We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2009
Christianity and Social Order was a creature of its time and, although influential over several decades, is challenged by today's plurality and globalization. Nevertheless, the ascendancy of Radical and Neo-Orthodoxy repeats imbalances of the Christendom Group which Temple was concerned to counter. Temple's greatest weakness for today is his failure to appreciate the trend towards profound social plurality, and its challenge to his strong idea of nationhood. However, today's global economy suggests that plurality must be held in tension with other aspects of the dominant market model. Temple's work reinforces important critiques of market economics, including scepticism about the alleged impossibility of moral agreement. This in turn suggests that total abandonment of Temple's Middle Axiom approach may be premature. A better-developed theology of correctives would reflect classic Christian vocabulary, cohere with Temple's approach, and offer a route toward the revitalization of the Anglican tradition of public theology.
1. Spencer, Stephen, William Temple: A Calling to Prophecy (London: SPCK, 2001), p. xGoogle Scholar; Preston, Ronald, ‘Introduction Thirty-five Years Later; 1941–1976’, in William Temple, Christianity and Social Order (London: SPCK, 1976), p. 5.Google Scholar
2. Temple never used the term ‘Middle Axiom’, and Ronald Preston, as the postwar doyen of the method, preferred to avoid it. I have continued to use the expression ‘Middle Axioms’ in this essay for the sake of having a convenient and widely recognized term for the approach.
3. Preston, , ‘Introduction’, p. 5Google Scholar. Preston had been strongly influenced by Temple and remained, throughout his long life, an apologist for the kind of social engagement and theological method which Temple had outlined in Christianity and Social Order. Preston's last theological writing, completed just before he died in 2001, was a review of Stephen Spencer's book on Temple (Spencer, , William Temple ).Google Scholar
4. Wheen, Francis, How Mumbo-Jumbo Conquered the World (London: Fourth Estate, 2004), p. 9.Google Scholar
5. Barnes, Julian, Letters from London, 1990–1995 (London: Picador, 1995), pp. 242–43.Google Scholar
6. Temple, William, Christianity and Social Order (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1942), p. 15Google Scholar. As Iremonger points out, this is a rather specialized interpretation of Natural Law, but not an idiosyncratic one (Iremonger, F.A., William Temple: Archbishop of Canterbury (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1948), p. 436.Google Scholar
7. Temple, , Christianity and Social Order, p. 17.Google Scholar
8. Temple, , Christianity and Social Order, p. 21.Google Scholar
9. Temple, , Christianity and Social Order, p. 36.Google Scholar
10. Preston, , ‘Introduction’, p. 6.Google Scholar
11. Temple, , Christianity and Social Order, p. 89.Google Scholar
12. Temple, , Christianity and Social Order, p. 19.Google Scholar
13. Quoted in Suggate, Alan M., William Temple and Christian Social Ethics Today (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1987), p. 66.Google Scholar
14. See Demant, V.A., Religion and the Decline of Capitalism (London: Faber & Faber, 1949).Google Scholar
15. Suggate helpfully notes that Hauerwas's attack on Christian Realism fails to appreciate the di ferent manifestations of ‘liberalism’ in the USA and Britain, consequently Hauerwas's anti-liberal rhetoric sometimes feels to British audiences to be attacking a straw-man. See Suggate, Alan M., ‘Whither Anglican Social Ethics?’, Crucible (04–06 2001), pp. 106–22.Google Scholar
16. Spencer, , William Temple, p. 26.Google Scholar
17. Milbank, John, ‘“Postmodern Critical Augustinianism”: A Short Summa in Forty Two Responses to Unasked Questions’, Modern Theology 7.3 (04 1991), p. 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. See, for example, the work of Shanks, Andrew in his Civil Society: Civil Religion (Oxford: Blackwell, 1995)Google Scholar, and God and Modernity: A New and Better Way to Do Theology (London: Routledge, 2000)Google Scholar, for a helpful discussion of this point.
19. Preston, , ‘Introduction’ p. 16.Google Scholar
20. Hayek, F.A., The Road to Serfdom (London: Routledge, 1944)Google Scholar. See also Hayek, F.A., Law, Legislation and Liberty. II. The Mirage of Social Justice (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1976).Google Scholar
21. For a very clear and succinct summary of these arguments, see Plant, Raymond et al. , ‘Conservative Capitalism: Theological and Moral Challenges’, in Harvey, A. (ed.), Theology in the City (London: SPCK, 1989), pp. 68–97.Google Scholar
22. This can be seen in his description of the bishops' intervention with Baldwin during the coal strike of 1926 the failure of which causes him to recognize the limits of agreement even as he holds out for its possibility (Temple, , Christianity and Social Order, pp. 22–23)Google Scholar. The idea is also present in embryonic form in Temple's description of the State as the ‘Community of Communities’ (p. 48). His discussion of the relationship between the higher, and the lower, but indispensable, principles explores this theme in greatest depth (pp. 59–61).
23. Temple, , Christianity and Social Order, pp. 50–51.Google Scholar
24. ‘Freedom so far as it is a treasure must be freedom for something as well as freedom from something. It must be the actual ability to form and carry out a purpose.’ Temple, , Christianity and Social Order, p. 45Google Scholar. Italics in the original.
25. ‘A democracy which is to be Christian must be a democracy of persons, not only of individuals. It must not only tolerate but encourage minor communities as at once the expression and the arena of personal freedom…’ (p. 49).Google Scholar
26. Temple, , Christianity and Social Order, p. 47.Google Scholar
27. See Steedman, Ian, ‘Idolatry, Lost Icons and Consumer Preferences’, in Graham, Elaine L. and Reed, Esther D. (eds.), The Future of Christian Social Ethics: Essays on the Work of Ronald H. Preston, 1913–2001 (New York: Continuum, 2004), pp. 87–103.Google Scholar
28. Temple, , Christianity and Social Order, p. 56.Google Scholar
29. Kent, John, William Temple: Church, State and Society in Britain, 1880–1950 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 181.Google Scholar
30. Kent, , William Temple, p. 182.Google Scholar
31. A simple example of this is the enormous variety of (say) olive oils available in supermarkets which are an effective cartel of maybe four large corporations. The supermarkets' control over diversity is evidenced by the lack of choice in products such as fresh fruit where diversity generates additional costs more rapidly.
32. See MacIntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory (London: Duckworth, 2nd edn, 1985)Google Scholar; Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (London: Duckworth, 1988)Google Scholar. Brown, Malcolm, After the Market: Economics, Moral Agreement and the Churches' Mission (Bern: Peter Lang, 2004)Google Scholar, attempts to develop this use of MacIntyre further.
33. Dackson, Wendy, The Ecclesiology of Archbishop William Temple (1881–1944) (Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 2004), p. 110.Google Scholar
34. Ronald Preston was among the first to explore the clear links between the Christendom Group and the early work of John Milbank in his essay ‘Christian Socialism Becalmed’, originally published in Theology, 91.739 (1988), pp. 24–32Google Scholar, and reprinted in Elford, R. John and Markham, Ian S., The Middle Way: Theology, Politics and Economics in the Later Thought of R.H. Preston (London: SCM Press, 2000), pp. 91–99.Google Scholar
35. Milbank, J., Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).Google Scholar
36. Milbank, , Theology and Social Theory, p. 433.Google Scholar
37. Lash, Nicholas, ‘Not Exactly Politics or Power?’, Modern Theology, 8.4 (1992), p. 363.Google Scholar
38. Lash, , ‘Not Exactly Politics or Power’, p. 362.Google Scholar
39. In his opening pages, Milbank makes the point that the mediaeval ‘secular’ was understood precisely as this ‘interim’, ‘where coercive justice, private property and impaired natural reason must make shift to cope with the unredeemed effects of sinful humanity’ (Theology and Social Theory, p. 9Google Scholar). But Milbank does not clarify why this ‘interim theology’ is no longer appropriate, or how it relates to his own position. For a fuller discussion of these points, see Brown, After the Market.
40. Williams, Rowan, ‘Saving Time: Thoughts on Practice, Patience and Vision’, New Blackfriars, 861 (1992), p. 323.Google Scholar
41. See Markham, Ian, Truth and the Reality of God: An Essay in Natural Theology (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1998).Google Scholar
42. Suggate, , William Temple and Christian Social Ethics Today, pp. 218–19Google Scholar. Suggate argues that the Bible endorses natural morality on four grounds: the image of God in humanity persists after the Fall; the Gentiles know certain moral norms through the exercise of conscience; St John argues that judgment falls upon those who flout the moral order which God has set up for the world; and redeemed humanity is transformed and renewed rather than totally remade.
43. Markham, Ian, ‘Ronald Preston and the Contemporary Ethical Scene’, in Elford and Markham (eds.), The Middle Way, p. 257.Google Scholar
44. Forrester, Duncan, ‘Returning Friendly Fire: Ronald Preston and the New Ecumenical Social Ethics’, Crucible, 10–12 (1997), pp. 189–98.Google Scholar
45. Suskind, Ron, ‘Without a Doubt’, New York Times Magazine (17 10 2004)Google Scholar. See http:/www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/magazine/17BUSH (accessed 16 December 2005).
46. See Clark, Henry, The Church under Thatcher (London: SPCK, 1993).Google Scholar
47. See Suggate, , ‘Whither Anglican Social Ethics?’Google Scholar
48. Banner, Michael, ‘Nothing to Declare’, The Church Times (16 06 1995)Google Scholar. Board for Social Responsibility, Something to Celebrate (London: Church House Publishing, 1995).Google Scholar
49. Atherton, John, Public Theology for Changing Times (London: SPCK, 2000).Google Scholar
50. See Kraybill, Donald B., ‘Amish Economics: The Interface of Religious Values and Economic Interests’, in Hay, Donald A. and Kreider, Alan (eds.), Christianity and the Culture of Economics (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 2001), pp. 76–90.Google Scholar
51. Archbishops' Commission on Urban Priority Areas, Faith in the City (London: Church House Publishing, 1985).Google Scholar
52. Unemployment and the Future of Work: A Report for the Churches (London: Council of Churches for Britain and Ireland, 1997)Google Scholar. The report's ecumenicity did not stop much of the media from running a ‘bishops versus the government’ storyline.
