Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T02:10:58.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Erasing the Corporate Sovereign Inter-Textuality and an Alternative Explanation for the Publication of Hugo Grotius' Mare Liberum (1609)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2010

Extract

There is no generally accepted explanation as to why Mare Liberum, or The Free Sea, was written. The most common view is that the Text was a propaganda instrument designed to improve the position of the United Provinces during the truce negotiations with Spain from 1606–08. Central to Grotius' strategy was his reliance upon Iberian Scholastics as a means of providing a series of irrefutable propositions to the Spaniards.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Research Institute for History, Leiden University 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Cited Works

Aquinas, Thomas, Summa Theologiae. Volume 38: Injustice (2a2ae. 63–79) (New York, 1975).Google Scholar
Gentili, Alberico, De lure Belli Libri Tres (New York, 1964).Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, De lure Praedae Commentarius. Commentary on the Law of Prize and Booty [DeIndis] (London, 1964).Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, ‘‘Defense of Chapter V of the Mare Liberum’, in Grotius, Free Sea (Indianapolis,2004), 77130.Google Scholar
Vitoria, Francisco de, ‘De lure Gentium et Naturalis on St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica, Secunda Secundae, Question 57, Article 3’, in Scott, James Brown, The Spanish Origins of International Law: Francis de Vitoria and His Law of Nations (Oxford, 1934), cxi-cxxxi.Google Scholar
Vitoria, Francisco de, ‘Lecture on the Evangelization of Unbelievers’, in Vitoria, Francisco de, Vitoria, Francisco de: Political Writings (Cambridge, 1991), 341351.Google Scholar
Vitoria, Francisco de, ‘On the American Indians’ [De Indis], in Vitoria, Francisco de, Francisco de Vitoria: Political Writings (Cambridge, 1991), 231292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitoria, Francisco de, ‘On the Law of War’ [De lure Belli], in Vitoria, Francisco de, Francisco de Vitoria: Political Writings (Cambridge, 1991), 293327Google Scholar
Berman, Harold J., Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition (Cambridge, Mass., 1983).Google Scholar
Black, Antony, Council and Commune: The Conciliar Movement and the Fifteenth-Century Heritage (London, 1979).Google Scholar
Boxer, C.H., The Dutch Seaborne Empire 1600–1800 (Harmondsworth, 1965).Google Scholar
Burch, Karl, ‘Property’ and the Making of the International System (London, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, J.H., Lordship, Kingship, and Empire: The Idea of Monarchy, 1400–1525 (Oxford, 1992).Google Scholar
Pauw, Frans De, Grotius and the Law of the Sea (Brussels, 1965).Google Scholar
Den Tex, Jan, Oldenbarneuelt II (Cambridge, 1973).Google Scholar
Fernandez-Santamaria, J.A., The State, War and Peace: Spanish Political Thought in the Renaissance 1516–1559 (Cambridge, 1995).Google Scholar
Figgis, John Neville, Political Thought from Gerson to Grotius, 1414–1625: Seven Studies (New York, 1960).Google Scholar
Fulton, Thomas Wemyss, The Sovereigntyof the Sea (London, 1911).Google Scholar
Grewe, Wilhelm G., The Epochs of International Law (New York, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, Marjolein‘t, The Making of the Bourgeois State: War, Politics and Finance During the Dutch Revolt (Manchester, 1993).Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan I., The Dutch Republic and the Hispanic World 1606–1661 (Oxford, 1982).Google Scholar
Israel, JonathanThe Dutch Republic: Its Rise, Greatness and Fall 1477–1806 (Oxford, 1998).Google Scholar
Keen, Maurice, The Laws of War in the Later Middle Ages (London, 1965).Google Scholar
Keene, Edward, Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics (Cambridge, 2002).Google Scholar
Knight, William S.M., The Life and Works of Hugo Grotius (London, 1925).Google Scholar
Oudendijk, J.K., Status and Extent of Adjacent Waters: A Historical Orientation (Leiden, 1970).Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin, The Foundations of Modern Political Thought II (Cambridge, 1978).Google Scholar
Thomas, J.A.C., Textbook of Roman Law (Dordrecht, 1979).Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian, Church Law and Constitutional Thought in the Middle Ages (London 1979).Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian, Foundations of the Conciliar Theory: The Contribution of the Medieval Canonists from Gratian to the Great Schism (Cambridge, 1955).Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard R., Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development (Cambridge, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, Brian, Philosophy and Government 1572–1651 (Cambridge, 1993).Google Scholar
Ullman, Walter, Medieval Political Thought (Harmondsworth, 1975);Google Scholar
Gelderen, Martin van, The Political Thought of the Dutch Revolt 1555–1590 (Cambridge, 1985).Google Scholar
