Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Is There Ever a ‘Right to One's Own Law’? An Exploration of Possible Rights Foundations for Legal Pluralism

  • Frédéric Mégret (a1)

This article explores the possibility of elaborating a strong rights foundation for ‘weak’ legal pluralist arrangements, consisting of the recognition by the state of a degree of autonomy for the legal practices of minorities. It finds unhelpful and reductionist those arguments based merely on whether certain aspects of minority law are in violation of human rights or are more effective at protecting rights than state law. Instead, the article seeks to tackle the central issue of whether there is more generally a human rights case for legal pluralism, despite the modern rights movement's strong historical association with state monism and egalitarian universalism. Traditional rights bases for minority protection, both group and individual based, are envisaged specifically from the point of view of recognition of minority legal traditions. Both are found to raise difficulties that are magnified by the entry into play of legal considerations. When it comes to collective rights, there is a fear that endowing certain communities with legal autonomy will increase their ability to oppress the minority within; when it comes to individual rights, the idea of a ‘right to one's law’ misses the degree to which law is an institutional construct which requires a new division of power within the state that goes far beyond what are generally understood as basic freedoms. Rather than assessing the problem merely from an individual or group point of view, the rights validity of legal pluralist arrangements is seen as dependent on how they relate to society at large. Specifically, a case is made that legal pluralism can be part of a beneficial coming to terms by societies with their diversity, a reinforcement of democratic forms and, in some cases, a type of transitional justice that recognises the extent to which the deprivation of law has been a traditional means of subjugation of minorities. The article concludes with an effort to recast the entire debate from the point of view of international human rights law and to critique its somewhat arbitrary focus on the state as the only locus of significant legal diversity.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Donna Lee Van Cott , ‘A Political Analysis of Legal Pluralism in Bolivia and Colombia’ (2000) 32 Journal of Latin American Studies 207–34

Sally Engle Merry , ‘Legal Pluralism’ (1988) 22 Law and Society Review 869

Rachel Sieder , Multiculturalism in Latin America: Indigenous Rights, Diversity, and Democracy (Palgrave Macmillan2002)

David Pimentel , ‘Rule of Law Reform without Cultural Imperialism: Reinforcing Customary Justice through Collateral Review in Southern Sudan’ (2010) 2 Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 1

Aida Hernandez Castillo , ‘National Law and Indigenous Customary Law: The Struggle for Justice of Indigenous Women in Chiapas, Mexico’ in Maxine Molyneux and Shahrashoub Razavi (eds), Gender Justice, Development, and Rights (OUP2002)

James Tully , ‘The Crisis of Identification: The Case of Canada’ (1994) 42 Political Studies 77

Ruth Gay , Safe Among the Germans: Liberated Jews after World War II (Yale University Press2002) 21

Frédéric Mégret , ‘The Disabilities Convention: Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities or Disability Rights?’ (2008) 30 Human Rights Quarterly 494

Yael Tamir , ‘Against Collective Rights’ (1999) 1 Multicultural Questions 158

Peter Jones , ‘Human Rights, Group Rights, and Peoples’ Rights' (1999) 21 Human Rights Quarterly 80

Patrick Macklem , ‘Minority Rights in International Law’ (2008) 6 International Journal of Constitutional Law 531, 533

Andreas Wimmer and Conrad Schetter , ‘Putting State Formation First: Some Recommendations for Reconstruction and Peace-making in Afghanistan’ (2003) 15 Journal of International Development 525, 536

Rachel Sieder , ‘Rethinking Democratisation and Citizenship: Legal Pluralism and Institutional Reform in Guatemala’ (1999) 3 Citizenship Studies 103, 112

Dolores A Donovan and Getachew Assefa , ‘Homicide in Ethiopia: Human Rights, Federalism, and Legal Pluralism’ (2003) 51 American Journal of Comparative Law 505, 507

Ihsan Yilmaz , ‘The Challenge of Post-Modern Legality and Muslim Legal Pluralism in England’ (2002) 28 Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 343

Lynn Khadiagala , ‘The Failure of Popular Justice in Uganda: Local Councils and Women's Property Rights’ (2001) 32 Development and Change 55

Patrick Macklem , ‘Militant Democracy, Legal Pluralism, and the Paradox of Self-Determination’ (2006) 4 International Journal of Constitutional Law 488

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Israel Law Review
  • ISSN: 0021-2237
  • EISSN: 2047-9336
  • URL: /core/journals/israel-law-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 9 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 61 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.