political preferences of minorities and majorities in regard to sovereignty, and levels of mutual trust. Ultimately, binationalist resolutions of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict were precluded by the Labor Settlement Movement's separatist state-building strategy.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

Authors’ note: I thank Omri Metzer, Keren-Or Schlesinger, and Irina Zimakov for their help in locating source materials and Michael Shalev for his continuous and unfailing encouragement.

1 Hattis, Susan Lee, The Bi-National Idea in Palestine During Mandatory Times (Tel Aviv: Shikmona, 1970), 47Google Scholar.

2 Ibid., 40–41.

3 Heller, Joseph, The Birth of Israel, 1945–1949: Ben Gurion and His Critics (Gainsville, Fla.: University Press of Florida, 2000), 161Google Scholar.

4 Loftus, P. J., National Income of Palestine 1944 (Jerusalem: Government Printer, Palestine, 1946), 24Google Scholar.

5 Metzer, Jacob, The Divided Economy of Mandatory Palestine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 8, 1617, 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Owen, Roger, Studies in the Economic and Social History of Palestine in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (London: Macmillan, 1982), 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lockman, Zachary, Comrades and Enemies (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1996)Google Scholar.

7 Metzer, Divided Economy, 20, 170, 172.

8 Ibid., 130–31, 175.

9 Shafir, Gershon, Land, Labor, and the Origins of the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict, 1882–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 4590Google Scholar.

10 See Bonacich, Edna, “A Theory of Ethnic Antagonism: The Split Labor Market,” American Sociological Review 37 (1972): 547–59CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; and Peled, Yoav and Shafir, Gershon, “Split Labor Market and the State: The Effect of Modernization on Jewish Industrial Workers in Tsarist Russia,” American Journal of Sociology 92 (1987): 1435–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Shafir, Land, Labor; Shalev, Michael, Labor and the Political Economy in Israel (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992), 3234, 317–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Grinberg, Lev, Split Corporatism in Israel (Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1991), 3032, 131Google Scholar; Bernstein, Deborah, “Expanding the Split Labor Market Theory: Between and Within Sectors of the Split Labor Market of Mandatory Palestine,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 38 (1996): 243–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Sussman, Zvi, Paʿar ve-Shiṿyon ba-Histadrut (Differentials and Equality within the Histadrut) (Ramat-Gan, Israel: Massada, 1974)Google Scholar; Metzer, Divided Economy, 123, 127.

13 Shafir, Land, Labor, 198.

14 Metzer, Divided Economy, 131–33.

15 Ibid., 106, 198–99.

16 Plessner, Yakir, The Political Economy of Israel (Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1994), 6364Google Scholar.

17 Shapiro, Yonathan, The Formative Years of the Israeli Labor Party: The Organization of Power, 1919–1930 (London: Sage, 1976), 126–28Google Scholar.

18 Fredrickson, George, White Supremacy: A Comparative Study of American and South African History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981), 6567Google Scholar; Davenport, T. R. H., South Africa: A Modern History, 2nd ed. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978), 2021Google Scholar.

19 Willard, Myra, History of the White Australia Policy to 1920 (New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1968), 45, 119–34Google Scholar.

20 Shafir, Land, Labor, 214–15.

21 Shapira, Anita, ha-Maʾavak ha-Nekhzav, 1929–1939 (The Futile Struggle: The Jewish Labor Controversy, 1929–1939) (Tel Aviv: ha-Kibbutz ha-Meyuhad, 1977), 26Google Scholar.

22 “Tokhnit Brith Shalom le-Cooperatsia beyn Yehudim ve-ʿAravim” (Brith Shalom's Plan for Cooperation Among Jews and Arabs), Sheifotenu (Our Aspirations) 4 (Jerusalem: Brith Shalom Press, 1930), 30–32.

23 Hattis, Bi-National Idea, 51–55.

24 Memorandum by the “Brith Shalom” Society on an Arab Policy for the Jewish Agency (Jerusalem: Azriel, 1930), 4–5.

25 Memorandum by the “Brith Shalom” Society, 3; Hattis, Bi-National Idea, 52.

26 Hattis, Bi-National Idea, 52; see also “Tokhnit Brith Shalom.”

27 Memorandum by the “Brith Shalom” Society, 10.

28 “Tokhnit Brith Shalom,” 32.

29 Hattis, Bi-National Idea, 53.

30 Ibid., 41, 216.

31 Ibid., 222.

32 Ibid., 226.

33 Ibid., 232–34.

34 Ibid., 257.

35 Ibid., 58.

36 Nachum Nir (Rafalkes), “ha-Efshari ha-Heskem ha-Yehudi–ʿAravi?” (Is the Jewish–Arab Accord Possible?) in Darkenu (Our Way): A Collection on Zionist Political Problems and Jewish–Arab Cooperation (August 1939), 29.

37 Ibid., 30.

38 Ibid., 31.

39 Ibid.

40 Gurion, David Ben, My Talks with Arab Leaders (New York: Third Press, 1973), 106–12Google Scholar; Cohen, Aharon, Israel and the Arab World (New York: Funk & Wagnalls, 1970), 226–76Google Scholar; Flapan, Simcha, Zionism and the Palestinians (London: Croom Helm, 1997), 227–29Google Scholar.

41 Shaltiel, Eli, Pinhas Rutenberg: Aliyato ve-Nefilato shel “Ish Hazak” be-Eretz Yisrael, 1879–1942 (Pinhas Rutenberg: The Rise and Fall of a “Strong Man” in Palestine, 1879–1942), vol. 2 (Tel Aviv: Am Oved, 1990)Google Scholar.

