Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 16
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    De Pourcq, Kaat Gemmel, Paul and Trybou, Jeroen 2016. Boundaryless Hospital.


    MacLeod, Stuart and Mitton, Craig 2010. We Know Accurately Only When We Know Little. PharmacoEconomics, Vol. 28, Issue. 2, p. 105.


    2012. Functional Outcomes for 2 Years Comparing Hip Resurfacing and Total Hip Arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 27, Issue. 5, p. 750.


    Albers Mohrman, Susan (Rami) Shani, Abraham B. and McCracken, Arienne 2012. Organizing for Sustainable Health Care.


    Heintzbergen, Sanne Kulin, Nathalie A. IJzerman, Maarten J. Steuten, Lotte M.G. Werle, Jason Khong, Hoa and Marshall, Deborah A. 2013. Cost-Utility of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Compared to Conventional Total Hip Replacement in Young Active Patients with Osteoarthritis. Value in Health, Vol. 16, Issue. 6, p. 942.


    Mohrman, Susan Albers and (Rami) Shani, Abraham B. 2014. Reconfiguring the Ecosystem for Sustainable Healthcare.


    Amaricai, Elena Nemes, D. and Suciu, Oana 2011. 2011 6th IEEE International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI). p. 391.

    Webster, Fiona Perruccio, Anthony V Jenkinson, Richard Jaglal, Susan Schemitsch, Emil Waddell, James P Bremner, Samantha Mobilio, Melanie Hammond Venkataramanan, Viji and Davis, Aileen M 2013. Where is the patient in models of patient-centred care: a grounded theory study of total joint replacement patients. BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 13, Issue. 1,


    Smith, Holly N. Bhandari, Mohit Mahomed, Nizar N. Jan, Meryam and Gandhi, Rajiv 2012. Comparison of Arthroplasty Trial Publications After Registration in ClinicalTrials.gov. The Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 27, Issue. 7, p. 1283.


    Marshall, Deborah A. Wasylak, Tracy Khong, Hoa Parker, Robyn D. Faris, Peter D. and Frank, Cy 2012. Measuring the Value of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Considering Costs Over the Continuum of Care. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, Vol. 470, Issue. 4, p. 1065.


    Gooch, K. Marshall, D.A. Faris, P.D. Khong, H. Wasylak, T. Pearce, T. Johnston, D.W.C. Arnett, G. Hibbert, J. Beaupre, L.A. Zernicke, R.F. and Frank, C. 2012. Comparative effectiveness of alternative clinical pathways for primary hip and knee joint replacement patients: a pragmatic randomized, controlled trial. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, Vol. 20, Issue. 10, p. 1086.


    You, John J. Bederman, S. Samuel Symons, Sean Bell, Chaim M. Yun, Lingsong Laupacis, Andreas and Rampersaud, Y. Raja 2013. Patterns of Care After Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Spine in Primary Care. Spine, Vol. 38, Issue. 1, p. 51.


    Fyie, Ken Frank, Cy Noseworthy, Tom Christiansen, Tanya and Marshall, Deborah A. 2014. Evaluating the primary-to-specialist referral system for elective hip and knee arthroplasty. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 66.


    Ong, Kevin L. Lotke, Paul A. Lau, Edmund Manley, Michael T. and Kurtz, Steven M. 2015. Prevalence and Costs of Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy After Primary TJA. The Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 30, Issue. 7, p. 1121.


    Olson, Steven A. Obremskey, William T. and Bozic, Kevin J. 2013. Healthcare Technology: Physician Collaboration in Reducing the Surgical Cost. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, Vol. 471, Issue. 6, p. 1854.


    Barber, Claire E. Patel, Jatin N. Woodhouse, Linda Smith, Christopher Weiss, Stephen Homik, Joanne LeClercq, Sharon Mosher, Dianne Christiansen, Tanya Howden, Jane Squire Wasylak, Tracy Greenwood-Lee, James Emrick, Andrea Suter, Esther Kathol, Barb Khodyakov, Dmitry Grant, Sean Campbell-Scherer, Denise Phillips, Leah Hendricks, Jennifer and Marshall, Deborah A. 2015. Development of key performance indicators to evaluate centralized intake for patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Research & Therapy, Vol. 17, Issue. 1,


    ×
  • International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Volume 25, Issue 2
  • April 2009, pp. 113-123

The Alberta hip and knee replacement project: A model for health technology assessment based on comparative effectiveness of clinical pathways

Abstract

Background: The Alberta Hip and Knee Replacement Project developed a new evidence-based clinical pathway (NCP) for total hip (THR) and knee (TKR) replacement. The aim was to facilitate the delivery of services in a timely and cost-effective manner while achieving the highest quality of care for the patient across the full continuum of care from patient referral to an orthopedic surgeon through surgery, recovery, and rehabilitation. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the study design, rationale, and execution of this project as a model for health technology assessment based on comparative effectiveness of alternative clinical pathways.

Methods: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial study design was used to evaluate the NCP compared with the standard of care (SOC) for these procedures. The pragmatic study design was selected as a rigorous approach to produce high quality evidence suitable for informing decisions between relevant interventions in real clinical practice. The NCP was evaluated in three of the nine regional health authorities (RHAs) in Alberta with dedicated central intake clinics offering multidisciplinary care teams, constituting 80 percent of THR and TKR surgeries performed annually in Alberta. Patients were identified in the offices of twenty orthopedic surgeons who routinely performed THR or TKR surgeries. Evaluation outcome measures were based on the six dimensions of the Alberta Quality Matrix for Health (AQMH): acceptability, accessibility, appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency and safety. Data were collected prospectively through patient self-completed questionnaires at baseline and 3 and 12 months after surgery, ambulatory and inpatient chart reviews, and electronic administrative data.

