Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Synergies between the mitigation of, and adaptation to, climate change in agriculture

  • P. SMITH (a1) and J. E. OLESEN (a2)
Summary

There is a very significant, cost effective greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation potential in agriculture. The annual mitigation potential in agriculture is estimated to be 4200, 2600 and 1600 Mt CO2 equiv/yr at C prices of 100, 50 and 20 US$/t CO2 equiv, respectively. The value of GHG mitigated each year is equivalent to 420 000, 130 000 and 32 000 million US$/yr for C prices of 100, 50 and 20 US$/t CO2 equiv, respectively. From both the mitigation and economic perspectives, we cannot afford to miss out on this mitigation potential.

The challenge of agriculture within the climate change context is two-fold, both to reduce emissions and to adapt to a changing and more variable climate. The primary aim of the mitigation options is to reduce emissions of methane or nitrous oxide or to increase soil carbon storage. All the mitigation options, therefore, affect the carbon and/or nitrogen cycle of the agroecosystem in some way. This often not only affects the GHG emissions but also the soil properties and nutrient cycling. Adaptation to increased variability of temperature and rainfall involves increasing the resilience of the production systems. This may be done by improving soil water holding capacities through adding crop residues and manure to arable soils or by adding diversity to the crop rotations.

Though some mitigation measures may have negative impacts on the adaptive capacity of farming systems, most categories of adaptation options for climate change have positive impacts on mitigation. These include: (1) measures that reduce soil erosion, (2) measures that reduce leaching of nitrogen and phosphorus, (3) measures for conserving soil moisture, (4) increasing the diversity of crop rotations by choices of species or varieties, (5) modification of microclimate to reduce temperature extremes and provide shelter, (6) land use change involving abandonment or extensification of existing agricultural land, or avoidance of the cultivation of new land. These adaptation measures will in general, if properly applied, reduce GHG emissions, by improving nitrogen use efficiencies and improving soil carbon storage.

There appears to be a large potential for synergies between mitigation and adaptation within agriculture. This needs to be incorporated into economic analyses of the mitigation costs. The inter-linkages between mitigation and adaptation are, however, not very well explored and further studies are warranted to better quantify short- and long-term effects on suitability for mitigation and adaptation to climate change. In order to realize the full potential for agriculture in a climate change context, new agricultural production systems need to be developed that integrate bioenergy and food and feed production systems. This may possibly be obtained with perennial crops having low-environmental impacts, and deliver feedstocks for biorefineries for the production of biofuels, biomaterials and feed for livestock.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email: pete.smith@abdn.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Beach, R. H., DeAngelo, B. J., Rose, S., Li, C., Salas, W. & DelGrosso, S. J. (2008). Mitigation potential and costs for global agricultural greenhouse gas emissions. Agricultural Economics 38, 109115.
Cannell, M. G. R., van Noordwijk, M. & Ong, C. K. (1996). The central agroforestry hypothesis: the trees must acquire resources that the crop would not otherwise acquire. Agroforestry Systems 34, 2731.
Cassman, K. G., Dobermann, A., Walters, D. T. & Yang, H. (2003). Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 28, 315358.
Christensen, J. H., Hewitson, B., Busuioc, A., Chen, A., Gao, X., Held, I., Jones, R., Kolli, R. K., Kwon, W.-T., Laprise, R., Magaña Rueda, V., Mearns, L., Menéndez, C. G., Räisänen, J., Rinke, A., Sarr, A. & Whetton, P. (2007). Regional climate projections. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Eds Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Avery, K. B., Tigor, M. & Miller, H. L.), pp. 847940. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Crutzen, P. J., Mosier, A. R., Smith, K. A. & Winiwarter, W. (2008). N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 8, 389395.
Daigneault, A., Beach, R., McCarl, B. & Murray, B. (2009). Modeling alternative policies for forestry and agricultural GHG mitigation: allowances vs. offsets. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 6, 242004. doi: 10.1088/1755-1307/6/4/242004
Dornburg, V., Faaij, A., Verweij, P., Langeveld, H., van de Ven, G., Wester, F., van Keulen, H., van Diepen, K., Meeusen, M., Banse, M., Ros, J., van Vuuren, D., van den Born, G. J., van Oorschot, M., Smout, F., van Vliet, J., Aiking, H., Londo, M., Mozaffarian, H., Smekens, K., Meeusen, M., Banse, M., Lysen, E. & van Egmond, S. (2008). Biomass Assessment: Assessment of Global Biomass Potentials and their Links to Food, Water, Biodiversity, Energy Demand and Economy. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Copernicus Institute, Utrecht University.
FAO (2006). World Agriculture: Towards 2030/2050. Interim Report. Global Perspective Studies Unit. Rome: FAO.
Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S. & Hawthorne, P. (2008). Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319, 12351238.
Fischer, G., Hizsnyik, E., Prieler, S., Shah, M. & van Velthuizen, H. (2009). Biofuels and Food Security: Implications of an Accelerated Biofuels Production. Vienna, Austria: The OPEC Fund for International Development (OFID).
Lin, B. B., Perfecto, I. & Vandermeer, J. (2008). Synergies between agricultural intensification and climate change could create surprising vulnerabilities for crops. BioScience 58, 847854.
Mäder, P., Fließbach, A., Dubois, D., Gunst, L., Fried, P. & Niggli, U. (2002). Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296, 16941697.
Mertz, O., Halsnæs, K., Olesen, J. E. & Rasmussen, K. (2009). Adaptation to climate change in developing countries. Environmental Management 43, 743752.
Moran, D., MacLeod, M., Wall, E., Eory, V., Pajot, G., Matthews, R., McVittie, A., Barnes, A., Rees, B., Moxey, A., Williams, A. & Smith, P. (2008). UK Marginal Abatement Cost Curves for the Agriculture and Land Use, Land-use Change and Forestry Sectors out to 2022, with Qualitative Analysis of Options to 2050. Final Report to UK Committee on Climate Change. London: Committee on Climate Change.
Olesen, J. E., Rubæk, G., Heidmann, T., Hansen, S. & Børgesen, C. D. (2004). Effect of climate change on greenhouse gas emission from arable crop rotations. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 70, 147160.
Pan, G., Smith, P. & Pan, W. (2009). The role of soil organic matter in maintaining the productivity and yield stability of cereals in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 129, 344348.
Popp, A. & Lotze-Campen, H. (2009). The net-benefit of bioenergy for climate change mitigation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 6, 242007. doi:10.1088/1755-1307/6/4/242007
Rose, S., Beach, R., Li, C., Salas, W. & Daigneault, A. (2009). Modeling marginal biophysical responses to assess cropland greenhouse gas abatement potential. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 6, 242003. doi:10.1088/1755-1307/6/4/242003
Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R. A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D. & Yu, T.-H. (2008). Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319, 12381242.
Six, J., Ogle, S. M., Breidt, F. J., Conant, R. T., Mosier, A. R. & Paustian, K. (2004). The potential to mitigate global warming with no-tillage management is only realized when practised in the long term. Global Change Biology 10, 155160.
Smith, P., Martino, D., Cai, Z., Gwary, D., Janzen, H. H., Kumar, P., McCarl, B., Ogle, S., O'Mara, F., Rice, C., Scholes, R. J., Sirotenko, O., Howden, M., McAllister, T., Pan, G., Romanenkov, V., Rose, S., Schneider, U., Towprayoon, S. & Wattenbach, M. (2007 a). Agriculture. In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Eds Metz, B., Davidson, O. R., Bosch, P. R., Dave, R. & Meyer, L. A.), pp. 499540. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, P., Martino, D., Cai, Z., Gwary, D., Janzen, H. H., Kumar, P., McCarl, B., Ogle, S., O'Mara, F., Rice, C., Scholes, R. J., Sirotenko, O., Howden, M., McAllister, T., Pan, G., Romanenkov, V., Schneider, U. & Towprayoon, S. (2007 b). Policy and technological constraints to implementation of greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 118, 6–28.
Smith, P., Martino, D., Cai, Z., Gwary, D., Janzen, H. H., Kumar, P., McCarl, B., Ogle, S., O'Mara, F., Rice, C., Scholes, R. J., Sirotenko, O., Howden, M., McAllister, T., Pan, G., Romanenkov, V., Schneider, U., Towprayoon, S., Wattenbach, M. & Smith, J. U. (2008). Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363, 789813.
Sommer, S. G., Olesen, J. E., Petersen, S. O., Weisbjerg, M. R., Valli, L., Rodhe, L. & Béline, F. (2009). Region-specific assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation with different manure management strategies in four agroecological zones. Global Change Biology 15, 28252837.
Tubiello, F. N., Soussana, J. F. & Howden, S. M. (2007). Crop and pasture response to climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104, 1968619690.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Agricultural Science
  • ISSN: 0021-8596
  • EISSN: 1469-5146
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-agricultural-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed