Skip to main content Accessibility help


  • Bjørn Hofmann (a1), Irina Cleemput (a2), Kenneth Bond (a3), Tanja Krones (a4), Sigrid Droste (a5), Dario Sacchini (a6) and Wija Oortwijn (a7)...

Background: Although value issues are increasingly addressed in health technology assessment (HTA) reports, HTA is still seen as a scientific endeavor and sometimes contrasted with value judgments, which are considered arbitrary and unscientific. This article aims at illustrating how numerous value judgments are at play in the HTA process, and why it is important to acknowledge and address value judgments.

Methods: A panel of experts involved in HTA, including ethicists, scrutinized the HTA process with regard to implicit value judgments. It was analyzed whether these value judgments undermine the accountability of HTA results. The final results were obtained after several rounds of deliberation.

Results: Value judgments are identified before the assessment when identifying and selecting health technologies to assess, and as part of assessment. They are at play in the processes of deciding on how to select, frame, present, summarize or synthesize information in systematic reviews. Also, in economic analysis, value judgments are ubiquitous. Addressing the ethical, legal, and social issues of a given health technology involves moral, legal, and social value judgments by definition. So do the appraisal and the decision-making process.

Conclusions: HTA by and large is a process of value judgments. However, the preponderance of value judgments does not render HTA biased or flawed. On the contrary they are basic elements of the HTA process. Acknowledging and explicitly addressing value judgments may improve the accountability of HTA.

Hide All
1. Arellano, LE, Willett, JM, Borry, P. International survey on attitudes toward ethics in health technology assessment: An exploratory study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:5054.
2. Wallay, T. Health technology assessment in England: Assessment and appraisal. Med J Aust. 2007;187:283285.
3. Putnam, H. The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2002.
4. Hennen, L. Biomedical and bioethical issues in parliamentary TA and in health technology assessment. Poiesis Prax. 2004;2:207220.
5. Flyvbjerg, B. Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: University of Cambridge; 2001.
6. Meggle, G, Nida-Rümelin, J (Eds.). [Actions, norms, values: Discussions with Georg Henrik von Wright]. Berlin: de Gruyter; 1999.
7. Molewijk, B, Stiggelbout, AM, Otten, W, Dupuis, HM, Kievit, J. Implicit normativity in evidence-based medicine: A plea for integrated empirical ethics research. Health Care Anal. 2003;11:6992.
8. Hofmann, B. Toward a procedure for integrating moral issues in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:312318.
9. Hofmann, B. On value-judgements and ethics in health technology assessment. Poiesis Prax. 2005;3:277295.
10. Nord, E. Cost-value analysis in health care: Making sense out of QALYs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
11. Cookson, R, Drummond, M, Weatherly, H. Explicit incorporation of equity considerations into economic evaluation of public health interventions. Health Econ Policy Law. 2009;4 (pt 2):231245.
12. Johri, M, Norheim, OF. Can cost-effectiveness analysis integrate concerns for equity? Systematic review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28:125132.
13. Culyer, AJ. Perspective and desire in comparative effectiveness research: The relative unimportance of mere preferences, the central importance of context. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28:889897.
14. Schwappach, DL. Resource allocation, social values and the QALY: A review of the debate and empirical evidence. Health Expect. 2002;5:210222.
15. Burls, A, Caron, L, de Langavant, GC, et al. Tackling ethical issues in health technology assessment: A proposed framework. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:230237.
16. Droste, S, Rixen, S. [Information on legal issues in health technologies: Methodological proposal to identify them in a systematic and comprehensible manner]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106:509522.
17. Hofmann, B. Why ethics should be part of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008;24:423429.
18. European Network for Health Technology Assessment EUnetHTA, The HTA Core Model*: Version 2.0. Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL); 2013. (accessed February 11, 2015).
19. Velasco Garrido, M, Borlum Kristensen, F, Palmhoj Nielsen, C, Busse, R. Health technology assessment and health policy-making in Europe. Geneva: World Health Organization on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2008.
20. Green, C. Considering the value associated with innovation in health technology appraisal decisions (deliberations): A NICE thing to do? Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2010;8:15.
21. Oortwijn, WJ, van der Wilt, GJ. [Distributive justice and health technology assessment in the Netherlands: Analysis of six projects funded within the Fund for Investigative Medicine]. Nijmegen: Universitair Medisch Centrum St Radboud, Afdeling MTA; 2003.
22. Tunis, SR. Reflections on science, judgment, and value in evidence-based decision making: A conversation with David Eddy. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26:w500w515.
23. Hoedemaekers, R, Oortwijn, W. Problematic notions in Dutch health care package decisions. Health Care Anal. 2003;11:287294.
24. Klein, R, Day, P, Redmayne, S. Managing scarcity: Priority setting and rationing in the National Health Service. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1996.
25. Bombard, Y, Abelson, J, Simeonov, D, Gauvin, FP. Eliciting ethical and social values in health technology assessment: A participatory approach. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:135144.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed