Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

THE MISSING PEOPLE: ACCOUNTING FOR THE PRODUCTIVITY OF INDIGENOUS POPULATIONS IN CAPE COLONIAL HISTORY*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2015


JOHAN FOURIE
Affiliation:
Stellenbosch University
ERIK GREEN
Affiliation:
Lund University

Abstract

Because information about the livelihoods of indigenous groups in Africa is often missing from colonial records, the presence of such people usually escapes attention in quantitative estimates of colonial economic activity. This is nowhere more apparent than in the eighteenth-century Dutch Cape Colony, where the role of the Khoesan in Cape production, despite being frequently acknowledged, has been almost completely ignored in quantitative investigations. Combining household-level settler data with anecdotal accounts of Khoesan labour, this article presents new estimates of the Khoesan population of the Cape Colony. Our results show that the Khoesan did not leave the area as a consequence of settler expansion. On the contrary, the number of Khoesan employed by the settlers increased over time, as the growth of settler farming followed a pattern of primitive accumulation and drove the Khoesan to abandon their pastoral lifestyle to become farm labourers. We show that, in failing to include the Khoesan population, previous estimates have overestimated slave productivity, social inequality, and the level of gross domestic product in the Cape Colony.


Type
New Economic Histories
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

*

We thank Anton Ehlers, Di Kilpert, Robert Ross, Jan Luiten van Zanden, Dieter von Fintel, Nigel Worden, seminar participants at Stellenbosch University and Lund University, the staff of the Cape Town Archives Repository, and four anonymous referees of this journal for helpful suggestions on earlier versions of this article. We are grateful to Economic Research Southern Africa (ERSA) for financial support and for publishing an earlier version of this article as Working Paper No. 425, and for a research grant from the Southern African-Nordic Centre (SANORD). Authors' email: johanf@sun.ac.za; Erik.Green@ekh.lu.se


References

1 Nunn, N., ‘The long-term effects of Africa's slave trades’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123:1 (2008), 139–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Michalopoulos, S. and Papaioannou, E., ‘Pre-colonial ethnic institutions and contemporary African development’, Econometrica, 81:1 (2013), 113–52Google ScholarPubMed; Austin, G. and Broadberry, S., ‘Introduction: the renaissance of African economic history’, Economic History Review, 67:4 (2014), 893906CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Hopkins, A., ‘The new economic history of Africa’, The Journal of African History, 50:2 (2009), 155–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fenske, J., ‘The causal history of Africa: replies to Jerven and Hopkins’, Economic History of Developing Regions, 26:2 (2011), 125–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jerven, M., ‘A clash of disciplines? Economists and historians approaching the African past’, Economic History of Developing Regions, 26:2 (2011), 111–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Frankema, E., ‘Colonial taxation and government spending in British Africa, 1880–1940: maximizing revenue or minimizing effort?’, Explorations in Economic History, 48:1 (2011), 136–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Frankema, E. and van Waijenburg, M., ‘Structural impediments to African growth? New evidence from real wages in British Africa, 1880–1965’, Journal of Economic History, 72:4 (2012), 895926CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gardner, L., ‘Decentralization and corruption in historical perspective: evidence from tax collection in British colonial Africa’, Economic History of Developing Regions, 25:2 (2010), 213–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jerven, M., ‘African growth recurring: an economic history perspective on African growth episodes, 1690–2010’, Economic History of Developing Regions, 25:2 (2010), 127–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Frankema, E. and Jerven, M., ‘Writing history backwards or sideways: towards a consensus on African population, 1850–2010’, Economic History Review, 67:4 (2014), 907–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Huillery, E., ‘The impact of European settlement within French West Africa: did pre-colonial prosperous areas fall behind?’, Journal of African Economies, 20:2 (2011), 263311CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Austin, G., Baten, J., and van Leeuwen, B., ‘The biological standard of living in early nineteenth-century West Africa: new anthropometric evidence for northern Ghana and Burkina Faso’, Economic History Review, 65:4 (2012), 1280–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cogneau, D. and Rouanet, L., ‘Living conditions in Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana, 1925–1985: what do survey data on height stature tell us?’, Economic History of Developing Regions, 26:2 (2011), 5582CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Moradi, A., ‘Towards an objective account of nutrition and health in colonial Kenya: a study of stature in African army recruits and civilians, 1880–1980’, Journal of Economic History, 69:3 (2009), 719–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fenske, J., ‘Land abundance and economic institutions: Egba land and slavery, 1830–1914’, Economic History Review, 65:2 (2012), 527–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar; P. Osafo-Kwaako, ‘Long-run effects of villagization in Tanzania’ (unpublished working paper, Harvard University, 2011).

7 du Plessis, S. and du Plessis, S., ‘Happy in the service of the Company: the purchasing power of VOC salaries at the Cape in the 18th century’, Economic History of Developing Regions, 27:1 (2012), 125–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fourie, J., ‘The remarkable wealth of the Dutch Cape Colony: measurements from eighteenth-century probate inventories’, Economic History Review, 66:2 (2013), 419–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fourie, J. and von Fintel, D., ‘The dynamics of inequality in a newly settled, pre-industrial society’, Cliometrica, 4:3 (2010), 229–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Baten, J. and Blum, M., ‘Growing tall but unequal: new findings and new background evidence on anthropometric welfare in 156 countries, 1810–1989’, Economic History of Developing Regions, 27:S1 (2012), S66–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Steckel, R., ‘Stature and the standard of living’, Journal of Economic Literature, 33:4 (1995), 1903–40Google Scholar.

9 Doyle, S., ‘Population decline and delayed recovery in Bunyoro, 1860–1960’, The Journal of African History, 41:3 (2000), 429–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Meier zu Selhausen, F., ‘Missionaries and female empowerment in colonial Uganda: new evidence from Protestant marriage registers, 1880–1945’, Economic History of Developing Regions, 29:1 (2014), 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Moradi, ‘Towards an objective account’; H. Bodenhorn, T. Guinnane, and T. Mroz, ‘Problems of sample-selection bias in the historical heights literature: a theoretical and econometric analysis' (working paper No. 1023, Yale University, 2013). The latter authors offer an example of how selectivity may prevent a sample from being representative of a population: if non-army incomes rise faster for taller individuals, individuals' decisions about whether to join the army can create an illusory puzzle of declining army heights despite rising incomes even though there has been no decline in the heights of the population.

12 See, for example, Dell, M., ‘The persistent effects of Peru's mining mita’, Econometrica, 78:6 (2010), 1863–903Google Scholar; Bruhn, M. and Gallego, F. A., ‘Good, bad, and ugly colonial activities: do they matter for economic development?’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 94:2 (2012), 433–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 The title of the popular transdisciplinary book by Jared Diamond (New York, 1997). See Wolf, E., Europe and the People without History (Berkeley, 1982)Google Scholar, 58ff.

14 Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Robinson, J., ‘The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation’, American Economic Review, 91:5 (2001), 1369–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Fourie, J., ‘The quantitative Cape: a review of the new historiography of the Dutch Cape Colony’, South African Historical Journal, 66:1 (2014), 142–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar, provides a comprehensive overview of this early literature.

16 A comprehensive discussion can be found in Elphick, R., Kraal and Castle: Khoikhoi and the Founding of White South Africa (New Haven, 1977)Google Scholar.

17 Marks, S., ‘Khoisan resistance to the Dutch in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries’, The Journal of African History, 13:1 (1972), 5580CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Fourie, J. and von Fintel, D., ‘Settler skills and colonial development: the Huguenot wine-makers in eighteenth-century Dutch South Africa’, Economic History Review, 67:4 (2014), 932963CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Shell, R., Children of Bondage: A Social History of the Slave Society at the Cape of Good Hope, 1652–1838 (Hanover, 1994)Google Scholar; Worden, N., Slavery in Dutch South Africa (Cambridge, UK, 1985)Google Scholar.

20 Green, E., ‘The economics of slavery in the eighteenth-century Cape Colony: revising the Nieboer-Domar hypothesis’, International Review of Social History, 59:1 (2014), 3970CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 Armstrong, J. and Worden, N., ‘The slaves, 1652–1834’, in Elphick, R. and Giliomee, H. (eds.), The Shaping of South African Society, 1652–1840 (Middletown, Connecticut, 1988), pp. 109–83Google Scholar; Newton-King, S., Masters and Servants on the Cape Eastern Frontier, 1760–1803 (Cambridge, UK, 1999)Google Scholar.

22 Worden, Slavery in Dutch South Africa, 82.

23 Penn, N., ‘Labour, land and livestock in the Western Cape during the eighteenth century: the Khoisan and the colonists’, in Wilmot, J. G. and Simons, M. (eds.), The Angry Divide: Social and Economic History of the Western Cape (Cape Town, 1989), 219Google Scholar.

24 Guelke, L. and Shell, R., ‘An early colonial landed gentry: land and wealth in the Cape Colony, 1682–1731’, Journal of Historical Geography, 9:3 (1983), 265–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Elphick, R. and Malherbe, V. C., ‘The Khoisan to 1828’, in Elphick, R. and Giliomee, H. (eds.), The Shaping of South African Society, 1652–1840 (Cape Town, 1989), 17Google Scholar.

26 Shell, Children of Bondage, 27.

27 Worden, Slavery in Dutch South Africa, 33–6.

28 Ibid. 36.

Ibid

29 Ibid. 35.

Ibid

30 H. J. le Roux, ‘Die toestand, verspreiding en verbrokkeling van die Hottentotstamme in Suid-Afrika, 1652–1713’ (unpublished master's thesis, University of Stellenbosch, 1945); Elphick and Malherbe, ‘The Khoisan’; Nigel Penn, The Forgotten Frontier: Colonist and Khoisan on the Cape's Northern Frontier in the 18th Century (Lansdowne, Cape Town, 2005)Google Scholar; Elphick, Kraal and Castle; Marks, ‘Khoisan resistance’.

31 Elphick, Kraal and Castle.

32 Ibid. 3–4. This is similar to estimates by earlier historians, notably Theal and Le Roux, of between 40,000 and 50,000 Khoesan; see McCall Theal, G., History of Africa South of the Zambesi: From the Settlement of the Portuguese at Sofala in September 1505 to the Conquest of the Cape Colony by the British in September 1795 (London, 1927), 126Google Scholar; Le Roux, ‘Die toestand’, 5.

Ibid

33 L. Guelke, ‘The early European settlement of South Africa’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Toronto, 1974).

34 Fourie, J. and van Zanden, J. L., ‘GDP in the Dutch Cape Colony: the national accounts of a slave-based society’, South African Journal of Economics, 81:4 (2013), 467–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

35 Heese, H., Reg en Onreg: Kaapse Regspraak in die Agtiende Eeu (Bellville, Cape Town, 1994)Google Scholar; J. Baten and J. Fourie, ‘Numeracy of Africans, Asians and Europeans during the early modern period: evidence from Cape Colony court registers’, Economic History Review, in press.

36 Ross, R., ‘Smallpox and the Cape of Good Hope in the eighteenth century’, in Fyvie, C. and McMasters, D. (eds.), Africa Historical Demography, Volume I (Centre for African Studies, University of Edinburgh, 1977), 416–28Google Scholar. Since no data are available, Robert Ross derives his figure by combining an in-depth understanding of the epidemiology of smallpox with an empirically detailed analysis of its effect on white settlers and slaves.

37 A full description of the data is available in Fourie and von Fintel, ‘The dynamics of inequality’.

38 Viljoen, R., Jan Paerl, a Khoikhoi in Cape Colonial Society, 1761–1851 (Leiden, 2006), 39Google Scholar.

39 B. Liebenberg, ‘Die Kaapse Hottentotte (1795–1806)’ (unpublished Master's thesis, University of Stellenbosch, 1941), 104 (authors' translation).

40 Shell, Children of Bondage, 24.

41 Viljoen, Jan Paerl.

42 Een Generale Beschrijving van de Colonie de Kaap de Goede Hoop [A general description of the Colony of the Cape of Good Hope], Part I, VC 104, Cape Town Archives Repository. Unfortunately the author's name is missing.

43 Worden, Slavery in Dutch South Africa, 35.

44 J294, J296, J298, J300, J302, J305, J306, J311, Cape Town Archives Repository.

45 Because new districts were promulgated after the arrival of British administration in 1806, the Stellenbosch district in the 1830s was much smaller than in the eighteenth century.

46 Green, ‘The economics of slavery’.

47 Worden, Slavery in Dutch South Africa, 66–7. One mud is approximately 1 hectolitre.

48 Ibid. 67.

Ibid

49 Ibid. 65.

Ibid

50 Ibid.

Ibid

51 Ibid. 68.

Ibid

52 Ibid. 67.

Ibid

53 Ibid. 65–7.

Ibid

54 Ibid.

Ibid

55 Ibid. 67. One leaguer is approximately 582 litres.

Ibid

56 Ibid.

Ibid

57 Ibid. 83.

Ibid

58 Green, ‘The economics of slavery’; J. Fourie, ‘Slaves as capital investment in the Dutch Cape Colony’, in Hillbom, E. and Svensson, P., Agricultural Transformation in a Global History Perspective (London, 2013), 136–59Google Scholar.

59 Barrow, J., Travels into the Interior of Southern Africa, Volumes I and II (2nd edn, Cadell, T. and Davies, W., London, 1806)Google Scholar, Volume II, 92.

60 See, for example, Dooling, W., ‘The making of a colonial elite: property, family and landed stability in the Cape Colony, c. 1750–1834’, Journal of Southern African Studies, 31:1 (2005), 147–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 Fourie and von Fintel, ‘The dynamics of inequality’; Fourie, J. and von Fintel, D., ‘A history with evidence: income inequality in the Dutch Cape Colony’, Economic History of Developing Regions, 26:1 (2011), 1648CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62 Mentzel, O., A Geographical-Topographical Description of the Cape of Good Hope, Part II (reprint series 6, Cape Town, 2008)Google Scholar; Guelke and Shell, ‘An early colonial landed gentry’.

63 Fourie and von Fintel, ‘A history with evidence’, 35.

64 Ibid. 22.

Ibid

65 J. Fourie and D. von Fintel used several data sources, most of which are now freely available online. These include the tax censuses (opgaafrolle) discussed in ‘The dynamics’ and auction rolls discussed in ‘A history with evidence’.

66 The sources for slave incomes are discussed in Fourie and von Fintel, ‘A history with evidence’.

67 Van Duin and Ross, The Economy.

68 de Zwart, P., ‘Real wages at the Cape of Good Hope: a long-term perspective, 1652–1912’, Tijdschrift voor Sociale en Economische Geschiedenis, 10:2 (2013), 2858CrossRefGoogle Scholar; du Plessis and du Plessis, ‘Happy in the service’.

69 Fourie, ‘The remarkable wealth’.

70 Fourie and van Zanden, ‘GDP in the Dutch Cape Colony’.

71 To keep our estimates as close as possible to those of the original, we add only the new Khoesan population estimates to the denominator (population size) and keep the numerator (output) constant.

72 Fourie, ‘The remarkable wealth’.

Altmetric attention score


Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 283 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 2nd December 2020. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-79f79cbf67-n2swh Total loading time: 0.421 Render date: 2020-12-02T17:23:54.280Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Wed Dec 02 2020 17:05:20 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": false, "languageSwitch": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

THE MISSING PEOPLE: ACCOUNTING FOR THE PRODUCTIVITY OF INDIGENOUS POPULATIONS IN CAPE COLONIAL HISTORY*
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

THE MISSING PEOPLE: ACCOUNTING FOR THE PRODUCTIVITY OF INDIGENOUS POPULATIONS IN CAPE COLONIAL HISTORY*
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

THE MISSING PEOPLE: ACCOUNTING FOR THE PRODUCTIVITY OF INDIGENOUS POPULATIONS IN CAPE COLONIAL HISTORY*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *