Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-jqctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-29T07:28:53.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Historical Institutionalism in International Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2011

Orfeo Fioretos
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia. E-mail: kof@temple.edu
Get access

Abstract

This article reviews recent contributions to International Relations (IR) that engage the substantive concerns of historical institutionalism and explicitly and implicitly employ that tradition's analytical features to address fundamental questions in the study of international affairs. It explores the promise of this tradition for new research agendas in the study of international political development, including the origin of state preferences, the nature of governance gaps, and the nature of change and continuity in the international system. The article concludes that the analytical and substantive profiles of historical institutionalism can further disciplinary maturation in IR, and it proposes that the field be more open to the tripartite division of institutional theories found in other subfields of Political Science.

Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abdelal, Rawi. 2007. Capital Rules: The Construction of Global Finance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Meunier, Sophie. 2009. Symposium: The Politics of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1):1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, W. Brian. 1984. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Finnemore, Martha. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Barton, John H., Goldstein, Judith L., Josling, Timothy E., and Steinberg, Richard H.. 2006. The Evolution of the Trade Regime: Politics, Law, and Economics of the GATT and the WTO. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bensel, Richard. 2003. The Tension Between American Political Development as a Research Community and as a Disciplinary Subfield. Studies in American Political Development 17 (1):103–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Sheri. 2006. The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe's Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, Mark. 2001. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourantonis, Dimitris. 2005. The History and Politics of UN Security Council Reform. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2002. Taking Temporality Seriously: Modeling History and the Use of Narratives as Evidence. American Political Science Review 96 (3):481–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callaghan, Helen, and Höpner, Martin. 2005. European Integration and the Clash of Capitalisms: Political Cleavages over Takeover Liberalization. Comparative European Politics 3 (3):3032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, John L. 2004. Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capoccia, Giovanni, and Kelemen, R. Daniel. 2007. The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics 59 (3):341–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., eds. 2002. Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2005. International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework. International Organization 59 (4):801–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortell, Andrew, and Peterson, Susan. 2004. Historical Institutionalism and IO Design: A Synthetic Approach to IO Independence. Paper presented at the Conference on Theoretical Synthesis and the Study of International Organization, February, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin, and Farrell, Henry. 2004. Breaking the Path of Institutional Development? Alternatives to the New Determinism in Political Economy. Rationality and Society 16 (1):543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, Paul A. 1985. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review 75 (2):332–37.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel. 2009. The Power and Peril of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1):6570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elman, Colin, and Elman, Miriam Fendius. 2001. Bridges and Boundaries: Historians, Political Scientists, and the Study of International Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G., and Lynch, Julia F.. 2009. Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Analysis. Comparative Political Studies 42 (9):1143–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Henry, and Newman, Abraham. 2010. Making International Markets: Domestic Institutions in International Political Economy. Review of International Political Economy 17 (4):609–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology's Institutionalism. International Organization 50 (2):325–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2001. Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 4:391416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fioretos, Orfeo. 2001. The Domestic Sources of Multilateral Preferences: Varieties of Capitalism in the European Community. In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, edited by Hall, Peter A. and Soskice, David, 216–46. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fioretos, Orfeo. 2009. The Regulation of Transnational Corporate Identity in Europe. Comparative Political Studies 42 (9):1167–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry A. 1999. Actors and Preferences in International Relations. In Strategic Choice and International Relations, edited by Lake, David A. and Powell, Robert, 3976. Princeton, N.Y.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry A. 2009. Global Imbalances, National Rebalancing, and the Political Economy of Recovery. CFR/IIGG Working Paper, October. New York: Council on Foreign Relations/Greenberg Center for Geoeconomic Studies.Google Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry A., and Martin, Lisa. 2001. International Political Economy: Global and Domestic Interactions. In Political Science: State of the Discipline, edited by Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen V., 118–46. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Garrett, Laurie. 2007. The Challenge of Global Health. Foreign Affairs 86 (1):1438.Google Scholar
Germain, Randall. 2009. Financial Order and World Politics: Crisis, Change and Continuity. International Affairs 85 (4):669–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 2001. Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Judith. 1993. Ideas, Interests and American Trade Policy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, Kahler, Miles, Keohane, Robert O., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2000. Introduction: Legalization and World Politics. International Organization 54 (3):115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Ryan, and Jinks, Derek. 2004. How to Influence States: Socialization and Internatioanl Human Rights Law. Duke Law Journal 54 (3):621703.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 1993. Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 25 (3):275–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Taylor, Rosemary C. R.. 1996. Political Science and the Three Institutionalisms. Political Studies 44 (5):936–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobden, Stephen, and Hobson, John M.. 2002. Historical Sociology in International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 1988. Conclusion: An Institutional Approach to American Foreign Economic Policy. International Organization 42 (1):219–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2009. Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order. Perspectives on Politics 70 (1):7187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immergut, Ellen. 1998. The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism. Politics & Society 26 (1):534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Labour Organization (ILO). 2004. World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization. A Fair Globalization: Creating Opportunities for All. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1997. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Alistair Iain. 2001. Treating International Institutions as Social Environments. International Studies Quarterly 45 (4):487515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jupille, Joseph, Caporaso, James, and Checkel, Jeffrey. 2003. Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 36 (1-2):740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, Miles, and Lake, David A.. 2003. Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles, and Lake, David A.. 2009. Economic Integration and Global Governance: Why So Little Supranationalism? In The Politics of Global Regulations, edited by Mattli, Walter and Woods, Ngaire, 242–76. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1978. Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O., and Krasner, Stephen D.. 1998. International Organization and the Study of World Politics. International Organization 52 (4):645–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katznelson, Ira, and Weingast, Barry R.. 2005. Intersections between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism. In Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism, edited by Katznelson, Ira and Weingast, Barry R., 126. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 2008. Big Questions in the Study of World Politics. In The Oxford Handbook of International relations, edited by Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan, 708–15. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Martin, Lisa L.. 2001. Institutional Theory as a Research Program. In Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field, edited by Elman, Colin and Elman, Miriam Fendius, 71108. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan. 2001. The Rational Design of Institutions. International Organization 55 (4):761–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David. 2002. Progress in International Relations: Beyond Paradigms in the Study of Institutions. In Realism and Institutionalism in International Studies, edited by Brecher, Michael and Harvey, Frank P., 135–52. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, George. 2006. The Promise of Historical Sociology in International Relations. International Studies Review 8 (3):397423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leon, Joshua. 2010. The Rise of Global Health: Consensus, Expansion, and Specialization. Ph.D. diss., Temple University, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Lindner, Johannes, and Rittberger, Berthold. 2003. The Creation, Interpretation and Contestation of Institutions: Revisiting Historical Institutionalism. Journal of Common Market Studies 41 (3):445–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James. 2000. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society 4 (4):507–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, Kimball, Erin, and Koivu, Kendra L.. 2009. The Logic of Historical Explanation in the Social Sciences. Comparative Political Studies 42 (1):114–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. 2003. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2009. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Snyder, Jack. 2005. Electing to Fight: Why Emerging Democracies Go to War. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1984. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review 78 (3):734–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lisa L., and Simmons, Beth A.. 1998. Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization 52 (4):729–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattli, Walter, and Büthe, Tim. 2003. Setting International Standards: Technological Rationality or Primacy of Power? World Politics 56 (1):142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Kathleen R. 1998. The Currency of Ideas: Monetary Politics in the European Union. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John. 1990. Back to the Future: Instability of Europe After the Cold War. International Security 15 (1):556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meunier, Sophie, and McNamara, Kathleen R.. 2007. Making History: European Integration and Institutional Change at Fifty. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V. 1998. Rationalizing Politics: The Emerging Synthesis of International, American and Comparative Politics. International Organization 52 (4):759–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization 51 (4):513–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, Abraham L. 2008. Protectors of Privacy: Regulating Personal Data in the Global Economy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2005. Policy Coherence for Development: Promoting Institutional Good Practice. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Orren, Karen, and Skowronek, Stephen. 2004. The Search for American Political Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Scott. 2006. Path Dependence. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1 (1):87115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philpott, Daniel. 2001. Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1993. When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics 45 (4):595628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 1996. The Path to European Integration: A Historical-Institutionalist Analysis. Comparative Political Studies 29 (2):123–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 94 (2):251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul, and Skocpol, Theda. 2001. Historical Institutionalism in Contemporary Political Science. In Political Science: State of the Discipline, edited by Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen V., 693721. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Pollack, Mark A. 2006. Rational Choice and EU Politics. Handbook of European Union Politics, edited by Jørgensen, Knud Erik, Pollack, Mark A., and Rosamond, Ben, 3156. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, Kal. 2009. Does the Constitution Follow the Flag? The Evolution of Territoriality in American Law. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, and Victor, David G.. 2004. The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources. International Organization 58 (2):277309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian, and Snidal, Duncan, eds. 2008. The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 2003. The United Nations and Globalization: Patterns and Limits of Institutional Adaptation. Global Governance 9 (3):301–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 2004. Reconstituting the Global Public Domain: Issues, Actors, and Practices. European Journal of International Relations 10 (4):499531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Elizabeth. 2006. Historical Institutionalism. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, Sarah A., and Rockman, Bert A., 3955. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory. 2006. The Challenges of WTO Law: Strategies for Developing Country Adaptation. World Trade Review 5 (2):177–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, Cheryl, Jacobson, Harold K., and Kaplan, Jeffrey H.. 1996. Inertia and Change in the Constellation of International Governmental Organizations, 1981–1992. International Organization 50 (4):593627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth. 2006. Rational Choice Institutionalism. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, Sarah, and Rockman, Bert A., 2338. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., and Martin, Lisa L.. 2002. International Organizations and Institutions. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., 192211. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, David Andrew. 2007. Regulating Capital: Setting Standards for the International Financial System. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 2002. Rational Choice and International Relations. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., 7394. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solingen, Etel. 2007. Nuclear Logics: Contrasting Paths in East Asia and the Middle East. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Arthur. 2008. Neoliberal Institutionalism. In Oxford Handbook of International Relations, edited by Reus-Smit, Christian and Snidal, Duncan, 201–21. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steinmo, Sven, Thelen, Kathleen, and Longstreth, Frank. 1992. Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2005. Introduction. In Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Capitalist Economies, edited by Streeck, Wolfgang and Thelen, Kathleen, 139. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2:369404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1990. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1992. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc. 2006. The Craft of International History: A Guide to Method. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2000. United Nations Millennium Declaration. U.N. General Assembly 18 September 2000. A/RES/55/2.Google Scholar
Victor, David. 2001. The Collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the Struggle to Slow Global Warming. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wallander, Celeste A. 2000. Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO After the Cold War. International Organization 54 (4):705–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, Catherine. 2008. Hypocrisy Trap: The World Bank and the Poverty of Reform. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, Ngaire, ed. 1996. Explaining International Relations Since 1945. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar