Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 38
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Agnew, John 2016. Spatializing Politics. Territory, Politics, Governance, Vol. 4, Issue. 3, p. 265.


    Jones, Charles 2016. Cooperation and Hegemony in US-Latin American Relations.


    Rezvani, David A. 2016. Partial Independence Beats Full Independence. Territory, Politics, Governance, Vol. 4, Issue. 3, p. 269.


    Patrick, Stewart 2015. America, China, and the Struggle for World Order.


    CUTTERHAM, TOM 2014. The International Dimension of the Federal Constitution. Journal of American Studies, Vol. 48, Issue. 02, p. 501.


    Selinger, Jeffrey S. 2014. Making Sense of Presidential Restraint: Foundational Arrangements and Executive Decision Making before the Civil War. Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 44, Issue. 1, p. 27.


    Glencross, Andrew 2012. The uses of ambiguity: representing ‘the people’ and the stability of states unions. International Theory, Vol. 4, Issue. 01, p. 107.


    Saltzman, Ilai Z. 2012. Soft Balancing as Foreign Policy: Assessing American Strategy toward Japan in the Interwar Period. Foreign Policy Analysis, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 131.


    Haldén, Peter 2011. Understanding the EU, the US and their external spheres of rule: republican synergies, destructive feedbacks and dependencies. Journal of Political Power, Vol. 4, Issue. 3, p. 433.


    Heumann, Stefan 2011. State, nation, and empire: the formation of the US. Journal of Political Power, Vol. 4, Issue. 3, p. 375.


    GRIFFITHS, RYAN D. 2010. Security threats, linguistic homogeneity, and the necessary conditions for political unification. Nations and Nationalism, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 169.


    Larkins, Jeremy 2010. From Hierarchy to Anarchy.


    Coutain, Bryan 2009. The Unconditional Most-Favored-Nation Clause and the Maintenance of the Liberal Trade Regime in the Postwar 1870s. International Organization, Vol. 63, Issue. 01, p. 139.


    Donnelly, Jack 2009. Rethinking political structures: from ‘ordering principles’ to ‘vertical differentiation’ – and beyond. International Theory, Vol. 1, Issue. 01, p. 49.


    Locatelli, Andrea and Testoni, Michele 2009. Intra-allied competition and alliance durability: the case for promoting a division of labour among NATO allies. European Security, Vol. 18, Issue. 3, p. 345.


    Bernstein, Steven Lebow, Richard Ned Stein, Janice Gross and Weber, Steven 2007. Theory and Evidence in Comparative Politics and International Relations.


    Barnett, Michael 2006. Building a Republican Peace: Stabilizing States after War. International Security, Vol. 30, Issue. 4, p. 87.


    Mayhew, David R. 2005. Wars and American Politics. Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 3, Issue. 03,


    WHITTINGTON, KEITH E. 2005. “Interpose Your Friendly Hand”: Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court. American Political Science Review, Vol. 99, Issue. 04,


    Howard, Peter 2004. The Growing Role of States in U.S. Foreign Policy: The Case of the State Partnership Program. International Studies Perspectives, Vol. 5, Issue. 2, p. 179.


    ×

The Philadelphian system: sovereignty, arms control, and balance of power in the American states-union, circa 1787–1861

  • Daniel H. Deudney (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002837X
  • Published online: 01 May 2009
Abstract

A rediscovery of the long-forgotten republican version of liberal political theory has arresting implications for the theory and practice of international relations. Republican liberalism has a theory of security that is superior to realism, because it addresses not only threats of war from other states but also the threat of despotism at home. In this view, a Hobson's choice between anarchy and hierarchy is not necessary because an intermediary structure, here dubbed “negarchy,” is also available. The American Union from 1787 until 1861 is a historical example. This Philadelphian system was not a real state since, for example, the union did not enjoy a monopoly of legitimate violence. Yet neither was it a state system, since the American states lacked sufficient autonomy. While it shared some features with the Westphalian system such as balance of power, it differed fundamentally. Its origins owed something to particular conditions of time and place, and the American Civil War ended this system. Yet close analysis indicates that it may have surprising relevance for the future of contemporary issues such as the European Union and nuclear governance.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Maurizio Viroli , From Politics to Reason of State: The Acquisition and Transformation of the Language of Politics 1250–1600 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992)

Nicholas Onuf , “Civitas Maxima: Wolff, Vattel, and the Fate of Republicanism, American Journal of International Law 88 (041994), pp. 288289

Peter S. Onuf , “Reflections on the Founding: Constitutional Historiography in Bicentennial Perspective,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd series, 46 (Summer1989)

Donald Lutz , “The Relative Influence of European Writers in Late Eighteenth Century Political Thought,” American Political Science Review 78 (031984), pp. 8997

Charles Tilly , “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime,” in Peter B. Evans , Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol , eds., Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)

Stephen Krasner , “Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective,” Comparative Political Studies 21 (041988), pp. 6694

Nicholas Onuf , “Sovereignty: Outline of a Conceptual History,” Alternatives, vol. 16, no. 4, 1991, pp. 425446

Kenneth M. Stamp , “The Concept of a Perpetual Union,” Journal of American History 65 (061978), pp. 553

Herbert Storing , What the Antifederalists Were For (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981)

Peter Trubowitz , “Sectionalism and American Foreign Policy: The Political Geography of Consensus and Conflict,” International Studies Quarterly 36 (061992), pp. 173–90

Frederick D. Williams , ed., The Northwest Ordinance: Essays on Its Formulation, Provisions, and Legacy (East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1989)

William Riker , “The Senate in American Federalism,” American Political Science Review 49 (061955), pp. 452469

Adam Watson , The Evolution of International Society (London: Routledge, 1992), pp. 1318

Robert Gilpin , War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981)

Paul Schroeder , “The Nineteenth Century International System: Changes in Structure,” World Politics 39 (101986), pp. 126

Stephen Skrowronek , Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982)

Kalevi J. Holsti , Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order, 1648–1989 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991)

Helen Milner , “The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations: A Critique,” Review of International Studies 17 (011991), pp. 6785

V. G. Kiernan , The Duel in European History: Honour and the Reign of the Aristocracy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986)

Joseph Nye , “Neorealism and Neoliberalism,” World Politics 40 (011988), pp. 235–51 and p. 246 in particular

Alexander Wendt , “Anarchy is What States Make of It,” International Organization 46 (Spring1992), pp. 391–425

Daniel T. Rodgers , “Republicanism: the Career of a Concept,” Journal of American History 79 (061992), pp. 1138

Anne-Marie Burley , “Law Among Liberal States: Liberalism and the Act of State Doctrine,” Columbia Law Review 92 (121992), pp. 1907–96

Daniel Deudney , “Dividing Realism: Security Materialism vs Structural Realism on Nuclear Security and Proliferation,” Security Studies 2 (Spring/Summer1993), pp. 736

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×