Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T15:13:37.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Explaining the Transnational Design of International Organizations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2014

Get access

Abstract

Past decades have witnessed a shift in international cooperation toward growing involvement of transnational actors (TNAs), such as nongovernmental organizations, multinational corporations, and philanthropic foundations. This article offers a comprehensive theoretical and empirical account of TNA access to IOs. The analysis builds on a novel data set, covering formal TNA access to 298 organizational bodies from fifty IOs over the time period 1950 to 2010. We identify the most profound patterns in TNA access across time, issue areas, policy functions, and world regions, and statistically test competing explanations of the variation in TNA access. The central results are three-fold. First, the empirical data confirm the existence of a far-reaching institutional transformation of IOs over the past sixty years, pervading all issue areas, policy functions, and world regions. Second, variation in TNA access within and across IOs is mainly explained by a combination of three factors: functional demand for the resources of TNAs, domestic democratic standards in the membership of IOs, and state concerns with national sovereignty. Third, existing research suffers from a selection bias that has led it to overestimate the general importance of a new participatory norm in global governance for the openness of IOs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization 54 (3):421–56.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen. 2006. Private Litigants and the New International Courts. Comparative Political Studies 39 (1):2249.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen. 2014. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Andresen, Steinar, and Skodvin, Tora. 2003. Nonstate Influence in the International Whaling Commission, 1970–1990. Global Environmental Politics 3 (4):6186.Google Scholar
Archibugi, Daniele, Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias, and Marchetti, Raffaele, eds. 2011. Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asian Development Bank (ADB). 1987. The ADB's Cooperation with Non-governmental Organizations. Manila, Philippines: ADB.Google Scholar
Asian Development Bank (ADB). 1999. 1999 NGO Report. Manila, Philippines: ADB. Available at http://www.adb.org/documents/1999-ngo-report. Accessed 15 January 2011.Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, Karin. 2006. Democratizing Global Environmental Governance? Stakeholder Democracy After the World Summit on Sustainable Development. European Journal of International Relations 12 (4):467–98.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N., and Finnemore, Martha. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bearce, David H., and Bondanella, Stacy. 2007. Intergovernmental Organizations, Socialization, and Member-State Interest Convergence. International Organization 61 (4):703–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betsill, Michele M., and Corell, Elisabeth, eds. 2008. NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Beyeler, Michelle, and Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2005. Transnational Protest and the Public Sphere. Mobilization 10 (1):95109.Google Scholar
Biersteker, Thomas. 2012. State, Sovereignty, and Territory. In Handbook of International Relations, 2nd ed., edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth, 157–76. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Boli, John, and Thomas, George M., eds. 1999. Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bouwen, Pieter. 2002. Corporate Lobbying in the European Union: The Logic of Access. Journal of European Public Policy 9 (3):365–90.Google Scholar
Bradley, Curtis A., and Kelley, Judith G.. 2008. The Concept of International Delegation. Law and Contemporary Problems 71 (1):136.Google Scholar
Brett, Rachel. 1993. NGOs and the Human Dimension of the CSCE. CSCE ODIHR Bulletin 1 (Winter 1992/1993):38.Google Scholar
Brühl, Tanja, and Rosert, Elvira. 2009. Another Quiet Revolution? New Governance Forms and the Norm of Participation in the United Nations System. Paper presented at the 2nd Conference on the Political Economy of International Organizations, January, Geneva.Google Scholar
Chambers, Bradnee. 2005. From Environmental to Sustainable Governance: Thirty Years of Coordination Within the United Nations. In Reforming International Environmental Governance, edited by Chambers, Bradnee and Green, Jessica, 1339. New York: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve. 1997. Two Centuries of Participation: NGOs and International Governance. Michigan Journal of International Law 18:183286.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, Steve. 2000. Opening the WTO to Nongovernmental Interests. Fordham International Law Journal 24 1–2):173216.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2005. International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework. International Organization 59 (4):801–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Ann Marie, Friedman, Elisabeth, and Hochstetler, Kathryn. 1998. The Sovereign Limits of Global Civil Society: A Comparison of NGO Participation in UN World Conferences on the Environment, Human Rights, and Women. World Politics 51 (1):135.Google Scholar
Cline, Kirssa, Rhamey, Patrick, Henshaw, Alexis, Seziak, Alicia, Tandon, Aakriti, and Volgy, Thomas J.. 2011. Identifying Regional Powers and Their Status. In Major Powers and the Quest for Status in International Politics: Global and Regional Perspectives, edited by Volgy, Thomas J., Corbetta, Renato, Grant, Keith, and Baird, Ryan, 133–58. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Conca, Ken. 1996. Greening the UN: Environmental Organizations and the UN System. In NGOs, the UN, and Global Governance, edited by Weiss, Thomas G. and Gordenker, Leon, 103–19. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Corell, Elisabeth, and Betsill, Michele M.. 2008. Analytical Framework: Assessing the Influence of NGO Diplomats. In NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations, edited by Betsill, Michele M. and Corell, Elisabeth, 1942. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 1999. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Drori, Gili S., Yang, Suk Jong, and Meyer, John W.. 2006. Sources of Rationalized Governance: Cross-National Longitudinal Analyses, 1985–2002. Administrative Science Quarterly 51 (2):205–29.Google Scholar
Florini, Ann. 2006. International NGOs. In Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by Rhodes, R.A.W., Binder, Sarah A., and Rockman, Bert A., 673–90. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gartzke, Erik, and Jo, Dong-Joon. 2002. The Affinity of Nations Index, 1946–1996 Codebook. Version 4.0. Available at <http://pages.ucsd.edu/~egartzke/data/affinity_codebook_03102006.pdf>. Accessed 19 February 2014..+Accessed+19+February+2014.>Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Ward, Michael D.. 2008. Diffusion and the International Context of Democratization. International Organization 60 (4):911–33.Google Scholar
Gornitzka, Åse, and Sverdrup, Ulf. 2011. Access of Experts: Information and EU Decision-making. West European Politics 34 (1):4870.Google Scholar
Green, Jessica. 2010. Private Authority on the Rise: A Century of Delegation in Multilateral Environmental Agreements. In Transnational Actors in Global Governance: Patterns, Explanations, and Implications, edited by Jönsson, Christer, and Tallberg, Jonas, 155–76. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigorescu, Alexandru. 2007. Transparency of Intergovernmental Organizations: The Roles of Member States, International Bureaucracies and Nongovernmental Organizations. International Studies Quarterly 51 (3):625–48.Google Scholar
Grigorescu, Alexandru. 2010. The Spread of Bureaucratic Oversight Mechanisms across Intergovernmental Organizations. International Studies Quarterly 54 (3):871–86.Google Scholar
Hanegraaff, Marcel, Beyers, Jan, and Braun, Caelesta. 2011. Open the Door to More of the Same? The Development of Interest Group Representation at the WTO. World Trade Review 10 (4):447–72.Google Scholar
Hawdon, James E. 1997. Economic Development and Regional Integration in Economic Intergovernmental Organizations. In At the Crossroads of Development: Transnational Challenges to Developed and Developing Societies, edited by Behar, Joseph E., and Cuzán, Albert G., 136–48. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Darren. 2008. Protecting Democracy in Europe and the Americas. International Organization 62 (3):373403.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Darren, Lake, David A., Nielson, Daniel L., and Tierney, Michael J., eds. 2006. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heurlin, Christopher. 2010. Governing Civil Society: The Political Logic of NGO-State Relations Under Dictatorship. Voluntas 21 (2):220–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 1999. Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics. International Organization 53 (2):379408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jönsson, Christer, and Tallberg, Jonas, eds. 2010. Transnational Actors in Global Governance: Patterns, Explanations, and Implications. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 2005. Defining Accountability Up: The Global Economic Multilaterals. In Global Governance and Public Accountability, edited by Held, David, and Koenig-Achibugi, Mathias, 834. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Mary. 1999. New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G. 2004. Ethnic Politics in Europe. The Power of Norms and Incentives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith G. 2012. Monitoring Democracy. When International Election Observation Works, and Why It Often Fails. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Nye, Joseph S.. 2003. Redefining Accountability for Global Governance. In Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition, edited by Kahler, Miles and Lake, David A., 386411. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., Nye, Joseph S., and Hoffman, Stanley, eds. 1993. After the Cold War: International Institutions and State Strategies in Europe, 1989–1991. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kissling, Claudia, and Steffek, Jens. 2008. CSOs and the Democratization of International Governance: Prospects and Problems. In Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance, edited by Steffek, Jens, Kissling, Claudia, and Nanz, Patrizia, 208–18. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara. 2008. When, What, and Why Do States Choose to Delegate? Law and Contemporary Problems 71 (1):151–92.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara. 2013. The Continent of International Law. Journal of Conflict Resolution 57 (4):653–81.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan. 2001. The Rational Design of International Institutions. International Organization 55 (4):761–99.Google Scholar
Levine, Sol, and White, Paul E.. 1961. Exchange as a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Interorganizational Relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly 5 (4):583601.Google Scholar
Liese, Andrea. 2010. Explaining Varying Degrees of Openness in the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). In Transnational Actors in Global Governance: Patterns, Explanations, and Implications, edited by Jönsson, Christer and Tallberg, Jonas, 88109. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Terry. 2008. Global Stakeholder Democracy: Power and Representation Beyond Liberal States. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., Milner, Helen V., and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2000. Free to Trade: Democracies, Autocracies, and International Trade. American Political Science Review 94 (2):305–21.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Pevehouse, Jon. 2006. Democratization and International Organizations. International Organization 60 (1):137–67.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., and Rowan, Brian. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83 (2):340–63.Google Scholar
Michel, Jean-Baptiste, and Shen, Yuan Kui, Aiden, Aviva Presser, Veres, Adrian, Gray, Matthew K., The Google Books Team, Pickett, Joseph P., Hoiberg, Dale, Clancy, Dan, Norvig, Peter, Orwant, Jon, Pinker, Steven, Nowak, Martin A., and Aiden, Erez Lieberman. 2011. Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books. Science 331 (6014):176–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, Ronald B. 1998. Sources of Transparency: Information Systems in International Regimes. International Studies Quarterly 42 (1):109–30.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2005. Is There a “Democratic Deficit” in World Politics? A Framework for Analysis. In Global Governance and Public Accountability, edited by Held, David and Koenig-Achibugi, Mathias, 212–39. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Murdie, Amanda M., and Davis, David R.. 2012. Shaming and Blaming: Using Events Data to Assess the Impact of Human Rights NGOs. International Studies Quarterly 56 (1):116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, Robert, Goetz, Anne Marie, Scholte, Jan Aart, and Williams, Marc. 2000. Contesting Global Governance. Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Otto, Dianne. 1996. Nongovernmental Organizations in the United Nations System: The Emerging Role of International Civil Society. Human Rights Quarterly 18 (1):107–41.Google Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon. 2005. Democracy from Above: Regional Organizations and Democratization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon, Nordstrom, Timothy, and Warnke, Kevin. 2004. Intergovernmental Organizations, 1815–2000: A New Correlates of War Data Set. Conflict Management and Peace Science 21 (2):101–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Salancik, Gerald R.. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Walter W., and DiMaggio, Paul J., eds. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal. 1997. States, NGOs, and International Environmental Institutions. International Studies Quarterly 41 (4):719–40.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal. 2004. Police Patrols and Fire Alarms in the NAAEC. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 26 (3):389413.Google Scholar
Reimann, Kim D. 2006. A View from the Top: International Politics, Norms, and the Worldwide Growth of NGOs. International Studies Quarterly 50 (1):4568.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2012. Transnational Actors and World Politics. In Handbook of International Relations, 2nd ed., edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., 426–52. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sarkees, Meredith, and Wayman, Frank. 2010. Resort to War: 1816–2007. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Saurugger, Sabine. 2010. The Social Construction of the Participatory Turn: The Emergence of a Norm in the European Union. European Journal of Political Research 49 (4):471–95.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz. 1988. The Joint-Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration. Public Administration 66 (3):239–78.Google Scholar
Scholte, Jan Aart, ed. 2011. Building Global Democracy: Civil Society and Accountable Global Governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steffek, Jens. 2013. Explaining Cooperation Between IGOs and NGOs—Push Factors, Pull Factors, and the Policy Cycle. Review of International Studies 39 (4):9931013.Google Scholar
Steffek, Jens, and Ehling, Ulrike. 2008. Civil Society Participation at the Margins: The Case of the WTO. In Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance, edited by Steffek, Jens, Kissling, Claudia, and Nanz, Patrizia, 95115. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Steffek, Jens, Kissling, Claudia, and Nanz, Patrizia, eds. 2008. Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance: A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas. 2002. Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and the European Union. International Organization 56 (3):609–43.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas, and Jönsson, Christer. 2010. Transnational Actor Participation in International Institutions: Where, Why, and with What Consequences? In Transnational Actors in Global Governance: Patterns, Explanations, and Implications, edited by Jönsson, Christer and Tallberg, Jonas, 121. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas, Sommerer, Thomas, Squatrito, Theresa, and Jönsson, Christer. 2013. The Opening Up of International Organizations: Transnational Access in Global Governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Truman, David. 1951. The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
UN ECOSOC. 2011. Online Database on ECOSOC Consultative Status. New York: United Nations. Available at <http://esango.un.org/civilsociety>. Accessed 15 December 2011..+Accessed+15+December+2011.>Google Scholar
Union of International Associations. 2010. Yearbook of International Organizations. New York: K.G. Saur.Google Scholar
Voeten, Erik, and Merdzanovic, Adis. 2009. United Nations General Assembly Voting Data. Available at <http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/12379>. Accessed 15 February 2014..+Accessed+15+February+2014.>Google Scholar
Weiss, Thomas G., and Gordenker, Leon, eds. 1996. NGOs, the UN, and Global Governance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Willetts, Peter. 2000. From “Consultative Arrangements” to “Partnership”: The Changing Status of NGOs in Diplomacy at the UN. Global Governance 6 (2):191212.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael 2000. Democratic Governance Beyond the Nation-State: The EU and Other International Institutions. European Journal of International Relation 6 (2):183221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2012. The Politicization of World Politics and Its Effects: Eight Propositions. European Political Science Review 6 (1):4771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael, and Checkel, Jeffrey T.. 2005. Getting Socialized to Build Bridges: Constructivism, Rationalism and the Nation-State. International Organization 59 (4):1045–79.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael, Binder, Martin, and Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias. 2012. International Authority and Its Politicization. International Theory 4 (1):69106.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Tallberg Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Tallberg Supplementary Material(File)
File 180.7 KB