Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-xt4p2 Total loading time: 0.499 Render date: 2022-05-28T01:46:35.819Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politics in the Global Economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2011

Thomas Oatley
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. E-mail: oatley@unc.edu
Get access

Abstract

International political economy (IPE) should transition to “third-wave” scholarship because Open Economy Politics (OEP), which dominates current American IPE scholarship, can generate inaccurate knowledge. OEP can produce inaccurate knowledge because it studies domestic politics in isolation from international or macro processes. This methodological reductionism is often inappropriate for the phenomena IPE studies because governments inhabit a complex social system. As a result, the political choices that OEP strives to explain are typically a product of the interplay between domestic politics and macro processes. When OEP omits causally significant macro processes from empirical models, the models yield biased inferences about the domestic political relationships under investigation. Although scholars tolerated such errors when the gains from OEP were large, these errors are less tolerable now that OEP has matured. Consequently, the field should transition toward research that is nonreductionist, problem-driven, and pluralistic.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adserà, Alícia, and Boix, Carles. 2002. Trade, Democracy, and the Size of the Public Sector: The Political Underpinnings of Openness. International Organization 56 (2):229–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, James E., Carlsen, Fredrik, Heum, Per, and Johansen, Kåre. 1999. Asset Specificity and the Political Behavior of Firms: Lobbying for Subsidies in Norway. International Organization 53 (1):99116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayala, Francisco J. 1974. “Introduction.” In Studies in the Philosophy of Biology: Reduction and Related Problems, edited by Ayala, Francisco J. and Dobzhansky, Theodosius G., vii–xvi. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, John H., Goldstein, Judith L., Josling, Timothy E., and Steinberg, Richard H.. 2006. The Evolution of the Trade Regime: Politics, Law, and Economics of the GATT and the WTO. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bauerle Danzman, Sarah. 2010. Making Treaties Matter. M.A. thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Bearce, David H. 2003. Societal Preferences, Partisan Agents, and Monetary Policy Outcomes. International Organization 57 (2):373410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Epstein, David, Jackman, Simon, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 2001. Alternative Models of Dynamics in Binary Time-Series-Cross-Section Models: The Example of State Failure. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, July, Atlanta, Ga. Available at ⟨http://polmeth.wustl.edu/media/Paper/beck01.pdf⟩. Accessed 4 January 2011.Google Scholar
Bernhard, William, and Leblang, David. 1999. Democratic Institutions and Exchange-Rate Commitments. International Organization 53 (1):7197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, William, and Leblang, David. 2002. Political Parties and Monetary Commitments. International Organization 56 (4):803–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Graham. 1996. The International Monetary Fund and Developing Countries: A Review of the Evidence and Policy Options. International Organization 50 (3):477511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William Roberts, and Golder, Matt. 2006. Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political Analysis 14 (1):6382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brigandt, Ingo, and Love, Alan. 2008. Reductionism in Biology. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford, Calif.: The Metaphysics Research Lab, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University. Available at ⟨http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reduction-biology/⟩. Accessed 4 January 2011.Google Scholar
Broz, J. Lawrence. 1998. The Origins of Central Banking: Solutions to the Free-Rider Problem. International Organization 52 (2):231–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broz, J. Lawrence. 1999. Origins of the Federal Reserve System: International Incentives and the Domestic Free-Rider Problem. International Organization 53 (1):3970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broz, J. Lawrence. 2002. Political System Transparency and Monetary Commitment Regimes. International Organization 56 (4):861–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoon, Brian. 2001. Globalization and Welfare Compensation: Disentangling the Ties that Bind. International Organization 55 (3):509–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, Kerry A. 2003. Economic Interests and Regional Trading Arrangements: The Case of NAFTA. International Organization 57 (1):137–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, William Roberts. 2002. Partisan and Electoral Motivations and the Choice of Monetary Institutions Under Fully Mobile Capital. International Organization 56 (4):725–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, William Roberts, and Hallerberg, Mark. 2000. Mobile Capital, Domestic Institutions, and Electorally Induced Monetary and Fiscal Policy. American Political Science Review 94 (2):323–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, William Roberts, Reichert, Usha Nair, Lomas, Sandra Lynn, and Parker, Kevin. 1998. International and Domestic Constraints on Political Business Cycles in OECD Economies. International Organization 52 (1):87120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Benjamin J. 2007. The Transatlantic Divide: Why Are American and British IPE so Different? Review of International Political Economy 14 (2):197219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Benjamin J. 2008. International Political Economy: An Intellectual History. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cranmer, Skyler J., and Desmarais, Bruce A.. 2011. Inferential Network Analysis with Exponential Random Graph Models. Political Analysis 19 (1):6686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2004. Conditioning the Effects of Aid: Cold War Politics, Donor Credibility, and Democracy in Africa. International Organization 58 (2):409–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry, Rose, Andrew, and Wyplosz, Charles. 1996. Contagious Currency Crises: First Tests. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 98 (4):463–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, David, and O'Halloran, Sharyn. 1996. The Partisan Paradox and the U.S. Tariff, 1877–1934. International Organization 50 (2):301–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Henry, and Finnemore, Martha. 2009. Ontology, Methodology, and Causation in the American School of International Political Economy. Review of International Political Economy 16 (1):5871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Henry, and Newman, Abraham L.. Forthcoming. Making International Markets: Domestic Institutions in International Political Economy. Review of International Political Economy.Google Scholar
Fioretos, Orfeo. 2011. Historical Institutionalism in International Relations. International Organization 65 (2):367–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordham, Benjamin O. 1998. Economic Interests, Party, and Ideology in Early Cold War Era U.S. Foreign Policy. International Organization 52 (2):359–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordham, Benjamin O., and McKeown, Timothy J.. 2003. Selection and Influence: Interest Groups and Congressional Voting on Trade Policy. International Organization 57 (3):519–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry A. 2002. Real Sources of European Currency Policy: Sectoral Interests and European Monetary Integration. International Organization 56 (4):831–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry A., and Lake, David A.. 2005. International Relations as a Social Science: Rigor and Relevance. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 600 (1):136–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frieden, Jeffry A., and Martin, Lisa L.. 2002. International Political Economy: Global and Domestic Interactions. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, edited by Katznelson, Ira and Milner, Helen V., 118–46. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Friedrichs, Jörg, and Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2009. On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology. International Organization 63 (4):701–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John, and Thacker, Strom C.. 2004. Political Institutions and Corruption: The Role of Unitarism and Parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science 34 (2):295330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Micheal W., and Garand, James C.. 2007. Ranking Political Science Journals: Reputational and Citational Approaches. PS: Political Science & Politics 40 (4):741–51.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Arthur A. 2001. Foreign Aid and Statehood in Africa. International Organization 55 (1):123–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Judith L., Rivers, Douglas, and Tomz, Michael. 2007. Institutions in International Relations: Understanding the Effects of the GATT and the WTO on World Trade. International Organization 61 (1):3767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter. 1978. The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics. International Organization 32 (4):881912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie, Kahler, Miles, and Montgomery, Alexander. 2009. Network Analysis for International Relations. International Organization 63 (3):559–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Franzese, Robert J.. 1998. Mixed Signals: Central Bank Independence, Coordinated Wage Bargaining, and European Monetary Union. International Organization 52 (3):505–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallerberg, Mark. 2002. Veto Players and the Choice of Monetary Institutions. International Organization 56 (4):775802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Wendy L., and Mitchell, Neil J.. 2000. Disaggregating and Explaining Corporate Political Activity: Domestic and Foreign Corporations in National Politics. American Political Science Review 94 (4):891903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, Oona A. 1998. Positive Feedback: The Impact of Trade Liberalization on Industry Demands for Protection. International Organization 52 (3):575612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, Jude C., Ehrlich, Sean D., and Peinhardt, Clint. 2005. Government Spending and Public Support for Trade in the OECD: An Empirical Test of the Embedded Liberalism Thesis. International Organization 59 (2):473–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, Jude C., Kachi, Aya, and Franzese, Robert J. Jr. 2010. A Spatial Model Incorporating Dynamic, Endogenous Network Interdependence: A Political Science Application. Statistical Methodology 7 (3):406–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellmann, Gunther. 2009. Pragmatism and International Relations. International Studies Review 11 (3):638–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiscox, Michael J. 1999. The Magic Bullet? The RTAA, Institutional Reform, and Trade Liberalization. International Organization 53 (4):669–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiscox, Michael J. 2001. Class Versus Industry Cleavages: Inter-Industry Factor Mobility and the Politics of Trade. International Organization 55 (1):146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiscox, Michael J. 2002. International Trade and Political Conflict: Commerce, Coalitions, and Mobility. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben. 1998. Wage Bargaining, Central Bank Independence, and the Real Effects of Money. International Organization 52 (3):469504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, Simon. 2000. In and Out of War and Peace: Transitional Models of International Conflict. Stanford, Calif.: Department of Political Science, Stanford University. Available at ⟨http://jackman.stanford.edu/papers/inandout.pdf⟩. Accessed 4 January 2011.Google Scholar
Jensen, Nathan M. 2003. Democratic Governance and Multinational Corporations: Political Regimes and Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment. International Organization 57 (3):587616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, James. 2006. Consequences of Positivism: A Pragmatist Assessment. Comparative Political Studies 39 (2):224–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, Miles, ed. 2009. Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kang, David C. 2002. Bad Loans to Good Friends: Money Politics and the Developmental State in South Korea. International Organization 56 (1):177207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karol, David. 2000. Divided Government and U.S. Trade Policy: Much Ado About Nothing? International Organization 54 (4):825–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 2009. Mid-Atlantic: Sitting on the Knife's Sharp Edge. Review of International Political Economy 16 (1):122–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefer, Philip, and Stasavage, David. 2002. Checks and Balances, Private Information, and the Credibility of Monetary Commitments. International Organization 56 (4):751–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefer, Philip, and Stasavage, David. 2003. The Limits of Delegation: Veto Players, Central Bank Independence, and the Credibility of Monetary Policy. American Political Science Review 97 (3):407–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 2009. The Old IPE and the New. Review of International Political Economy 16 (1):3446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Nye, Joseph. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P. 1973. The World in Depression, 1929–1939. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Tomz, Michael, and Wittenberg, Jason. 2000. Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2):347–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosack, Stephen, and Tobin, Jennifer. 2006. Funding Self-Sustaining Development: The Role of Aid, FDI, and Government in Economic Success. International Organization 60 (1):205–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1976. State Power and the Structure of International Trade. World Politics 28 (3):317–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D., ed. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ladewig, Jeffrey W. 2006. Domestic Influences on International Trade Policy: Factor Mobility in the United States, 1963 to 1992. International Organization 60 (1):69103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 2006. International Political Economy: A Maturing Interdiscipline. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, edited by Weingast, Barry R. and Wittman, Donald A., 757–77. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 2009a. TRIPs Across the Atlantic: Theory and Epistemology in IPE. Review of International Political Economy 16 (1):4757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 2009b. Open Economy Politics: A Critical Review. Review of International Organizations 4 (3):219–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leblang, David, and Bernhard, William. 2000. The Politics of Speculative Attacks in Industrial Democracies. International Organization 54 (2):291324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leblang, David, and Satyanath, Shanker. 2006. Institutions, Expectations, and Currency Crises. International Organization 60 (1):245–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Quan, and Resnick, Adam. 2003. Reversal of Fortunes: Democratic Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows to Developing Countries. International Organization 57 (1):175211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Andrew. 2001. Institutions and Investors: The Politics of the Economic Crisis in Southeast Asia. International Organization 55 (1):81122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maliniak, Daniel, and Tierney, Michael J.. 2009. The American School of IPE. Review of International Political Economy 16 (1):633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manger, Mark S. 2009. Investing in Protection: The Politics of Preferential Trade Agreements between North and South. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mares, Isabela. 2004. Economic Insecurity and Social Policy Expansion: Evidence from Interwar Europe. International Organization 58 (4):745–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Kathleen R. 2009. Of Intellectual Monocultures and the Study of IPE. Review of International Political Economy 16 (1):7284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meissner, Christopher M. 2005. A New World Order: Explaining the International Diffusion of the Gold Standard, 1870–1913. Journal of International Economics 66 (2):385406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Helen V. 1988. Resisting Protectionism: Global Industries and the Politics of International Trade. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V., and Kubota, Keiko. 2005. Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries. International Organization 59 (1):107–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosley, Layna. 2000. Room to Move: International Financial Markets and National Welfare States. International Organization 54 (4):737–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, Bumba, Smith, Dale L., and Li, Quan. 2009. Labor (Im)mobility and the Politics of Trade Protection in Majoritarian Democracies. Journal of Politics 71 (1):291308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Nancey. 1998. Supervenience and the Nonreducibility of Ethics to Biology. In Evolutionary and Molecular Biology: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, edited by Russell, Robert J., Stoeger, William R., and Ayala, Francisco J., 463–90. Vatican City: Vatican Observatory Publications/Berkeley, Calif.: Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences.Google Scholar
Noland, Marcus. 1997. Chasing Phantoms: The Political Economy of USTR. International Organization 51 (3):365–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Nicola. 2009. The Slow Death of Pluralism. Review of International Political Economy 16 (1):8594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitruzzello, Salvatore. 2004. Trade Globalization, Economic Performance, and Social Protection: Nineteenth-Century British Laissez-Faire and Post–World War II U.S.-Embedded Liberalism. International Organization 58 (4):705–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polkinghorne, John C.n.d. Reductionism. In Interdisciplinary Encyclopedia of Religion and Science, edited by Tanzella-Nitti, Giuseppe, Larrey, Philip, and Strumia, Alberto. Available at ⟨http://www.disf.org/en/Voci/104.asp⟩. Accessed 4 January 2011.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Francisco, and Rodrik, Dani. 2000. Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic's Guide to the Cross-National Evidence. In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2000, edited by Bernanke, Ben S. and Rogoff, Kenneth, 261325. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rudra, Nita. 2002. Globalization and the Decline of the Welfare State in Less-Developed Countries. International Organization 56 (2):411–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saban, Daniela, Bonomoa, Flavia, and Stier-Mosesc, Nicolás E.. 2010. Analysis and Models of Bilateral Investment Treaties Using a Social Networks Approach. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 389 (17):3661–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, Jeffrey D., and Warner, Andrew. 1995. Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration. In Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Vol. 1, edited by Brainard, William C. and Perry, George L., 1118. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth. 2004. Public Inflation Aversion and the Political Economy of Macroeconomics Policymaking. International Organization 58 (1):134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnietz, Karen E. 2003. The Reaction of Private Interests to the 1934 Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act. International Organization 57 (1):213–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 2002. Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, or What's Wrong with Political Science and What to Do About It. Political Theory 30 (4):596619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 1996. Rulers of the Game: Central Bank Independence During the Interwar Years. International Organization 50 (3):407–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., Dobbin, Frank, and Garrett, Geoffrey. 2006. Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism. International Organization 60 (4):781810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., and Elkins, Zachary. 2004. The Globalization of Liberalization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy. American Political Science Review 98 (1):171–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., and Hainmueller, Jens. 2005. Can Domestic Institutions Explain Exchange Rate Regime Choice? The Political Economy of Monetary Institutions Reconsidered. Paper presented at the 63d Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April, Chicago.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1962. The Architecture of Complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106 (6):467–82.Google Scholar
Stone, Randall W. 2004. The Political Economy of IMF Lending in Africa. American Political Science Review 98 (4):577–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strang, David, and Chang, Patricia Mei Yin. 1993. The International Labor Organization and the Welfare State: Institutional Effects on National Welfare Spending, 1960–80. International Organization 47 (2):235–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdier, Daniel. 1998. Domestic Responses to Capital Market Internationalization Under the Gold Standard, 1870–1914. International Organization 52 (1):134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdier, Daniel. 2001. Capital Mobility and the Origins of Stock Markets. International Organization 55 (2):327–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacziarg, Romain, and Welch, Karen Horn. 2008. Trade Liberalization and Growth: New Evidence. World Bank Economic Review 22 (2):187231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1986. Reductionist and Systemic Theories. In Neorealism and Its Critics, edited by Keohane, Robert O., 4769. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wibbels, Erik, and Arce, Moisés. 2003. Globalization, Taxation, and Burden-Shifting in Latin America. International Organization 57 (1):111–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Trade Organization. n.d. The Regulation of State Trading Under the WTO System. Available at ⟨http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/statra_e/statrad.htm⟩. Accessed 4 January 2011.Google Scholar
110
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politics in the Global Economy
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politics in the Global Economy
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politics in the Global Economy
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *