Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-kbvt8 Total loading time: 0.22 Render date: 2021-10-21T13:13:54.386Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Is Self-determination Contagious? A Spatial Analysis of the Spread of Self-Determination Claims

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2017

Get access

Abstract

Self-determination claims have abounded in the international system since the end of World War II. But these claims have not emerged everywhere. About half of the states in the international system face some challenge related to self-determination today. Why do some states face these demands while others do not? We argue that ethno-national self-determination is one of many identities with which individuals can find affinity. While an international norm related to self-determination has developed globally, its use as a basis for political claims has diffused regionally. Diffusion of self-determination occurs through observation of others using self-determination as a basis of organization, generating a sense of legitimacy, sensitivity to related grievance, and perceptions of tangible benefits related to self-determination identification. We test this empirically on global data on self-determination claims from 1960 to 2005 and find evidence of spatial diffusion, suggesting that self-determination is, to some extent, contagious.

Type
Research Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdelal, Rawi, Herrera, Yoshiko, Johnston, Alastair Iain, and McDermott, Rose. 2009. Measuring Identity: A Guide for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, Nina, André, Richard, Berger, Ryan, Escarfuller, Wilda, and Sabatini, Christopher. 2012. Political Representation and Social Inclusion: A Comparative Study of Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, and Guatemala. Americas Society. New York: Ford Foundation.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Spolaore, Enrico. 2005. The Size of Nations. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Amoretti, Ugo, and Bermeo, Nancy. 2004. Federalism, Unitarianism, and Territorial Cleavages. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bakke, Kristin M. 2013. Copying and Learning from Outsiders? In Transnational Dynamics of Civil War, edited by Checkel, Jeffrey T., 3163. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakke, Kristin M., and Wibbels, Eric. 2006. Diversity, Disparity, and Civil Conflict in Federal States. World Politics 59 (1):150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beissinger, Mark R. 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, Alex. 2010. Resisting Infection: How State Capacity Conditions Conflict Contagion. Journal of Peace Research 47 (3):311–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1996. Nationalism Refrained: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers, and Laitin, David. 1998. Ethnic and Nationalist Violence. Annual Review of Sociology 24:423–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhaug, Halvard, and Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. 2008. Contagion or Confusion? Why Conflicts Cluster in Space. International Studies Quarterly 52 (2): 215–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhaug, Halvard, Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Rød, Jan Ketil. 2008. Disaggregating Ethno-Nationalist Civil Wars: A Dyadic Test of Exclusion Theory. International Organization 62 (3):531–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 1999. Subversive Institutions: The Design and the Destruction of Socialism and the State. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, David B., and Signorino, Curtis S.. 2010. Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data. Political Analysis 18 (3):271–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Antonio. 1979. Political Self-Determination: Old Concepts and New Developments. In UN Law/Fundamental Rights: Two Topics in International Law, edited by Cassese, Antonio, 137–67. Alphanaanden Rijn, Netherlands: Sijthoff and Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Girardin, Luc. 2007. Beyond Fractionalization: Mapping Ethnicity onto Nationalist Insurgencies. American Political Science Review 101 (1):173–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik, Wimmer, Andreas, and Min, Brian. 2010. Why Do Ethnic Group Rebel? New Data and Analysis. World Politics 62 (1):87119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1999. Social Construction and Integration. Journal of European Public Policy 6 (4):545–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, Kathleen Gallagher. 2013. Understanding Strategic Choice: The Determinants of Civil War and Nonviolent Campaign in Self-determination Disputes. Journal of Peace Research 50 (3): 291304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, Kathleen Gallagher. 2014. Insides the Politics of Self-determination. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, Christian, and Trivedi, Priyamvada. 2013. Activism and Awareness Resistance, Cognitive Activation, and “Seeing” Untouchability Among 98,316 Dalits. Journal of Peace Research 50 (3):369–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazal, Tanisha, and Griffiths, Ryan. 2014. Membership Has Its Privileges: The Changing Benefits of Statehood. International Studies Review 16 (1):79106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4):887917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Caroline C. 1993. Creating the Nation in Provincial France: Religion and Political Identity in Brittany. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. 1992. The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance. American Journal of International Law 86 (1):4691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gál, Kinga. 1999. Bilateral Agreements in Central and Eastern Europe: A New Inter-State Framework for Minority Protection? ECMI Working Paper #4. Flensburg, Germany: European Center for Minority Issues.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer. 2006. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. 2007. Transnational Dimensions of Civil War. Journal of Peace Research 44 (3):293309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Ward, Michael D.. 2001. Measuring Space: A Minimum-distance Database and Applications to International Studies. Journal of Peace Research 38 (6):739–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter Alexis. 