Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Why Ideas Matter in International Relations: Hans Morgenthau, Classical Realism, and the Moral Construction of Power Politics

  • Michael C. Williams (a1)

Debates over how ideas matter in international relations have come to occupy a key place in the field. Through a reexamination of the thinking of Hans Morgenthau, this article seeks to recover a tradition of classical realism that stressed the role of ideas in both the construction of action and in political and ethical judgment. Locating Morgenthau's understanding of politics against the background of the oppositional “concept of the political” developed by the controversial jurist Carl Schmitt shows how Morgenthau's realism attempts to recognize the centrality of power in politics without reducing politics to violence, and to preserve an open and critical sphere of public political debate. This understanding of Morgenthau's realism challenges many portrayals of his place in the evolution of international relations, and of the foundations of realist thought. However, it is also of direct relevance to current analyses of collective identity formation, linking to—and yet providing fundamental challenges for—both realist and constructivist theories.For helpful and insightful comments on this article in its wide variety of previous incarnations, I would like to thank Michael Barnett, James Der Derian, Randall Germain, Alexandra Gheciu, Stefano Guzzini, Jef Huysmans, Oliver Jutersönke, Jennifer Mitzen, Vibeke Schou Pedersen, and especially Rita Abrahamsen and Richard Wyn Jones. Previous drafts were presented at the 2002 meetings of the British International Studies Association, and at the Department of Political Science and International Studies, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. My thanks also to the participants at those sessions.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Adler, Emmanuel. 1997. Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics. European Journal of International Relations 3 (3):31963.

Amstrup, Niels. 1978. The ‘Early’ Morgenthau: A Comment on the Intellectual Origins of Realism. Cooperation and Conflict 13 (3):16375.

Ashley, Richard. 1981. Political Realism and Human Interests. International Studies Quarterly 25 (2):20436.

Ashley, Richard. 1984. The Poverty of Neorealism. International Organization 38 (2):22586.

Barkawi, Tarak. 1998. Strategy as a Vocation: Weber, Morgenthau, and Modern Strategic Studies. Review of International Studies 24 (2):15984.

Copeland, Dale. 2000. Social Theory of International Relations. International Security 25 (2):187212.

Copeland, Dale. 2003. A Realist Critique of the English School. Review of International Studies 29 (3):42741.

Desch, Michael C. 1998. Culture Clash: Assessing the Importance of Ideas in Security Studies. International Security 23 (1):14170.

Desch, Michael C. 2003. It Is Kind to Be Cruel: The Humanity of American Realism. Review of International Studies 29 (3):41526.

Deudney, Daniel. 1995. The Philadelphia System: Sovereignty, Arms Control, and Balance of Power in the American States-Union circa 1787–1861. International Organization 49 (2):191228.

Deudney, Daniel. 2000. Regrounding Realism: Anarchy, Security, and Changing Material Contexts. Security Studies 10 (1):142.

Feaver, Peter. 2000. Brother Can You Spare a Paradigm (Or, Was Anybody Ever a Realist?) International Security 25 (1):16569.

Glaser, Charles L. 2003. Structural Realism in a More Complex World. Review of International Studies 29 (3):40314.

Hobson, John M., and Leonard Seabrooke. 2001. Reimagining Weber: Constructing International Society and the Social Balance of Power. European Journal of International Relations 7 (2):23974.

Hopf, Ted. 1998. The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security 23 (1):171200.

Huysmans, Jef. 1998. The Question of the Limit: Desecuritization and the Aesthetics of Horror in Political Realism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 27 (3):56989.

Huysmans, Jef. 1999. Know Your Schmitt: A Godfather of Truth and the Spectre of Nazism. Review of International Studies 25 (2):32328.

Jacobsen, John Kurt. 2003. Duelling Constructivisms: A Post-Mortem on the Ideas Debate in IR/IPE. Review of International Studies 29 (1):3960.

Jervis, Robert. 1998. Realism in the Study of World Politics. International Organization 52 (4):97191.

Laffey, Mark, and Jutta Weldes. 1997. Beyond Belief: Ideas and Symbolic Technologies in the Study of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations 3 (2):193237.

Lebow, Richard Ned. 2001. Thucydides the Constructivist. American Political Science Review 95 (3):54760.

Legro, Jeffrey W., and Andrew Moravscik. 1999. Is Anybody Still a Realist? International Security 24 (2):555.

Little, Richard. 2003. The English School vs. American Realism: A Meeting of Minds or Divided by a Common Language? Review of International Studies 29 (3):44360.

Mearsheimer, John. 1995. A Realist Reply. International Security 20 (2):8293.

Mercer, Johnathan. 1995. Anarchy and Identity. International Organization 49 (2):22952.

Moravscik, Andrew. 1997. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization 51 (4):51353.

Petersen, Ulrik Enemark. 1999. Breathing Nietzsche's Air: New Reflections on Morgenthau's Concepts of Power and Human Nature. Alternatives 24 (1):83118.

Pichler, H. K. 1998. The Godfathers of ‘Truth’: Max Weber and Carl Schmitt in Morgenthau's Theory of Power Politics. Review of International Studies 24 (2):185200.

Price, Richard, and Christian Reus-Smit. 1998. Dangerous Liaisons?: Critical International Theory and Constructivism. European Journal of International Relations 4 (3):25994.

Risse, Thomas. 2000. “Let's Argue!”: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (1):139.

Rose, Gideon. 1998. Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics 51 (1):14472.

Rosecrance, Richard. 2001. Has Realism Become Cost-Benefit Analysis? International Security 26 (2):13254.

Sterling-Folker, Jennifer. 2002. Realism and the Constructivist Challenge: Rejecting, Reconstructing, or Rereading. International Studies Review 4 (1):7397.

Thayer, Bradley. 2000. Bringing in Darwin: Evolutionary Theory, Realism, and International Politics. International Security 25 (2):12451.

Wæver, Ole. 1998. The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations. International Organization 52 (3):687728.

Warren, Mark. 1988. Max Weber's Liberalism for a Nietzschean World. American Political Science Review 82 (2):3150.

Wendt, Alexander. 1995. Constructing International Politics. International Security 20 (1):7181.

Williams, Michael C. 2003. Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics. International Studies Quarterly 47 (4):51131.

Wolin, Richard. 1992. Carl Schmitt: The Conservative Reactionary Habitus and the Aesthetics of Horror. Political Theory 20 (3):42447.

Wong, Benjamin. 2000. Hans Morgenthau's Anti-Machiavellian Machiavellianism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29 (2):389409.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

International Organization
  • ISSN: 0020-8183
  • EISSN: 1531-5088
  • URL: /core/journals/international-organization
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 91
Total number of PDF views: 895 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2224 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.