Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations

  • Daniel Maliniak (a1), Ryan Powers (a2) and Barbara F. Walter (a3)
Abstract
Abstract

This article investigates the extent to which citation and publication patterns differ between men and women in the international relations (IR) literature. Using data from the Teaching, Research, and International Policy project on peer-reviewed publications between 1980 and 2006, we show that women are systematically cited less than men after controlling for a large number of variables including year of publication, venue of publication, substantive focus, theoretical perspective, methodology, tenure status, and institutional affiliation. These results are robust to a variety of modeling choices. We then turn to network analysis to investigate the extent to which the gender of an article's author affects that article's relative centrality in the network of citations between papers in our sample. Articles authored by women are systematically less central than articles authored by men, all else equal. This is likely because (1) women tend to cite themselves less than men, and (2) men (who make up a disproportionate share of IR scholars) tend to cite men more than women. This is the first study in political science to reveal significant gender differences in citation patterns and is especially meaningful because citation counts are increasingly used as a key measure of research's quality and impact.

Copyright
References
Hide All
American Political Science Association (APSA). 1992. Improving the Status of Women in Political Science: A Report with Recommendations. PS: Political Science and Politics 25 (3):547–54.
American Political Science Association (APSA). 2004. Report of Workplace and Family Issues Subcommittee. Available at ⟨https://www.apsanet.org/imgtest/APSAReportofWorkplace&FamilyIssuesSubcmt2.pdf⟩. Accessed 8 May 2013.
American Political Science Association (APSA). 2007. Data Snapshot: The Proportion of Women in the Political Science Profession. Available at ⟨https://www.apsanet.org/imgtest/Website%20brief%20on%20women%20in%20PS%20v2%201%202007.pdf⟩. Accessed 8 May 2013.
Breuning Marijke, Bredehoft Joseph, and Walton Eugene. 2005. Promise and Performance: An Evaluation of Journals in International Relations. International Studies Perspectives 6 (4):447–61.
Büthe Tim, and Aggarwal Vinod. 2013. Citation Counts: Measuring Impact in the Social Science. Unpublished manuscript, Duke University, Durham, N.C., and University of California, Berkeley.
Charles Maria, and Grusky David B.. 2005. Occupational Ghettos: The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Copenheaver Carolyn A., Goldbeck Kyrille, and Cherubini Paolo. 2010. Lack of Gender Bias in Citation Rates of Publications by Dendrochronologists: What Is Unique About This Discipline? Tree-Ring Research 66 (2):127–33.
Dries Nicky, Pepermans Roland, and Carlier Olivier. 2008. Career Success: Constructing a Multidimensional Model. Journal of Vocational Behavior 73 (2):254–67.
Ferber Marianne A., and Brün Michael. 2011. The Gender Gap in Citations: Does It Persist? Feminist Economics 17 (1):151–58.
Finifter Ada W. 1973. The Professional Status of Women Political Scientists: Some Current Data. PS: Political Science and Politics 6 (4):406–19.
Fisher Bonnie S., Cobane Craig T., Vander Ven Thomas M., and Cullen Francis T.. 1998. How Many Authors Does It Take to Publish an Article? Trends and Patterns in Political Science. PS: Political Science and Politics 34 (4):847–56.
Fowler James H., and Aksnes Dag W.. 2007. Does Self-Citation Pay? Scientometrics 72 (3):427–37.
Fowler James H., Grofman Bernard, and Masuoka Natalie. 2007. Social Networks in Political Science: Hiring and Placement of PhDs, 1960–2002. PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (4):729–39.
Franck Georg. 1999. Scientific Communication: A Vanity Fair? Science 286 (5437):5355.
Ginther Donna K. 2004. Gender Differences in Salary and Promotion in Political Science. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association workshop on “Women in the Profession,” March, Washington, D.C.
Gruberg Martin, and Sapiro Virginia. 1979. Participation by Women in Annual Meetings, 1970–78. PS: Political Science and Politics 12 (3):318–24.
Harzing Anne-Wil. 2010. The Publish or Perish Book: Your Guide to Effective and Responsible Citation Analysis. Melbourne, Australia: Tarma Software Research.
Hesli Vicki L., Lee Jae Mook, and Mitchell Sara McLaughlin. 2012. Predicting Rank Attainment in Political Science: What Else Besides Publications Affects Promotion? PS: Political Science and Politics 45 (3):475–92.
Hix Simon. 2004. A Global Ranking of Political Science Departments. Political Studies Review 2 (3):293313.
Imbens Guido W. 2000. The Role of the Propensity Score in Estimating Dose-Response Functions. Biometrika 87 (3):706–10.
Kadera Kelly M. 2013. The Social Underpinnings of Women's Worth in the Study of World Politics: Culture, Leader Emergence, and Coauthorship. International Studies Perspectives.
King Gary, Keohane Robert O., and Verba Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Kleinberg Jon M. 1999. Authoritative Sources in a Hyperlinked Environment. Journal of the ACM 46 (5):604–32.
Long J. Scott. 1992. Measures of Sex Differences in Scientific Productivity. Social Forces 71 (1):159178.
Lupu Yonatan, and Voeten Erik. 2012. Precedent on International Courts: A Network Analysis of Case Citations by the European Court of Human Rights. British Journal of Political Science 42 (2):413–39.
Maliniak Daniel, Oakes Amy, Peterson Susan, and Tierney Michael J.. 2007. The View from the Ivory Tower: TRIP Survey of IR Faculty in the United States and Canada. Available at ⟨http://www.wm.edu/offices/itpir/_documents/trip/ivory_tower_view_2007.pdf⟩. Accessed 8 May 2013.
Maliniak Daniel, Oakes Amy, Peterson Susan, and Tierney Michael J.. 2008. Women in International Relations. Politics and Gender 4 (1):122–44.
Maliniak Daniel, Oakes Amy, Peterson Susan, and Tierney Michael J.. 2011. International Relations in the US Academy. International Studies Quarterly 55 (2):437–64.
Maliniak Daniel, Peterson Susan, and Tierney Michael J.. 2012. TRIP Around the World: Teaching, Research, and Policy Views of International Relations Faculty in Twenty Countries. Available at ⟨http://www.wm.edu/offices/itpir/_documents/trip/trip_around_the_world_2011.pdf⟩. Accessed 8 May 2013.
Mitchell Sara McLaughlin, Lange Samantha, and Brus Holly. Forthcoming. Gendered Citation Patterns in International Relations Journals. International Studies Perspectives.
Østby Gudrun, Strand Håvard, Gleditsch Nils Petter, and Nordås Ragnhild. Forthcoming. Gender Gap or Gender Bias in Peace Research? A Study of Publication Patterns and Citation Rates for Journal of Peace Research, 1983–2008. International Studies Perspectives.
Peñas Celia Sánchez, and Willett Peter. 2006. Brief Communication: Gender Differences in Publication and Citation Counts in Librarianship and Information Science Research. Journal of Information Science 32 (5):480–85.
Peterson Susan, and Tierney Michael J.. 2010. Codebook and User's Guide for TRIP Journal Article Database. Available at ⟨https://mywebspace.wisc.edu/rpowers/files/trip_codebook_2010.pdf⟩. Accessed 8 May 2013.
Schuck Victoria. 1969. Women in Political Science: Some Preliminary Observations. PS: Political Science and Politics 2 (4):642–53.
Slyder Jacob B., Stein Beth R., Sams Brent S., Walker David M., Beale B. Jacob, Feldhaus Jeffrey J., and Copenheaver Carolyn A.. 2011. Citation Pattern and Lifespan: A Comparison of Discipline, Institution, and Individual. Scientometrics 89 (3):955966.
Sonnert Gerhard. 1995. What Makes a Good Scientist? Determinants of Peer Evaluation Among Biologists. Social Studies of Science 25 (1):3555.
Sonnert Gerhard, and Holton Gerald. 1996. Career Patterns of Women and Men in the Sciences. American Scientist 84 (1):6371.
Symonds Matthew R.E., Gemmell Neil J., Braisher Tamsin L., Gorringe Kylie L., and Elgar Mark A.. 2006. Gender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance. PLoS ONE 1 (1):e127. Available at ⟨http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0000127⟩. Accessed 8 May 2013.
US Department of Education. 2011. Digest of Education Statistics 2010, NCES 2011-015. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Maliniak Supplementary Material
Table

 Word (119 KB)
119 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Maliniak Supplementary Material
Maliniak Supplementary Material

 Unknown (14 KB)
14 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary Materials

Maliniak Supplementary Material
Maliniak Supplementary Material

 Unknown (9.7 MB)
9.7 MB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 50
Total number of PDF views: 271 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2305 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.