Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:59:56.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale: Reliability and Validity in a Multicenter Clinical Trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2005

Geerd Weyer
Affiliation:
Institut für Psychologie, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
Helmut Erzigkeit
Affiliation:
Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik, Erlangen/Nürnberg, Germany
Siegried Kanowski
Affiliation:
Psychiatrische Klinik der Freien Universität, Berlin, Germany
Ralf Ihl
Affiliation:
Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik, Düsseldorf, Germany
Dietrich Hadler
Affiliation:
Takeda Europe R & D Centre GmbH, Frankfurt/Main, Germany

Abstract

Psychometric characteristics of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) were examined on the basis of data from 440 patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type that were collected before treatment in a multicenter clinical drug trial. Coefficients of internal consistency of above .80 for the cognitive (ADAS-Cog) and the noncognitive section (ADAS-Noncog) indicated a high degree of homogeneity of item contents within the two assessment domains. Test-retest reliability was estimated to be .93, .98, and .96 for ADAS-Cog, ADAS-Noncog, and the total score (ADAS-Total), respectively. Reliably detectable individual changes, which were derived from the reliability estimates, were 7,3, and 8 points for ADAS-Cog, ADAS-Noncog, and ADAS-Total, in that order. Factor analysis and correlations with MMSE, SKT, and NOSGER scores support the validity of the ADAS-Cog and ADAS-Noncog scores with regard to the cognitive and the noncognitive assessment domains. The ADAS summary scores, almost all of the cognitive items, and some of the noncognitive items discriminated significantly between stages of severity of dementia, as classified independently by MMSE and SKT scores.

Type
Studies on Measurement
Copyright
© 1997 International Psychogeriatric Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)