Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 86
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    del Pozo, Alejandro Yáñez, Alejandra Matus, Iván A. Tapia, Gerardo Castillo, Dalma Sanchez-Jardón, Laura and Araus, José L. 2016. Physiological Traits Associated with Wheat Yield Potential and Performance under Water-Stress in a Mediterranean Environment. Frontiers in Plant Science, Vol. 7,

    Elía, Mónica Savin, Roxana and Slafer, Gustavo A. 2016. Fruiting efficiency in wheat: physiological aspects and genetic variation among modern cultivars. Field Crops Research, Vol. 191, p. 83.

    Farré, Alba Sayers, Liz Leverington-Waite, Michelle Goram, Richard Orford, Simon Wingen, Luzie Mumford, Cathy and Griffiths, Simon 2016. Application of a library of near isogenic lines to understand context dependent expression of QTL for grain yield and adaptive traits in bread wheat. BMC Plant Biology, Vol. 16, Issue. 1,

    FINNAN, J. M. and SPINK, J. 2016. Identification of yield limiting phenological phases of oats to improve crop management. The Journal of Agricultural Science, p. 1.

    Houshmandfar, Alireza Fitzgerald, Glenn J. Macabuhay, Allene A. Armstrong, Roger Tausz-Posch, Sabine Löw, Markus and Tausz, Michael 2016. Trade-offs between water-use related traits, yield components and mineral nutrition of wheat under Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE). European Journal of Agronomy, Vol. 76, p. 66.

    Li, Kenan Yang, Xiaoguang Tian, Hanqin Pan, Shufen Liu, Zhijuan and Lu, Shuo 2016. Effects of changing climate and cultivar on the phenology and yield of winter wheat in the North China Plain. International Journal of Biometeorology, Vol. 60, Issue. 1, p. 21.

    Li, Pu-Fang Ma, Bao-Luo Yan, Weikai Cheng, Zheng-Guo Li, Feng-Min and Xiong, You-Cai 2016. Plant architecture, plasticity, and adaptation strategies of two oat genotypes under different competition intensities. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Vol. 96, Issue. 5, p. 1431.

    MIRABELLA, N. E. ABBATE, P. E. RAMIREZ, I. A. and PONTAROLI, A. C. 2016. Genetic variation for wheat spike fertility in cultivars and early breeding materials. The Journal of Agricultural Science, Vol. 154, Issue. 01, p. 13.

    Porker, Kenton Eglinton, Jason Coventry, Stewart and Fettell, Neil 2016. Exploration, Identification and Utilization of Barley Germplasm.

    Asseng, Senthold Zhu, Yan Wang, Enli and Zhang, Weijian 2015. Crop Physiology.

    Brodribb, Timothy J. Holloway-Phillips, Meisha-Marika and Bramley, Helen 2015. Crop Physiology.

    Ferrante, Ariel Savin, Roxana and Slafer, Gustavo A. 2015. Relationship between fruiting efficiency and grain weight in durum wheat. Field Crops Research, Vol. 177, p. 109.

    Foulkes, M.J. and Reynolds, M.P. 2015. Crop Physiology.

    Guo, Z. Chen, D. and Schnurbusch, T. 2015. Variance components, heritability and correlation analysis of anther and ovary size during the floral development of bread wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 66, Issue. 11, p. 3099.

    Guo, Zifeng and Schnurbusch, Thorsten 2015. Variation of floret fertility in hexaploid wheat revealed by tiller removal. Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 66, Issue. 19, p. 5945.

    Mądry, Wiesław Studnicki, Marcin Rozbicki, Jan Golba, Jan Gozdowski, Dariusz Pecio, Alicja and Oleksy, Andrzej 2015. Ontogenetic-based sequential path analysis of grain yield and its related traits in several winter wheat cultivars. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B — Soil & Plant Science, Vol. 65, Issue. 7, p. 605.

    Martino, Diana L. Abbate, Pablo E. Cendoya, María G. Gutheim, Florencia Mirabella, Nadia E. Pontaroli, Ana C. and Saranga, Y. 2015. Wheat spike fertility: inheritance and relationship with spike yield components in early generations. Plant Breeding, Vol. 134, Issue. 3, p. 264.

    Qin, Xiaoliang Zhang, Fengxia Liu, Cong Yu, Han Cao, Bengao Tian, Shuiquan Liao, Yuncheng and Siddique, Kadambot H.M. 2015. Wheat yield improvements in China: Past trends and future directions. Field Crops Research, Vol. 177, p. 117.

    Rauf, Saeed Zaharieva, Maria Warburton, Marilyn L ZHANG, Ping-zhi AL-Sadi, Abdullah M Khalil, Farghama Kozak, Marcin and Tariq, Sultan A 2015. Breaking wheat yield barriers requires integrated efforts in developing countries. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, Vol. 14, Issue. 8, p. 1447.

    Slafer, Gustavo A. Elia, Mónica Savin, Roxana García, Guillermo A. Terrile, Ignacio I. Ferrante, Ariel Miralles, Daniel J. and González, Fernanda G. 2015. Fruiting efficiency: an alternative trait to further rise wheat yield. Food and Energy Security, Vol. 4, Issue. 2, p. 92.


PAPER PRESENTED AT INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON INCREASING WHEAT YIELD POTENTIAL, CIMMYT, OBREGON, MEXICO, 20–24 MARCH 2006 Understanding the physiological basis of yield potential in wheat

  • R. A. FISCHER (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 February 2007

The present paper focuses on the physiology of yield potential in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), because breeding progress in yield potential has overtaken farm yield progress. The paper examines developments largely in the last 10 years seeking routes to higher yield potential. Lately this subject has come under pressure from two new imperatives: perceived slowing of genetic progress and ambitious functional genomics. Analysis of trials between 1996 and 2005 at the CIANO research centre in northwest Mexico suggests that yield potential progress in CIMMYT spring wheats has slowed to around 0·50% per year, but has not ceased there nor in winter wheats elsewhere. Meanwhile, in the last 10 years or so, physiological understanding has advanced somewhat. Increased kernel number/m2 remains strongly associated with genetic progress in grain yield, and new research reinforces the importance of spike dry weight (g/m2) at anthesis in its determination. Lengthening the spike growth period through manipulation of sensitivity to photoperiod looks promising, but more attention to kernels per unit of spike weight is also urged. With respect to plant height, an optimum somewhere between 0·7 and 1·0 m is accepted and we are moving away from infatuation with the Norin 10 dwarfing genes as a way of reaching that. What has not been achieved is good lodging resistance in all short spring wheats, nor a complete understanding of its physiological basis. New information is coming to light on the possible role of stored stem reserves at anthesis, for these reserves appear to have increased as yield potential has increased. Part of the benefit may be related to assimilate supply per kernel around anthesis, which new understanding suggests is important for maximum potential kernel weight. Nevertheless, results continue to suggest that despite more kernels/m2, the most recent wheats are still largely sink-limited during grain filling. Growing evidence from spring and winter wheat (and from rice and maize) now points to the importance of increased photosynthetic activity before and around flowering for recent genetic increases in yield potential. This opens up new possibilities for selection in field plots. Finally, attention is given to effects of weather on yield potential and recent advances in techniques for elucidating the physiological basis of genotype by year interactions. From physiological understanding such as described, traits can be suggested as possible selection criteria for yield potential. However, apart from the ACIAR/CIMMYT project looking at stomatal aperture-related traits as well as source and sink traits (Condon et al., in press; Reynolds et al., in press; van Ginkel et al., in press), there appear to have been few attempts to validate physiological (or morphological) selection criteria for wheat yield potential in the last decade, but recent promising results with spectral reflection indices could foreshadow more validation work. This contrasts with efforts to improve the performance of wheat (and maize) under water-limited conditions, and with the new plant type and super rice approaches of IRRI and China, respectively. Such research could be mapped out for wheat yield potential improvement, and could lead to more efficient breeding for yield potential and/or faster progress, but it requires a multidisciplinary team, including, nowadays, molecular biologists. It also needs suitable controlled and field environments and substantial long-term support. All this may no longer be available in the public sector, at least at a single location.

Corresponding author
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Agricultural Science
  • ISSN: 0021-8596
  • EISSN: 1469-5146
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-agricultural-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *