Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Ohlmeyer, Jane
2018.
The Cambridge History of Ireland.
Article contents
The bishops’ banishment act of 1697 (9 Will. III, c. 1)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2017
Extract
The first act of the Irish parliamentary session of 1697 provided for the banishment of all catholic clergy exercising ecclesiastical jurisdiction and also of all regular clergy. It was the first act since the treaty of Limerick that directly affected the practice of the catholic religion in Ireland, and it was something of a paradox that it should have coincided with the making of peace between William III and Louis XIV. In its early stages the bill seems to have been confined to the regular clergy, and there is some obscurity about its extension to bishops and other clerical dignitaries.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Irish Historical Studies Publications Ltd 1970
References
1 Cal. S.P. dom., 1691-2, p. 56.
2 Ibid., pp 68-9.
3 Cal. S.P dom., 1693, pp 6-7.
4 Ibid., pp 8-9.
5 Archbishop Brenan of Cashel and Bishop Phelan of Ossory.
6 Spicil. Oss., ii. 304-9.
7 Cal. S.P dom., 1693, pp 15, 141.
8 Marsh’s Library, MS Z 3. 1 4, p. 163.
9 Archiv. Hib., xxii, 168.
10 Commons’ Jn. Ire., ii, 102.
11 B.M., Add. MS 9715, f. 28.
12 Klopp, K., Der Fall des Hauses Stuart, vii, 134–7 Google Scholar
13 Coll. Hib., iv, 62.
14 Ibid., p. 73.
15 Cal. S.P dom., 1697 p. 250.
16 Lords’ jn. Ire., i, 599-600.
17 Cal. S.P dom., 1697, pp 283-4. The bill seems to have been extensively redrafted. Apart from its extension to church dignitaries, the new title omitted the reference to the suppression of friaries etc., and the act made no substantive provision for such suppression, though there are two consequential references, one to burial in a suppressed monastery and the other to the powers of magistrates to issue warrants for suppression.
18 Vernon to Shrewsbury, 7 Sept. 1697, ( James, G. P R., Letters illustrative of the reign of William III, i, 345–6)Google Scholar.
19 Hoffmann’s report of 20/30 July 1697, cited in Klopp, vii, 470.
20 Cal. S.P dom., 1697, pp 197-8.
21 Coll. Hib., iv, 56-7.
22 Moran, , Spicil. Ossor., ii, 325 Google Scholar.
23 Ibid., ii, 322; Coll. Hib., iv, 60.
24 Lords’ jn. Ire., i, 616, 620, 638; Commons’ jn. Ire., ii, 193. The dates are old style.
25 Lords’ jn. Ire., i, 633-7.
26 Coll. Hib., iv, 61
27 Coll. Hib., iv, 59-60.
28 Moran, , Spicil. Ossor., ii, 322–3 Google Scholar. The act makes no reference to seminary priests. It is not clear how the ninth article (which provided that the only oath to be taken by catholics should be the oath of allegiance) was involved.
29 Klopp, vii, 471-2, 512.
30 Klopp, vii, 472-4.
31 Beilesheim, A., Geschichte der katholischen Kirche in Irland, iii, 23–4 Google Scholar.
32 Grimblot, P., Letters of William III and Louis XIV, i, 130 Google Scholar.
33 Coll, , Hib., iv, 62 Google Scholar.
34 H.M.C., Buccleuch MSS, ii, 485 Google Scholar.
35 Cal. S.P dom., 1697, p. 314.
36 Burke, W P., Irish priests in penal times, pp 120–8 Google Scholar; 9 Will. III, c. 8, sect. 4. The figures are taken from Society, Royal, Phil, transactions, xxii, 521–2 Google Scholar, which give area figures as well as totals. Burke’s figure for seculars is 892, which is also given by Renehan, L. F, Collections on Irish church history, i, 84 Google Scholar.
37 Marsh’s Library, MS Z 3, 1, 19 (1).
38 Royal Soc. Phil, trans., xxii, 522. Burke, p. 132, quotes this source, but appears to have made a mistake in giving 190 as the Galway figure, he gives 424 as the total transported, p. 144. Renehan, p. 84, also gives 190 for the Galway figure.
39 Burke, p. 132.
40 Wall, M., Penal laws, pp 13–14 Google Scholar.
41 Moran, , Spicil. Ossor., ii, 345–6 Google Scholar.
42 Wall, p. 15.
43 Dunton, John, Conversation in Ireland, pp 556–7.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by