42 Goren, Arthur A., ed., Dissenter in Zion: From the Writings of Judah L. Magnes (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 As can be seen from Frumkin's earlier document, “Platform for Negotiations on Agreement in the Economy, Prepared in 1933,” A199/26, Central Zionist Archive (hereafter CZA).

44 Shapira, ha-Maʾavak.

45 Michal Frenkel, “Industrialization Ideologies in Palestine between Industrialization and Nationalism: The Case of Palestine Potash Limited” (master's thesis, Tel Aviv University, 1992), 45.

46 Ibid., 56–58.

47 Ibid., 66.

48 Furlonge, Geoffrey, Palestine Is My Country: The Story of Musa Alami (London: John Murray, 1969), 104Google Scholar.

49 P3/2448, Central Archive for the History of the Jewish People (hereafter CAHJP) ZA; Cohen, Israel and the Arab World, 267–69.

50 A199/26 Central Zionist Archive (CZA); Cohen, Israel and the Arab world, 267–69.

51 For chronology, see P3/2448, CAHJP.

52 Ibid., 2.

53 “Concord” and “Memorandum,” P3/2448, CAHJP.

54 S25/3434 and A199/26, CZA; and attached to “Memorandum,” P3/2448, CAHJP; Frumkin, Gad, Derekh Shofet be-Yerushalayim (A Judge's Path in Jerusalem) (Tel Aviv: Dvir, 1954), 333–35Google Scholar; Smilansky, Moshe, Tkumah ve-Shoah (Resurrection and Holocaust) (Tel Aviv: Massada, 1953), 191Google Scholar; Ben-Gurion, My Talks, 107–108.

55 A199/26, CZA; Cohen, Israel and the Arab World, 267–69; Smilansky, Tkumah ve-Shoah, 188–90. Flapan mistakenly presents Rutenberg's plan as the Five's own in Zionism, 227–28.

56 A199/26, CZA.

57 S25/3434, CZA.

58 A199/26, CZA.

59 “Concord” and “Memorandum,” P3/2448, CAHJP.

60 Mapai Central Committee (hereafter CC) minutes, 9 June 1936, 18, A245/168, CZA.

61 Mapai CC minutes, 23 June 1936, 5, A245/168, CZA.

62 Mapai CC minutes, 6 June 1936, 17, A245/168, CZA.

63 Mapai CC minutes, 4 June 1936, 19, A245/168, CZA

64 Mapai CC minutes, 6 June 1936, 12, A245/168, CZA.

65 Mapai CC minutes, 9 June 1936, 14, A245/168, CZA.

66 Mapai CC minutes, 3 June 1936, 6, 12–13, A245/168, CZA.

67 Mapai CC minutes, 29 June 1936, 26, A245/168, CZA.

68 Mapai CC minutes, 3 June 1936, 14–15, A245/168, CZA.

69 Mapai CC Minutes, 3 June 1936, 9, 7, and 9 June 1936, 17, A245/168, CZA.

70 Sheffer, Gabriel, Moshe Sharett: Biography of a Political Moderate (Oxford: Clarendon, 1996), 60, 78CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sharett, Moshe, Yoman Medini: 1936 (Political Diary: 1936) (Tel Aviv: Am Oved, 1968), 6Google Scholar.

71 Sheffer, Moshe Sharett, 79–80, 85.

72 Ibid., 79.

73 Haim, Yehoyada, Abandonment of Illusions: Zionist Political Attitudes toward Palestinian Arab Nationalism, 1936–1939 (Boulder, Colo.: Westview, 1983), 18Google Scholar.

74 S100/19b, CZA.

75 Jewish Agency Executive (hereafter JAE) minutes, 2 June 1936, 3, S100/19b, CZA.

76 JAE minutes, 2 June 1936, 9, S100/19b, CZA.

77 See ibid. and “Memorandum.”

78 Memorandum of conversation between Sharett and ʿAlami (24 June 1936); and letter from M. Shertok to Musa ʿAlami (July 8, 1938), S25/3434, CZA.

79 Memorandum of conversation between Sharett, Joseph, and ʿAlami (19 August 1936), S25/2960a, CZA; Sharett, Yoman Medini, 146–47, 176–79.

80 “Memorandum.”

81 Hattis, Bi-National Idea, 294.

82 Adam, Heribert and Moodley, Kogila, The Opening of the Apartheid Mind: Options for the New South Africa (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1993)Google Scholar; Neville, Alexander, “Approaches to the National Question in South Africa,” Transformation 1 (1983): 6395Google Scholar.

83 Gelber, Yoav, “Hitgabshut ha-Yishuv ha-Yehudi be-Eretz Yisrael, 1936–1947” (The Consolidation of the Jewish Community in Eretz-Israel, 1936–1947), in Toldot ha-Yishuv ha-Yehudi be-Eretz-Yisrael meʾaz ha-ʿAliyah ha-Rishonah, Helek Sheni: Tkufat ha-Mandat ha-Briti (The History of the Jewish Community in Eretz-Israel Since 1882, Part Two: The Period of the British Mandate), ed. Lissak, Moshe et al. (Jerusalem: Israel Academy for Sciences and Humanities, 1994), 377–80Google Scholar.

84 Ibid., 374–76.

85 Hattis, Bi-National Idea, 292.

86 Mapai CC minutes, 9 June 1936, 14, A245/168, CZA.

87 JAE minutes, 2 June 1936, 3–4, S100/19b, CZA.

88 Mapai CC minutes, 22 June 1936, 5, A245/168, CZA.

89 Ibid., 57.

3
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

CAPITALIST BINATIONALISM IN MANDATORY PALESTINE
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

CAPITALIST BINATIONALISM IN MANDATORY PALESTINE
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

CAPITALIST BINATIONALISM IN MANDATORY PALESTINE
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *