No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Waste in Advertising Is the Part That Works
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 April 2005
Abstract
This study shows that “waste”—the perceived extravagance of an advertisement—contributes to advertising effectiveness by increasing credibility. It draws especially on the “Handicap Principle” in biology: animals use wasteful characteristics to signal their exceptional biological fitness. It hypothesizes that excesses in advertising work in a similar way by signaling “brand fitness.” TV advertisements were evaluated online for perceived advertising expense, message, brand familiarity, quality, reliability, and likelihood of choosing. High perceived advertising expense enhances an advertisement's persuasiveness significantly, but largely indirectly, by strengthening perceptions of brand quality.
- Type
- INSIGHTS INTO MARKETING COMMUNICATION AT LARGE
- Information
- Copyright
- © Copyright © 1960-2004, The ARF
References
REFERENCES
Advertising Statistics Yearbook.
Henley on Thames, U.K.:
World Advertising Research Council,
2001.
Ambler, Tim, and
Scott Goldstein.
Pre-testing: Practice and Best Practice.
London:
Advertising Association,
April 2003.
Bonate, Peter L.
Analysis of Pretest-Posttest Designs.
Boca Raton, FL:
Chapman and Hall/CRC,
2000.
Broadbent, Tim.
“Pre-testing Methods—The Agony of Choice.”
Admap
377,
(October 1997):
11–15.Google Scholar
Cook, William A., and
Theodore F. Dunn.
“The Changing Face of Advertising Research in the Information
Age: An ARF Copy Research Council Survey.”
Journal of Advertising Research
36, 1
(1996):
55–71.Google Scholar
Davis, Evan,
John Kay, and
Jonathan Star.
“Is Advertising Rational?”
Business Strategy Review
2, 3
(1991):
1–23.Google Scholar
Gale, Bradley T.
Managing Customer Value.
New York:
The Free Press,
1994.
Gollins, Jan.
“Discover Why Ads Work.”
Proceedings of the Advertising Research Foundation 47th National
Conference,
New York,
2001.
Hollier, E. Ann, and
Kristen C. Remington.
“Advertising Research in the 21st Century: A New Method for
the Internet Age.”
ESOMAR International Conference on Marketing in Latin America,
Mexico City, Mexico,
2001.
Kirmani, Amna.
“The Effect of Perceived Advertising Costs on Brand
Perceptions.”
Journal of Consumer Research
17, 2
(1990):
160–71.Google Scholar
Kirmani, Amna.
“Advertising Repetition as a Signal of Quality: If It's
Advertised So Much, Something Must Be Wrong.”
Journal of Advertising
26, 3
(1997):
77–86.Google Scholar
Kirmani, Amna, and
Peter Wright.
“Money Talks: Perceived Advertising Expense and Expected
Product Quality.”
Journal of Consumer Research
16, 3
(1989):
344–53.Google Scholar
McDonald, Colin.
Pre-Testing Advertisements.
Admap Monograph. Henley-on-Thames, U.K.:
NTC Publications,
1997.
Marketing Leadership Council.
Report on Membership Survey into Marketing Effectiveness and
Measurement.
Washington, DC:
Marketing Leadership Council,
2001.
Milgrom, Paul, and
John Roberts.
“Price and Advertising Signals of Product
Quality.”
Journal of Political Economy
94, 4
(1986):
796–821.Google Scholar
Nelson, Phillip.
“Information and Consumer Behavior.”
Journal of Political Economy
78, 2
(1970):
311–29.Google Scholar
Nelson, Phillip.
“Advertising as Information.”
Journal of Political Economy
82, 4
(1974):
729–54.Google Scholar
Scipione, Paul.
“Too Much or Too Little? Public Perceptions of Advertising
Expenditures.”
Journal of Advertising Research
37, 3
(1997):
49–58.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein.
The Theory of the Leisure Class.
New York:
Macmillan.
Page references are to the 1994 London: Penguin edition,
1899.
Zahavi, Amotz.
“Mate Selection: A Selection for a Handicap.”
Journal of Theoretical Biology
53
(1975):
205–14.Google Scholar
Zahavi, Amotz, and
Avishag Zahavi.
The Handicap Principle. A Missing Piece of Darwin's
Puzzle.
Oxford:
OUP,
1997.