Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    de Carvalho, Benjamin 2016. The making of the political subject: subjects and territory in the formation of the state. Theory and Society, Vol. 45, Issue. 1, p. 57.

    Vieira, Marco A. 2016. Understanding Resilience in International Relations: The Non-Aligned Movement and Ontological Security. International Studies Review, Vol. 18, Issue. 2, p. 290.

    Hay, Colin 2014. Neither real nor fictitious but ‘as if real'? A political ontology of the state. The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 65, Issue. 3, p. 459.

    Lindemann, Thomas 2014. Interest, passion, (non)recognition, and wars: a conceptual essay. Global Discourse, Vol. 4, Issue. 4, p. 483.


Theorizing Agency in Hobbes's Wake: The Rational Actor, the Self, or the Speaking Subject?

  • Charlotte Epstein (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 16 April 2013

The rationalist-constructivist divide that runs through the discipline of International Relations (IR) revolves around two figures of agency, the rational actor and the constructivist “self.” In this article I examine the models of agency that implicitly or explicitly underpin the study of international politics. I show how both notions of the rational actor and the constructivist self have remained wedded to individualist understandings of agency that were first incarnated in the discipline's self-understandings by Hobbes's natural individual. Despite its turn to social theory, this persistent individualism has hampered constructivism's ability to appraise the ways in which the actors and structures of international politics mutually constitute one another “all the way down.” My purpose is to lay the foundations for a nonindividualist, adequately relational, social theory of international politics. To this end I propose a third model of agency, Lacan's split speaking subject. Through a Lacanian reading of the Leviathan, I show how the speaking subject has in fact laid buried away in the discipline's Hobbesian legacy all along.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Terence Ball . 1985. Hobbes's Linguistic Turn. Polity 17 (4):739–60.

Michael Barnett , and Raymond Duvall. 2005. Power in International Politics. International Organization 59 (1):3975.

Jahn H. Blits 1989. Hobbesian Fear. Political Theory 17 (3):417–31.

David Boucher . 1990. Inter-Community and International Relations in the Political Philosophy of Hobbes. Polity 23 (2):207–32.

Steven J. Brams 1985. Rational Politics: Decisions, Games, and Strategy. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.

Barry Buzan . 2004. From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Edward Hallet Carr . 1946. The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.

Noam Chomsky . 1993. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. 7th ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Roxanne Lynn Doty . 2000. Desire All the Way Down. Review of International Studies 26 (1):137–39.

Mustafa Emirbayer . 1997. Manifesto for a Relational Sociology. American Journal of Sociology 103 (2):281317.

Mustafa Emirbayer , and Ann Mische. 1998. What Is Agency? American Journal of Sociology 103 (4):9621023.

Charlotte Epstein . 2008. The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Charlotte Epstein . 2011. Who Speaks? Discourse, the Subject and the Study of Identity in International Politics. European Journal of International Relations 17 (2):327–50.

Charlotte Epstein . 2012. Stop Telling Us How to Behave: Socialization or Infantilization? International Studies Perspectives 13 (2):135–45.

Jason Glynos , and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2008. Lacan and Political Subjectivity: Fantasy and Enjoyment in Psychoanalysis and Political Theory. Subjectivity 24:256–74.

Xavier Guillaume . 2009. From Process to Politics. International Political Sociology 3 (1):7186.

Mark A. Heller 1980. The Use and Abuse of Hobbes: The State of Nature in International Relations. Polity 13 (1):2132.

Patrick Thaddeus Jackson , and Daniel H. Nexon. 1999. Relations Before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics. European Journal of International Relations 5 (3):291332.

Beate Jahn . 2000. The Cultural Construction of International Relations: The Invention of the State of Nature. New York: Palgrave.

Patrick Juignet . 2003. Lacan, le Symbolique et le Signifiant. Cliniques Méditerranéennes 68:131–44.

Morton A. Kaplan 1956. How Sovereign Is Hobbes's Sovereign? Political Research Quarterly 9 (2):389405.

Gregory S. Kavka 1983. Hobbes's War of All Against All. Ethics 93 (2):291310.

Robert O. Keohane 1988. International Institutions: Two Approaches. International Studies Quarterly 32 (4):379–96.

Friedrich V. Kratochwil 1989. Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Noel Malcolm . 2002. Hobbes's Theory of International Relations. In Aspects of Hobbes, 432–56. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Iain McLean . 1981. The Social Contract in Leviathan and the Prisoner's Dilemma Supergame. Political Studies 29 (3):339–51.

Jennifer Milliken . 1999. The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations 5 (2):225–54.

Patrick Neal . 1988. Hobbes and Rational Choice Theory. Western Political Quarterly 41 (4):635–52.

Carl Schmitt . 2007 [1932]. The Concept of the Political. Translated by George Schwab. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Quentin Skinner . 1996. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Patricia Springborg . 1995. Hobbes's Biblical Beasts: Leviathan and Behemoth. Political Theory 23 (2):353–75.

Robert E. Stillman 1995. Hobbes's Leviathan: Monsters, Metaphors and Magic. English Literary History 62 (4):791819.

Hidemi Suganami . 1989. The Domestic Analogy and World Order Proposals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

John R. Vincent 1981. The Hobbesian Tradition in Twentieth-Century International Thought. Millennium—Journal of International Studies 10 (2):91101.

Alexander Wendt . 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Alexander Wendt . 2004. The State as Person in International Theory. Review of International Studies 30 (2):289316.

Colin Wight . 2006. Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Michael C. Williams 2005. The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Maja Zehfuss . 2001. Constructivism and Identity: A Dangerous Liaison. European Journal of International Relations 7 (3):315–48.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *