1.Cohen D, Billingsley M. Europeans are left to their own devices. BMJ. 2011;342:d2748.
2.Curfman GD, Redberg RF. Medical devices–balancing regulation and innovation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:975–977.
3.Sedrakyan A, Marinac-Dabic D, Normand SL, Mushlin A, Gross T. A framework for evidence evaluation and methodological issues in implantable device studies. Med Care. 2010;48 (Suppl):S121–S128.
4.Sutton AJ, Abrams KR. Bayesian methods in meta-analysis and evidence synthesis. Stat Methods Med Res. 2001;10:277–303.
5.Pibouleau L, Chevret S. Bayesian statistical method was underused despite its advantages in the assessment of implantable medical devices. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;64:270–279.
6.McCarron CE, Pullenayegum EM, Thabane L, Goeree R, Tarride JE. The importance of adjusting for potential confounders in Bayesian hierarchical models synthesising evidence from randomised and non-randomised studies: An application comparing treatments for abdominal aortic aneurysms. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:64.
7.Prevost TC, Abrams KR, Jones DR. Hierarchical models in generalized synthesis of evidence: An example based on studies of breast cancer screening. Stat Med. 2000;19:3359–3376.
8.Benitez RP, Silva MT, Klem J, Veznedaroglu E, Rosenwasser RH. Endovascular occlusion of wide-necked aneurysms with a new intracranial microstent (Neuroform) and detachable coils. Neurosurgery. 2004;54:1359–1367.
9.Biondi A, Janardhan V, Katz JM, et al.Neuroform stent-assisted coil embolization of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: Strategies in stent deployment and midterm follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2007;61:460–468; discussion 468–469.
10.Dos Santos Souza MP, Agid R, Willinsky RA, et al.Microstent-assisted coiling for wide-necked aneurysms. Can J Neurol Sci. 2005;32:71–81.
11.Gordhan A, Invergo D. Stent-assisted aneurysm coil embolization: Safety and efficacy at a low-volume center. Neurol Res. 2011;33:942–946.
12.Jabbour P, Koebbe C, Veznedaroglu E, Benitez RP, Rosenwasser R. Stent-assisted coil placement for unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;17:E10.
13.Kadkhodayan Y, Somogyi CT, Cross DT III, et al.Technical, angiographic and clinical outcomes of Neuroform 1, 2, 2 Treo and 3 devices in stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2012;4:368–374.
14.Katsaridis V, Papagiannaki C, Violaris C. Embolization of acutely ruptured and unruptured wide-necked cerebral aneurysms using the neuroform2 stent without pretreatment with antiplatelets: A single center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:1123–1128.
15.Lee YJ, Kim DJ, Suh SH, et al.Stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial wide-necked aneurysms. Neuroradiology. 2005;47:680–689.
16.Liang G, Gao X, Li Z, Wei X, Xue H. Neuroform stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: A 5 year single-center experience and follow-up. Neurol Res. 2010;32:721–727.
17.Sani S, Jobe KW, Lopes DK. Treatment of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms with the Neuroform2 Treo stent. A prospective 6-month study. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;18:E4.
18.Wajnberg E, de Souza JM, Marchiori E, Gasparetto EL. Single-center experience with the Neuroform stent for endovascular treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. Surg Neurol. 2009;72:612–619.
19.Wanke I, Doerfler A, Goericke S, et al.Treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms with a self-expanding stent: Mid-term results. Zentralbl Neurochir. 2005;66:163–169.
20.Agresti A, Coull BA. Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am Stat. 1998;52:119–126.
21.Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21:1539–1558.
22.Smith TC, Spiegelhalter DJ, Thomas A. Bayesian approaches to random-effects meta-analysis: A comparative study. Stat Med. 1995;14:2685–2699.
23.Spiegelhalter DJ, Abrams KR, Myles JP. Bayesian approaches to clinical trials and health-care evaluation. New York: Wiley; 2004.
24.Youn JH, Lord J, Hemming K, et al.Bayesian meta-analysis on medical devices: Application to implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28:115–124.
25.Spiegelhalter D, Best N, Carlin BP, Van der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Statist Soc B. 2002;64:583–639.