Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Randomized trial of a brief physiotherapy intervention compared with usual physiotherapy for neck pain patients: Cost-effectiveness analysis

  • Andrea Manca (a1), David M. Epstein (a1), David J. Torgerson (a1), Jennifer A. Klaber Moffett (a2), Simon Coulton (a1), Amanda J. Farrin (a3), Seokyung Hahn (a4), David A. Jackson (a2) and Stewart J. Richmond (a2)...

Objectives: To assess the cost-effectiveness of brief physiotherapy intervention versus usual physiotherapy management in patients with neck pain of musculoskeletal origin in the community setting.

Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted alongside a multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled clinical trial. Individuals 18 years of age and older with neck pain of more than 2 weeks were recruited from physiotherapy departments with referrals from general practitioners (GPs) in the East Yorkshire and North Lincolnshire regions in the United Kingdom. A total of 139 patients were allocated to the brief intervention, and 129 to the usual physiotherapy. Resource use data were prospectively collected on the number of physiotherapy sessions, hospital stay, specialist, and GP visits. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were estimated using EQ-5D data collected at baseline, 3 and 12 months from the start of the treatment. The economic evaluation was conducted from the U.K. National Health System perspective.

Results: On average, brief intervention produced lower costs (£−68; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], £−103 to £−35) and marginally lower QALYs (−0.001; 95 percent CI, −0.030 to 0.028) compared with usual physiotherapy, resulting in an incremental cost per QALY of £68,000 for usual physiotherapy. These results are sensitive to patients' treatment preferences.

Conclusions: Usual physiotherapy may not be good value for money for the average individual in this trial but could be a cost-effective strategy for those who are indifferent toward which treatment they receive.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

BarberJA, ThompsonSG. 2000Analysis of cost data in randomised trials: An application of the non-parametric bootstrap. Stat Med.19: 32193236.

DolanP. 1997Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 35: 10951108.

EfronB, TibshiraniR. 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall;

FenwickE, ClaxtonK, SculpherMJ. 2001Representing uncertainty: The role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Health Econ. 10: 779789.

HochJS, BriggsAH, WillanA. 2002Something old, something new, something borrowed, something BLUE: A framework for the marriage of health econometrics and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Econ. 11: 415430.

Klaber MoffettJA, JacksonDA, RichmondS, et al. 2005Randomised trial of a brief physiotherapy intervention compared with usual physiotherapy for neck pain patients: Outcomes and patient preference. Br Med J. 330: 7580.

Klaber MoffettJA, TorgersonDJ, Bell-SyerSB, et al. 1999Randomised controlled trial of exercise for low back pain: Clinical outcomes, costs, and preferences. Br Med J. 319: 279283.

LinDY, FeuerEJ, EtzioniR. 1997Estimating medical costs from incomplete follow-up data. Biometrics. 53: 419434.

LydickE, EpsteinRS, HimmelbergerD, WhiteCJ. 1995Area under the curve: A metric for patient subjective responses in episodic diseases. Qual Life Res. 4: 4145.

MancaA, HawkinsN, SculpherMJ. 2005Estimating mean QALYs in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: The importance of controlling for baseline utility. Health Econ. 14: 487496.

MatthewsJNS, AltmanD, CampbellM. 1990Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. Br Med J. 300: 230235.

PocockSJ, AssmannSE, EnosLE, KastenLE. 2002Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: Current practice and problems. Stat Med. 21: 29172930.

RafteryJ. 2001NICE: Faster access to modern treatments? Analysis of guidance on health technologies. Br Med J. 323: 13001303.

SkargrenEI, CarlssonPG, ObergBE. 1998One-year follow-up comparison of the cost and effectiveness of chiropractic and physiotherapy as primary management for back pain:subgroup analysis, recurrence, and additional health care utilization. Spine. 23: 18751883.

TorgersonDJ, SibbaldB.1998; Understanding controlled trials: What is a patient preference trial? Br Med J. 316: 360.

TorgersonDJ, RafteryJ. 1999Economic Note: Outcomes. Br Med J. 318: 1413.

Van HoutBA, AlMJ, GordonGS. 1994Costs, effects and c/e-ratios alongside a clinical trial. Health Econ. 3: 309319.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 20 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 141 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.