Results: The trial design was successful in establishing similar groups for rigorous evaluation. Of the 4,985 patients invited to participate, 69 percent of patients consented. A total of 3,434 patients were randomized: 1,712 to SOC and 1,722 to the NCP. The baseline characteristics of patients in the two study arms, including demographics, comorbidity as measured by CDS and exposure to pain medications, and health-related quality of life, as measured by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and Short Form-36, were similar.

Conclusions: The Alberta Hip and Knee Replacement Project demonstrates the feasibility and advantages of applying a pragmatic randomized controlled trial to ascertain comparative effectiveness. This is a model for health technology assessment that incorporates how clinical pathways can be effectively evaluated.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1.NK Aaronson , C Acquadro , J Alonso , International quality of life assessment (IQOLA) project. Qual Life Res. 1992;1:349351.

8.I Boutron , D Moher , DG Altman , KF Schulz , P Ravaud , CONSORT Group. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:295309.

9.DE Brunenberg MJ van Steyn , JC Sluimer , Joint recovery programme versus usual care: An economic evaluation of a clinical pathway for joint replacement surgery. Med Care. 2005;43:10181026.

11.DO Clark , M Von Korff , K Saunders , WM Baluch , GE Simon . A chronic disease score with empirically derived weights. Med Care. 1995;33:783795.

14.T Dixon , ME Shaw , PA Dieppe . Analysis of regional variation in hip and knee joint replacement rates in England using hospital episodes statistics. Public Health. 2006;120:8390.

16.SM Dy , P Garg , D Nyberg , Critical pathway effectiveness: Assessing the impact of patient, hospital care, and pathway characteristics using qualitative comparative analysis. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:499516.

18.E Ernst , PH Canter . Limitations of “pragmatic” trials. Postgrad Med J. 2005;81:203.

19.N Freemantle , L Blonde , B Bolinder , Real-world trials to answer real-world questions. Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23:747754.

20.LP Jr Garrison , PJ Neumann , P Erickson , D Marshall , CD Mullins . Using real-world data for coverage and payment decisions: The ISPOR real-world data task force report. Value Health. 2007;10:326–35.

21.RE Glasgow , DJ Magid , A Beck , D Ritzwoller , PA Estabrooks . Practical clinical trials for translating research to practice: Design and measurement recommendations. Med Care. 2005;43:551557.

23.WL Healy , ME Ayers , R Iorio , Impact of a clinical pathway and implant standardization on total hip arthroplasty: A clinical and economic study of short-term patient outcome. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:266276.

24.NB Jain , LD Higgins , D Ozumba , Trends in epidemiology of knee arthroplasty in the United States, 1990–2000. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:39283933.

27.EA Lingard , S Berven , JN Katz , Kinemax Outcomes Group. Management and care of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: Variations across different health care settings. Arthritis Care Res. 2000;13:129136.

28.A Macario , M Horne , S Goodman , The effect of a perioperative clinical pathway for knee replacement surgery on hospital costs. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:978984.

29.SJ Macdonald , KD Charron , RB Bourne , The John Insall Award: Gender-specific total knee replacement: Prospectively collected clinical outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:26122616.

30.H Macpherson . Pragmatic clinical trials. Complement Ther Med. 2004;12:136140.

31.AD McMahon . Study control, violators, inclusion criteria and defining explanatory and pragmatic trials. Stat Med. 2002;21:13651376.

33.M Panella , S Marchisio , F Di Stanislao . Reducing clinical variations with clinical pathways: Do pathways work? Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15:509521.

34.SD Pearson , SF Kleefield , JR Soukop , EF Cook , TH Lee . Critical pathways intervention to reduce length of hospital stay. Am J Med. 2001;110:175180.

36.M Renholm , H Leino-Kilpi , T Suominen . Critical pathways. A systematic review. J Nurs Adm. 2002;32:196202.

37.P Rissanen , S Aro , H Sintonen , P Slatis , P Paavolainen . Quality of life and functional ability in hip and knee replacements: A prospective study. Qual Life Res. 1996;5:5664.

38.M Roland , DJ Torgerson . What are pragmatic trials? BMJ. 1998;316:285.

39.Roos EM. Effectiveness and practice variation of rehabilitation after joint replacement. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2003;15:160162.

40.D Schwartz , J Lellouch . Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. J Chronic Dis. 1967;20:637648.

41.SM Teutsch , ML Berger , MC Weinstein . Comparative effectiveness: Asking the right questions, choosing the right method. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24:128132.

42.SR Tunis , DB Stryer , CM Clancy . Practical clinical trials: Increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA. 2003;290:16241632.

47.GR Wilensky . Developing a center for comparative effectiveness information. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25:w572w585.

48.M Zwarenstein , S Treweek , JJ Gagnier , Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: An extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ. 2008;337:a2390.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
  • ISSN: 0266-4623
  • EISSN: 1471-6348
  • URL: /core/journals/international-journal-of-technology-assessment-in-health-care
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Gooch supplementary materials
Supplementary lists

 Unknown (56 KB)
56 KB