1979. The Reemergence of “Peripheral Nationalisms”: Some Comparative Speculations on the Spatial Distribution of Political Leadership and Economic Growth. Comparative Studies in Society and History 21 (3):303–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, Ryan. 2015. Between Dissolution and Blood: How Administrative Lines and Categories Shape Secessionist Outcomes. International Organization 69 (3):731–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert. 1970. Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert. 2000. Peoples Versus States: Minorities at Risk in the New Century. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Henry. 2000. The Parade of Sovereignties: Testing Theories of Secession in the Setting. British Journal of Political Science 30 (1):3156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanmer, Michael J., and Kalkan, Kerem Ozan. 2013. Behind the Curve: Clarifying the Best Approach to Calculating Predicted Probabilities and Marginal Effects from Limited Dependent Variable Models. American Journal of Political Science 57 (1):263–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 1995. One for All: The Logic of Group Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hechter, Michael. 1975. Internal Colonialism: The Celtic Fringe in British National Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Henderson, Conway. 1991. Conditions Affecting the Use of Political Repression. Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (1):120–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensel, Paul. 2014. ICOW Colonial History Data Set, version 1.0. Available at <http://www.paulhensel.org/icowcol.html>..>Google Scholar
Jácome, Francine. 2011. El impacto de los cambios constitucionales en la región Andina. In América Latina y el Caribe: Globalización y conocimiento, edited by Rojas, Francisco and Álvarez, Andrea, 273310. Montevideo, Uruguay: Repensar las Ciencias Sociales, FLACSO, and UNESCO.Google Scholar
Jenne, Erin. 2004. A Bargaining Theory of Minority Demands: Explaining the Dog that Did Not Bite in 1990s Yugoslavia. International Studies Quarterly 48 (4):729–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaya, Nilay Çabuk, and Erdemir, Aykan. 2008. Social Dynamics of Global Terrorism and Prevention Policies. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Lujala, Päivi. 2010. The Spoils of Nature: Armed Civil Conflict and Rebel Access to Natural Resources. Journal of Peace Research 47 (1):1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., Jaggers, Keith, and Gurr, Ted Robert. 2012. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2010. Dataset: Users’ Manual. Vienna, VA: Center for Systemic Peace.Google Scholar
Manela, Erez. 2009. The Wilsonian Moment: Self-determination and the International Origins of Anticolonial Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nome, Martin Austvoll, and Weidmann, Nils B.. 2013. Conflict Diffusion via Social Identities. In Transnational Dynamics of Civil War, edited by Checkel, Jeffrey T., 173202. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Philpott, Daniel. 2001. Revolutions in Sovereignty: How Ideas Shaped Modern International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Poe, Steven C., and Tate, Neal. 1994. Repression of Human Rights to Personal Integrity in the 1980s: A Global Analysis. American Political Science Review 88 (4):853–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeder, Philip G. 1991. Soviet Federalism and Ethnic Mobilization. World Politics 43 (1):196232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeder, Philip G. 2009. Ethnofederalism and the Mismanagement of Conflicting Nationalisms. Regional and Federal Studies 19 (2):203–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RT. 2015. Catalonia Independence: Parliament Votes to Start Secession from Spain. RT News, 9 November. Available at <https://www.rt.com/news/321276-catalonia-parliament-back-independence/>..>Google Scholar
Saideman, Stephen M. 1997. Explaining the International Relations of Secessionist Conflicts: Vulnerability Versus Ethnic Ties. International Organization 51 (4):721–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sànchez-Cuenca, Ignacio. 2007. The Dynamics of Nationalist Terrorism: ETA and the IRA. Terrorism and Political Violence 19 (3):289306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., Dobbin, Frank, and Garrett, Geoffrey, eds. 2007. The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sohn, Louis B. 1981. Models of Autonomy Within the United Nations Framework. In Models of Autonomy, edited by Dinstein, Yoram 522. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 1994. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1982. Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Annual Review of Psychology 33:139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Themnér, Lotta, and Wallensteen, Peter. 2013. Armed Conflict, 1946–2012. Journal of Peace Research 50 (4):509–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toft, Monica Duffy. 2003. The Geography of Ethnic Violence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Varshney, Ashutosh. 2003. Nationalism, Ethnic Conflict, and Rationality. Perspectives on Politics 1 (1):8599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. 2006. Building Reputation: Why Governments Fight Some Separatists but Not Others. American Journal of Political Science 50 (2):313–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas, and Feinstein, Yuval. 2010. The Rise of the Nation-State across the World, 1816 to 2001. American Sociological Review 75 (5):764–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Reed M., and Gibney, Mark. 2010. The Political Terror Scale (PTS): A Re-introduction and a Comparison to CIRI. Human Rights Quarterly 32 (2):367400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2013. World Development Indicators 2013. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Zhukov, Yuri M., and Stewart, Brandon M.. 2013. Choosing Your Neighbors: Networks of Diffusion in International Relations. International Studies Quarterly 57 (2):271–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cunningham and Sawyer supplementary material

Cunningham and Sawyer supplementary material 1

Download Cunningham and Sawyer supplementary material(File)
File 1 MB
8
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Is Self-determination Contagious? A Spatial Analysis of the Spread of Self-Determination Claims
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Is Self-determination Contagious? A Spatial Analysis of the Spread of Self-Determination Claims
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Is Self-determination Contagious? A Spatial Analysis of the Spread of Self-Determination Claims
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *