Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations

  • Daniel Maliniak (a1), Ryan Powers (a2) and Barbara F. Walter (a3)

This article investigates the extent to which citation and publication patterns differ between men and women in the international relations (IR) literature. Using data from the Teaching, Research, and International Policy project on peer-reviewed publications between 1980 and 2006, we show that women are systematically cited less than men after controlling for a large number of variables including year of publication, venue of publication, substantive focus, theoretical perspective, methodology, tenure status, and institutional affiliation. These results are robust to a variety of modeling choices. We then turn to network analysis to investigate the extent to which the gender of an article's author affects that article's relative centrality in the network of citations between papers in our sample. Articles authored by women are systematically less central than articles authored by men, all else equal. This is likely because (1) women tend to cite themselves less than men, and (2) men (who make up a disproportionate share of IR scholars) tend to cite men more than women. This is the first study in political science to reveal significant gender differences in citation patterns and is especially meaningful because citation counts are increasingly used as a key measure of research's quality and impact.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Marijke Breuning , Joseph Bredehoft , and Eugene Walton . 2005. Promise and Performance: An Evaluation of Journals in International Relations. International Studies Perspectives 6 (4):447–61.

Carolyn A. Copenheaver , Kyrille Goldbeck , and Paolo Cherubini . 2010. Lack of Gender Bias in Citation Rates of Publications by Dendrochronologists: What Is Unique About This Discipline? Tree-Ring Research 66 (2):127–33.

Nicky Dries , Roland Pepermans , and Olivier Carlier . 2008. Career Success: Constructing a Multidimensional Model. Journal of Vocational Behavior 73 (2):254–67.

Marianne A. Ferber , and Michael Brün . 2011. The Gender Gap in Citations: Does It Persist? Feminist Economics 17 (1):151–58.

Ada W. Finifter 1973. The Professional Status of Women Political Scientists: Some Current Data. PS: Political Science and Politics 6 (4):406–19.

James H. Fowler , and Dag W. Aksnes . 2007. Does Self-Citation Pay? Scientometrics 72 (3):427–37.

Georg Franck . 1999. Scientific Communication: A Vanity Fair? Science 286 (5437):5355.

Martin Gruberg , and Virginia Sapiro . 1979. Participation by Women in Annual Meetings, 1970–78. PS: Political Science and Politics 12 (3):318–24.

Simon Hix . 2004. A Global Ranking of Political Science Departments. Political Studies Review 2 (3):293313.

Guido W. Imbens 2000. The Role of the Propensity Score in Estimating Dose-Response Functions. Biometrika 87 (3):706–10.

Kelly M. Kadera 2013. The Social Underpinnings of Women's Worth in the Study of World Politics: Culture, Leader Emergence, and Coauthorship. International Studies Perspectives.

Jon M. Kleinberg 1999. Authoritative Sources in a Hyperlinked Environment. Journal of the ACM 46 (5):604–32.

J. Scott Long . 1992. Measures of Sex Differences in Scientific Productivity. Social Forces 71 (1):159178.

Daniel Maliniak , Amy Oakes , Susan Peterson , and Michael J. Tierney . 2011. International Relations in the US Academy. International Studies Quarterly 55 (2):437–64.

Celia Sánchez Peñas , and Peter Willett . 2006. Brief Communication: Gender Differences in Publication and Citation Counts in Librarianship and Information Science Research. Journal of Information Science 32 (5):480–85.

Victoria Schuck . 1969. Women in Political Science: Some Preliminary Observations. PS: Political Science and Politics 2 (4):642–53.

Jacob B. Slyder , Beth R. Stein , Brent S. Sams , David M. Walker , B. Jacob Beale , Jeffrey J. Feldhaus , and Carolyn A. Copenheaver . 2011. Citation Pattern and Lifespan: A Comparison of Discipline, Institution, and Individual. Scientometrics 89 (3):955966.

Gerhard Sonnert . 1995. What Makes a Good Scientist? Determinants of Peer Evaluation Among Biologists. Social Studies of Science 25 (1):3555.

Matthew R.E. Symonds , Neil J. Gemmell , Tamsin L. Braisher , Kylie L. Gorringe , and Mark A. Elgar . 2006. Gender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance. PLoS ONE 1 (1):e127. Available at ⟨⟩. Accessed 8 May 2013.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Maliniak Supplementary Material

 Word (119 KB)
119 KB
Supplementary Materials

Maliniak Supplementary Material
Maliniak Supplementary Material

 Unknown (14 KB)
14 KB
Supplementary Materials

Maliniak Supplementary Material
Maliniak Supplementary Material

 Unknown (9.7 MB)
9.7 MB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 21
Total number of PDF views: 187 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1724 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.