Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T23:43:03.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bărbulescu v. Romania

European Court of Human Rights.  05 September 2017 .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access

Abstract

Human rights — Right to respect for private and family life — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 8 — Applicability — Whether communications in workplace covered by concepts of “private life” and “correspondence” — Compliance with Article 8 — Employment — Personal data — Data protection — Electronic communications — Whether case concerning State’s negative or positive obligations — Whether respondent State required to set up legislative framework to protect applicant’s right in context of professional relationship with private employer — Margin of appreciation — Whether domestic authorities adequately protecting applicant’s right — Whether striking fair balance between interests of individual and community as whole — Whether respondent State violating Article 8 of Convention

Damages — Non-pecuniary damage — Finding of violation of Article 8 of European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Whether applicant suffering non-pecuniary damage — Whether finding of violation constituting in itself sufficient just satisfaction — Article 41 of Convention

Type
Case Report
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)