Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The discursive use of the concept of ‘corruption’ in parliamentary debates during the Portuguese Estado Novo (1935–74)

  • Luís De Sousa (a1) and Marcelo Moriconi (a2)

Corruption is deviant behaviour from legal and social norms, observable in both dictatorships and democracies, and salient in different periods of the history of mankind. Studying corruption in dictatorships is particularly challenging due to the fact that freedom of expression is censored and there is little (if any) reliable information about the enforcement of legal provisions. This article provides a contribution to the growing literature on the role of legislatures in dictatorships by focusing on parliamentary debates on corruption as a discourse control mechanism. The case of the Portuguese legislature during the Estado Novo is paradigmatic in that regard. The National Assembly, as it will be demonstrated in this article, was able to shift the debate on corruption from the legal to the moral dimension and, thus, deprive citizens, and in particular the opposition, of objective standards to hold regime elites accountable for their misconduct.

Corresponding author
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

L. De Sousa (2008), ‘“I Don’t Bribe, I Just Pull Strings”: assessing the fluidity of social representations of corruption in Portuguese society’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society 9(1): 823.

R. Entman (1993), ‘Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm’, Journal of Communication 43(4): 5158.

C.J. Friedrich (1966), ‘Political pathology’, Political Quarterly 37: 7085.

J. Gandhi (2008), Political Institutions Under Dictatorships, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

H. Tumbler and S. Waisbord (2004), ‘Political scandals and media across democracies: introduction’, American Behavioral Scientist 47(7–8): 10311039.

M. Johnston (1996), ‘The search for definitions: the vitality of politics and the issue of corruption’, International Social Science Journal 48(3): 321335.

B. Magaloni (2006), Voting for autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

J. Gandhi and Przeworski A. (2006), ‘Cooperation, cooptation, and rebellion under dictatorships’, Economics & Politics 18(1): 126.

A.C. Pinto (2011), ‘Ruling elites, political institutions and decision-making in fascist-era dictatorships: comparative perspectives’, in A.C. Pinto (ed.), Rethinking the Nature of Fascism: Comparative Perspectives, Basingstoke/NY: Palgrave/Macmillan, pp. 197226.

E. Lust-Okar (2006), ‘Elections under authoritarianism: Preliminary lessons from Jor- dan’, Democratization 13(3): 456471.

P.C. Schmitter (1977), ‘Portée et signification des élections dans le Portugal autoritaire (1933–1974)’, Revue Française de Science Politique 27(1): 92122. Retrieved from

H. Semetko and P. Valkenburg (2000), ‘Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news’, Journal of Communication 50(2): 93109.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica
  • ISSN: 0048-8402
  • EISSN: 2057-4908
  • URL: /core/journals/italian-political-science-review-rivista-italiana-di-scienza-politica
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

De Sousa and Moriconi Dataset



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 8 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 93 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.