Verzijl, J.H.W., International Law in Historical Perspective. Part IX-C. The Law of the Maritime Prize (Dordrecht, 1992).Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel, The Modern World-System 1: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century (New York, 1974).Google Scholar
Wilks, Michael, The Problem of Sovereignty in the Middle Ages: The Papal Monarchy with Augustinus Triumpus and the Publicists (Cambridge, 1963).Google Scholar
Ashley, Robert K., ‘Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique’, Millenium 17 (1988), 227262.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan, ‘The Just War, in Kretzmann, Norman et al., eds, The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy: From the Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism 1100–1600 (Cambridge, 1982), 771784.Google Scholar
Black, Antony, ‘The Conciliar Movement’, in Burns, J.H., ed., The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c. 350 - c. 1450 (Cambridge, 1988), 578587.Google Scholar
Black, Antony, ‘What Was Conciliarism?: Conciliar Theory in Historical Perspective, in Tierney, Brian and Linehan, Peter, eds, Authority and Power (Cambridge, 1980), 213224.Google Scholar
Borschberg, Peter, ‘Critical Introduction, in Hugo Grotius, Commentarius in Theses XI. An Early Treatise on Sovereignty, the Just War, and the Legitimacy of the Dutch Revolt (New York, 1994), 15199 (sic).Google Scholar
Black, Antony, ‘Hugo Grotius Theory’’ of Trans-Oceanic Trade Regulation: Revisiting Mare Liberum (1609)’, Itinerario 29/3 (2005), 3153.Google Scholar
Canning, J.P., ‘Law, Sovereignty and Corporation Theory, 1300–1450’, in Burns, Cambridge History, 454476.Google Scholar
Haggenmacher, Peter, ‘Grotius and Gentili: A Reassessment of Thomas E. Holland' Inaugural Lecture’, in et, Hedley Bull al., eds, Hugo Grotius and International Relations (Oxford, 1990),133176.Google Scholar
Kingdon, Robert M., ‘Calvinism and Resistance Theory, 1550–1580’, in Burns, J.H. and Goldie, Mark, eds, The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700 (Cambridge, 2001), 193218.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, ‘Confronting Difference: The Puzzling Durability of Gentili' Combination of Pluralism and Normative Judgement’, The American Journal of International Law 92 (1998), 713723.Google Scholar
Klein, P.W., ‘The Origins of Trading Companies’, in Blusse, L. and Gaastra, F.S., eds, Companies and Trade (Leiden, 1981), 1728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luscombe, D.E., ‘Natural Morality and Natural Law’, in Kretzmann, Cambridge History, 705720.Google Scholar
Luscombe, D.E., ‘The State of Nature and the Origin of the State’, in Kretzmann, Cambridge History, 757770.Google Scholar
Maitland, F.W., ‘Translator' Introduction’, in Otto Gierke, Political Theories of the Middle Ages(Cambridge, 1900), vii–xlv.Google Scholar
McGrade, Arthur Stephan, ‘Rights, Natural Rights, and the Philosophy of Law, in Kretzmann, Cambridge History, 738756.Google Scholar
Pagden, Anthony, ‘The Preservation of Order: The School of Salamanca and the ‘Ius Naturae’, in et, F.W. Hodcroft al., eds, Medieval and Renaissance Studies on Spain and Portugal in Honour of P.E. Russell (Oxford, 1991), 155166.Google Scholar
Phillipson, Coleman, ‘Introduction’, in Alberico Gentili, De lure Belli Libri Tres (New York, 1964),951.Google Scholar
Quillet, Jean, ‘Community, Counsel and Representation’, in Burns, Cambridge History, 520572.Google Scholar
Roelofsen, Cornelius, ‘Grotius and the International Politics of the Seventeenth Century’, in et, Hedley Bull al., eds, Hugo Grotius and International Relations (Oxford, 1990), 95131.Google Scholar
Simmonds, Kenneth R., ‘Alberico Gentili at the Admiralty Bar’, in Dunn, John and Harris, Ian, eds, Grotius, I (Cheltenham, 1997), 472487.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri, ‘Translator' Preface’, in Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology (Baltimore, 1976), ix–lxxxvii.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian, ‘Origins of Natural Rights Language: Texts and Contexts, 1150–1250’, History of Political Thought 10 (1989), 615646.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian, ‘Tuck on Rights: Some Medieval Problems’, History of Political Thought 4 (1983), 429441.Google Scholar
Tierney, Brian, ‘Villey, Ockham and the Origins of Individual Rights’, in Witte, J. and Alexander, F.S., eds, The Weightier Matters of the Law: Essays on Law and Religion (Atlanta, 1988), 131.Google Scholar
Molen, G.H.J. van der, ‘Alberico Gentili and the Universality of International Law’, The Indian Yearbook of International Affairs 13 (1964), 3346.Google Scholar
Gelderen, Martin van, ‘From Domingo de Soto to Hugo Grotius: Theories of Monarchy and Civil Power in Spanish and Dutch Political Thought, 1555–1609’, II Pension Politico. Reuista di Storia delle Idee Politice e Sociali 32 (1999), 185205.Google Scholar
Yanagihara, Masahara, ‘Dominium and Imperium, in Onuma, Y., ed., A normative Approach to War: Peace, War, and Justice in Hugo Grotius (Oxford, 1993).Google Scholar
Wilson, Eric, ‘The Savage Republic: De Indis of Hugo Grotius, Primitive Legal Scholarship, and Dutch Hegemony in the Early Capitalist World Economy (c. 1603–1608)’ (Unpublished SJD thesis; University of Melbourne, 2005).Google Scholar