Skip to main content Accessibility help


  • Roland Petcu (a1), Chris Kimble (a2), Roxana Ologeanu-Taddei (a1), Isabelle Bourdon (a1) and Nicolas Giraudeau (a1)...


Objectives: The evaluation of telemedicine from the patient's point of view has focused on the patient pathway and patient satisfaction. However, research in this field does not provide us with the means to assess a patient's perception of the procedure if their reasoning ability is impaired. In this study, we use direct observation of a patient's behavior and mood to assess their perception of an oral teleconsultation procedure.

Methods: This study has been conducted in the context of a pilot project using an asynchronous teleconsultation to improve access to dental care for the dependent elderly, disabled people, and prisoners, some of whom may be cognitively impaired. We use a direct observation form consisting of five behavioral variables and eight affect variables to reflect the patient's experience of the oral teleconsultation procedure.

Results: A total of 135 patients were evaluated; 10 refused the procedure. Psychotic patients (n = 33) had a somewhat negative experience during the oral teleconsultation procedure. Patients who were not psychotic had a positive experience; this decreased as we moved from the autonomous to the semi-autonomous and then to the dependent sub-group. Some gender differences were also noted.

Conclusions: Improving evidence on evaluating the acceptance of the cognitively impaired is required to improve the technology development process so that it can be translated into an improved patient experience and adherence. Although the study was specifically focused on teledentistry, the approach described in this study could be adapted to other forms of teleconsultation.



Hide All
1. Mathers, CD, Loncar, D. Updated projections of global mortality and burden of disease, 2002-2030: Data sources, methods and results. Geneva: World Health Organization. [Online] 2005. (accessed March 12, 2015).
2. WHO. WHO | Facts about ageing. [Online]. Geneva: WHO. (accessed January 11, 2015).
3. Kimble, C. Business models for e-health: Evidence from ten case studies. Global Business and Organizational Excellence. 2015;34:18-30.
4. Sanchez Dils, E, Lefebvre, C, Abeyta, K. Teledentistry in the United States: A new horizon of dental care. Int J Dent Hyg. 2004;2: 161-164.
5. Zenthoefer, A, Cabrera, T, Hassel, A, Rammelsberg, P. Increasing dependency of older people in nursing homes is associated with need for dental treatments. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014;10:2285-2290.
6. Giraudeau, N, Valcarcel, J, Tassery, H, et al. Projet e-DENT: téléconsultation bucco-dentaire en EHPAD. Eur Res Telemed. 2014;3:51-56.
7. Broens, TH, Huis in't Veld, RM, Vollenbroek-Hutten, MM, Hermens, HJ, van Halteren, AT, Nieuwenhuis, LJ. Determinants of successful telemedicine implementations: A literature study. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13:303-309.
8. Delamater, AM. Improving patient adherence. Clin Diabetes. 2006;24:71-77.
9. Osterberg, L, Blaschke, T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:487-497.
10. Chen, K, Chan, AHS. A review of technology acceptance by older adults. Gerontechnology. 2011;10:1-12.
11. Inouye, SK, Foreman, MD, Mion, LC, Katz, KH, Cooney, LM. Nurses’ recognition of delirium and its symptoms: Comparison of nurse and researcher ratings. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:2467-2473.
12. Gerritsen, DL, Steverink, N, Ooms, ME, de Vet, HC, Ribbe, MW. Measurement of overall quality of life in nursing homes through self-report: The role of cognitive impairment. Qual Life Res. 2007;16:1029-1037.
13. Aubin, M, Verreault, R, Savoie, M, et al. Validité et utilité clinique d'une grille d'observation (PACSLAC-F) pour évaluer la douleur chez des aînés atteints de démence vivant en milieu de soins de longue durée. Can J Aging. 2008;27:45-55.
14. Aubin, M, Giguère, A, Hadjistavropoulos, T, Verreault, R. L’évaluation systématique des instruments pour mesurer la douleur chez les personnes âgées ayant des capacités réduites à communiquer. Pain Res Manag. 2007;12:195-203.
15. Watson, D, Clark, LA. Measurement and mismeasurement of mood: Recurrent and emergent issues. J Pers Assess. 1997;68:267-296.
16. Morello, R, Jean, A, Alix, M, Sellin-Peres, D, Fermanian, J. A scale to measure pain in non-verbally communicating older patients: The EPCA-2: Study of its psychometric properties. Pain. 2007;133:87-98.
17. Watson, D, Clark, LA, Tellegen, A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54:1063-1070.
18. Watson, D, Clark, LA. The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. Iowa City, Iowa: University of Iowa; 1999.
19. Venkatesh, V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating perceived behavioral control, computer anxiety and enjoyment into the technology acceptance model. Inf Syst Res. 2000;11:342-365.
20. Guo, X, Sun, Y, Wang, N, Peng, Z, Yan, Z. The dark side of elderly acceptance of preventive mobile health services in China. Electron Mark. 2013;23:49-61.
21. Stefan, Bracha, Vega, E, Vega, C. Posttraumatic dental-care anxiety: Is ‘dental phobia’ a misnomer? Hawaii Dent J. 206;37:17-19.
22. De Jong, A, Baartmans, M, Bremer, M, et al. Reliability, validity and clinical utility of three types of pain behavioural observation scales for young children with burns aged 0–5 years. Pain. 2010;150:561-567.
23. Manne, SL, Jacobsen, PB, Redd, WH. Assessment of acute pediatric pain: Do child self-report, parent and nurse ratings measure the same phenomenon? Pain. 1992;48:45-52.
24. Ely, EW, Inouye, SK, Gordon, S, et al. Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: Validity and reliability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-IC). JAMA. 2001;286: 2703-2710.
25. Burrows, AB, Morris, JN, Simon, SE, Hirdes, JP, Phillips, C. Development of a minimum data set-based depression rating scale for use in nursing homes. Age Ageing. 2000;29:165-172.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Petcu supplementary material
Supplementary Figure

 Word (1.9 MB)
1.9 MB


  • Roland Petcu (a1), Chris Kimble (a2), Roxana Ologeanu-Taddei (a1), Isabelle Bourdon (a1) and Nicolas Giraudeau (a1)...


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.