Skip to main content
×
×
Home

When Preferences and Commitments Collide: The Effect of Relative Partisan Shifts on International Treaty Compliance

  • Joseph M. Grieco (a1), Christopher F. Gelpi (a2) and T. Camber Warren (a3)
Abstract

In this article, we demonstrate that changes in the partisan orientation of a country's executive branch influence the likelihood that the government of that country complies with international legal commitments aimed at integration of capital markets. We argue that relative shifts in executive partisan orientation, whether toward the left or toward the right, represent important shifts in “national preferences” that have heretofore been absent from statistical models of treaty compliance. Using a matching estimator combined with a genetic algorithm to maximize balance in our sample, we show that the causal impact of a state signing Article VIII of the IMF Articles of Agreement is conditioned by right-to-left shifts in partisan orientation. The evidence indicates that such preference changes reduce the constraining effects of Article VIII but also indicates that Article VIII continues to exercise significant causal effects even in the face of relative shifts in executive partisan orientation.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Abadie, Alberto, and Imbens, Guido W.. 2007. Bias Corrected Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University and National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass. Available at ⟨http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~aabadie/bcm.pdf⟩. Accessed 14 January 2009.
Beck, Thorsten, Clarke, George, Groff, Alberto, Keefer, Philip, and Walsh, Patrick. 2001. New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions. World Bank Economic Review 15 (1):165–76.
Boix, Carles. 2000. Partisan Governments, the International Economy, and Macroeconomic Policies in Advanced Countries, 1960–93. World Politics 53 (1):3873.
Carrubba, Clifford J. 2005. Courts and Compliance in International Regulatory Regimes. Journal of Politics 67 (3):669–89.
Carter, David B., and Signorino, Curtis S.. 2007. Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary Data. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rochester, N.Y. Available at ⟨http://www.polmeth.wustl.edu/retrieve.php?id=710⟩. Accessed 14 January 2009.
Castles, Francis G., and Mair, Peter. 1984. Left-Right Political Scales: Some ‘Expert’ Judgments. European Journal of Political Research 12 (1):7388.
Chinn, Menzie D., and Ito, Hiro. 2006. What Matters for Financial Development? Capital Controls, Institutions, and Interactions. Journal of Development Economics 81 (1):163–92.
Diamond, Alexis, and Sekhon, Jasjeet S.. 2008. Genetic Matching for Estimating Causal Effects: A General Multivariate Matching Method for Achieving Balance in Observational Studies. Unpublished manuscript. Available at ⟨http://sekhon.berkeley.edu/papers/GenMatch.pdf⟩. Accessed 8 November 2008.
Downs, George W., Rocke, David M., and Barsoom, Peter N.. 1996. Is the Good News About Compliance Good News About Cooperation? International Organization 50 (3):379406.
Dutt, Pushan, and Mitra, Devashish. 2005. Political Ideology and Endogenous Trade Policy: An Empirical Investigation. Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1):5972.
Fearon, James D. 1998. Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation. International Organization 52 (2):269305.
Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gilligan, Michael J. 2004. Is There a Broader-Deeper Trade-off in International Multilateral Agreements? International Organization 58 (3):459–85.
Goodliffe, Jay, and Hawkins, Darren G.. 2006. Explaining Commitment: States and the Convention Against Torture. Journal of Politics 68 (2):358–71.
Ho, Daniel E., Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Stuart, Elizabeth A.. 2007. Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference. Political Analysis 15 (3):199236.
Honaker, James, and King, Gary. 2006. What to Do About Missing Values in Time Series Cross-Section Data. Unpublished manuscript. Available at ⟨http://gking.harvard.edu/files/abs/pr-abs.shtml⟩. Accessed 14 January 2009.
Huber, John D., and Gabel, Matthew J.. 2000. Putting Parties in Their Place: Inferring Party Left-Right Ideological Positions from Party Manifestos Data. American Journal of Political Science 44 (1):94103.
Huber, John, and Inglehart, Ronald. 1995. Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies. Party Politics 1 (1):73111.
Iversen, Torben. 1999. Contested Economic Institutions: The Politics of Macroeconomics and Wage Bargaining in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
Kahler, Miles. 2000. Conclusion: The Causes and Consequences of Legalization. International Organization 54 (3):661–83.
Kelley, Judith. 2007. Who Keeps International Commitments and Why? The International Criminal Court and Bilateral Nonsurrender Agreements. American Political Science Review 101 (3):117.
King, Gary, Honaker, James, Joseph, Anne, and Scheve, Kenneth. 2001. Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation. American Political Science Review 95 (1):4969.
King, Gary, and Zeng, Langche. 2006. The Dangers of Extreme Counterfactuals. Political Analysis 14 (2):131–59.
Koremenos, Barbara. 2001. Loosening the Ties That Bind: A Learning Model of Agreement Flexibility. International Organization 55 (2):289325.
Laver, Michael J., and Budge, Ian. 1992. Party, Policy, and Government Coalitions. London: St. Martin's.
Laver, Michael J., and Garry, John. 2000. Estimating Policy Positions from Political Texts. American Journal of Political Science 44 (3):619–34.
McGillivray, Fiona, and Smith, Alastair. 2006. Credibility in Compliance and Punishment: Leader Specific Punishments and Credibility. Journal of Politics 68 (2):248–58.
Milner, Helen V., and Judkins, Benjamin. 2004. Partisanship, Trade Policy, and Globalization: Is There a Left-Right Divide on Trade Policy? International Studies Quarterly 48 (1):95120.
Mitchell, Ronald B. 2002. A Quantitative Approach to Evaluating International Environmental Regimes. Global Environmental Politics 2 (4):5883.
Mitchell, Ronald B. 2006. Problem Structure, Institutional Design, and the Relative Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements. Global Environmental Politics 6 (3):7289.
Reinhardt, Eric. 2001. Adjudication Without Enforcement in GATT Disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (2):174–95.
Sekhon, Jasjeet S. 2007. Alternative Balance Metrics for Bias Reduction in Matching Methods for Causal Inference. Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Berkeley. Available at ⟨http://sekhon.berkeley.edu/papers/SekhonBalanceMetrics.pdf⟩. Accessed 14 January 2009.
Sekhon, Jasjeet S.Forthcoming. Matching: Multivariate and Propensity Score Matching with Automated Balance Search. Journal of Statistical Software. Computer program available at ⟨http://sekhon.berkeley.edu/matching/⟩. Accessed 14 January 2009.
Simmons, Beth A. 1994. Who Adjusts? Domestic Sources of Foreign Economic Policy During the Interwar Years. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Simmons, Beth A. 2000. International Law and State Behavior: Commitment and Compliance in International Monetary Affairs. American Political Science Review 94 (4):819–35.
Simmons, Beth A., and Hopkins, Daniel J.. 2005. The Constraining Power of International Treaties: Theory and Methods. American Political Science Review 99 (4):623–31.
Swank, Duane. 2002. Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
von Stein, Jana. 2005. Do Treaties Constrain or Screen? Selection Bias and Treaty Compliance. American Political Science Review 99 (4):611–22.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 194 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 485 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.