Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 28
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Carolan, Gene 2016. Solving the Moro problem: legalizing the Bangsamoro peace process. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, Vol. 8, Issue. 3, p. 212.


    DeRouen, Karl and Chowdhury, Ishita 2016. Mediation, Peacekeeping And Civil War Peace Agreements. Defence and Peace Economics, p. 1.


    Fuhrmann, Matthew and Lupu, Yonatan 2016. Do Arms Control Treaties Work? Assessing the Effectiveness of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. International Studies Quarterly, p. sqw013.


    Thrall, Nathan 2016. The Two-Stage Solution: Toward a Long-Term Israeli-Palestinian Truce. Mediterranean Politics, p. 1.


    Trager, Robert F. 2016. The Diplomacy of War and Peace. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 19, Issue. 1, p. 205.


    Narang, Neil 2015. Assisting Uncertainty: How Humanitarian Aid can Inadvertently Prolong Civil War. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 59, Issue. 1, p. 184.


    Powell, Brenna Marea 2014. Policing post-war transitions: Insecurity, legitimacy and reform in Northern Ireland. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, Vol. 7, Issue. 2-3, p. 165.


    Vukovic, Sinisa 2014. International mediation as a distinct form of conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 61.


    Wallace, Geoffrey P.R. 2014. Martial Law? Military Experience, International Law, and Support for Torture. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 58, Issue. 3, p. 501.


    Huth, Paul K. Croco, Sarah E. and Appel, Benjamin J. 2013. Bringing Law to the Table: Legal Claims, Focal Points, and the Settlement of Territorial Disputes Since 1945. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 57, Issue. 1, p. 90.


    Grundig, Frank Hovi, Jon Underdal, Arild and Aakre, Stine 2012. Self-Enforcing Peace and Environmental Agreements: Toward Scholarly Cross-Fertilization?1. International Studies Review, Vol. 14, Issue. 4, p. 522.


    Resnick, Uri 2012. Explaining post-independence conflict. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, Vol. 5, Issue. 1, p. 31.


    Hoffman, Evan and Bercovitch, Jacob 2011. Examining structural components of peace agreements and their durability. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, Vol. 28, Issue. 4, p. 399.


    Zartner, Dana and Ramos, Jennifer 2011. Human Rights as Reputation Builder: Compliance with the Convention Against Torture. Human Rights Review, Vol. 12, Issue. 1, p. 71.


    Peterson, Timothy M. and Quackenbush, Stephen L. 2010. Not All Peace Years Are Created Equal: Trade, Imposed Settlements, and Recurrent Conflict. International Interactions, Vol. 36, Issue. 4, p. 363.


    Simmons, Beth A. and Danner, Allison 2010. Credible Commitments and the International Criminal Court. International Organization, Vol. 64, Issue. 02, p. 225.


    Simmons, Beth 2010. Treaty Compliance and Violation. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 273.


    Idemudia, Uwafiokun 2009. The changing phases of the Niger Delta conflict: implications for conflict escalation and the return of peace. Conflict, Security & Development, Vol. 9, Issue. 3, p. 307.


    Mattes, Michaela and Savun, Burcu 2009. Fostering Peace After Civil War: Commitment Problems and Agreement Design. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 53, Issue. 3, p. 737.


    Saunders, Phillip C. and Kastner, Scott L. 2009. Bridge over Troubled Water? Envisioning a China-Taiwan Peace Agreement. International Security, Vol. 33, Issue. 4, p. 87.


    ×

Scraps of Paper? Agreements and the Durability of Peace

Abstract

In the aftermath of war, what determines whether peace lasts or fighting resumes, and what can be done to foster durable peace? Drawing on theories of cooperation, I argue that belligerents can overcome the obstacles to peace by implementing measures that alter incentives, reduce uncertainty about intentions, and manage accidents. A counterargument suggests that agreements are epiphenomenal, merely reflecting the underlying probability of war resumption. I test hypotheses about the durability of peace using hazard analysis. Controlling for factors (including the decisiveness of victory, the cost of war, relative capabilities, and others) that affect the baseline prospects for peace, I find that stronger agreements enhance the durability of peace. In particular, measures such as the creation of demilitarized zones, explicit third-party guarantees, peacekeeping, and joint commissions for dispute resolution affect the duration of peace. Agreements are not merely scraps of paper; rather, their content matters in the construction of peace that lasts.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Nathaniel Beck , Jonathan N. Katz , and Richard Tucker . 1998. Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable. American Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 1260–88.

D. Scott Bennett . 1998. Integrating and Testing Models of Rivalry Duration. American Journal of Political Science 42 (4):1200–32.

D. Scott Bennett , and Allan C. Stam III. 2000b. A Universal Test of an Expected Utility Theory of War. International Studies Quarterly 44 (3):451–80.

Geoffrey Blainey . 1973. The Causes of War. New York: Free Press.

Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier , and Bradford S. Jones . 1997. Time Is of the Essence: Event History Models in Political Science. American Journal of Political Science 41 (4):1414–61.

Stuart A. Bremer 1992. Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816–1965. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36 (2):309–41.

James D. Fearon 1997. Signaling Foreign Policy Interests. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (1):6890.

James D. Fearon 1998. Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation. International Organization 52 (2):269305.

Gary Goertz , and Paul F. Diehl . 1992. The Empirical Importance of Enduring Rivalries. International Interactions 18 (2):151–63.

Gary Goertz , and Paul F. Diehl . 1993. Enduring Rivalries: Theoretical Constructs and Empirical Patterns. International Studies Quarterly 37 (2):147–71.

Gary Goertz , and Paul F. Diehl . 1995. The Initiation and Termination of Enduring Rivalries: The Impact of Political Shocks. American Journal of Political Science 39 (1):3052.

Caroline Hartzell , Mathew Hoddie , and Donald Rothchild . 2001. Research Note: Stabilizing the Peace After Civil War: An Investigation of Some Key Variables. International Organization 55 (1): 183208.

Paul R. Hensel 1994. One Thing Leads to Another: Recurrent Militarized Disputes in Latin America, 1816–1986. Journal of Peace Research 31 (3):281297.

Robert Jervis . 1993. Arms Control, Stability, and Causes of War. Political Science Quarterly 108 (2):239–53.

Daniel M. Jones , Stuart A. Bremer , and J. David Singer . 1996. Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1816–1992: Rationale, Coding Rules, and Empirical Patterns. Conflict Management and Peace Science 15 (2): 163213.

Brett Ashley Leeds , Andrew G. Long , and Sara McLaughlin Mitchell . 2000. Reevaluating Alliance Reliability: Specific Threats, Specific Promises. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (5):686–99.

Edward Mansfield , and Jack Snyder . 1995. Democratization and the Danger of War. International Security 20 (1):538.

Zeev Maoz . 1984. Peace by Empire: Conflict Outcomes and International Stability, 1816–1976. Journal of Peace Research 21 (3):227–41.

John J. Mearsheimer 1994. The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security 19 (3):549.

Hugh Miall . 1992. The Peacemakers: Peaceful Settlement of Disputes Since 1945. New York: St. Martin's Press.

Terry M. Moe 1984. The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science 28 (4):739–77.

Dan Reiter . 1995. Exploding the Powder Keg Myth: Preemptive Wars Almost Never Happen. International Security 20 (2):534.

Curt S. Signorino , and Jeffrey M. Ritter . 1999. Tau-B or Not Tau-B: Measuring the Similarity of Foreign Policy Positions. International Studies Quarterly 43 (1): 115–44.

Allan C. Stam 1996. Win, Lose, or Draw: Domestic Politics and the Crucible of War. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Douglas M. Stinnett , and Paul F. Diehl . 2001. The Path(s) to Rivalry: Behavioral and Structural Explanations of Rivalry Development. Journal of Politics 63 (3):717–40.

Suzanne Werner . 1999. The Precarious Nature of Peace: Resolving the Issues, Enforcing the Settlement and Renegotiating the Terms. American Journal of Political Science 43 (3):912–34.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×