¹ Rhys-Davids, T. W., Buddhism (London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1886), p. 176.Google Scholar

² de La Vallée Poussin, Louis, The Way to Nirvāṇna, (Cambridge University Press, 1917), p. III.Google Scholar

³ de La Vallée Poussin, Louis, Nirvāṇna, (Paris: Beauchesne, 1925).Google Scholar

⁴ Jayatilleke, K. N., “Some Problems of Translation and Interpretation II,” University of Ceylon Review, 8 (1950), p. 45–55.Google Scholar

⁵ Raju, P. T., “The Principle of Four-Cornered Negation in Indian Philosophy,” Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 7, p. 694–713Google Scholar.

⁶ Bahm, Archie J., “Does Seven-Fold Predication Equal Four-Cornered Negation Reversed?”, PEW, VII, 3 & 4 (1957), p. 127–130.Google Scholar

⁷ Miyamoto, Shōson, “The Logic of Relativity as the Common Ground for the Development of the Middle Way,” in Buddhism and Culture, ed. Yamaguchi, Susumu, (Kyoto: 1960), p. 67–88.Google Scholar

⁸ Schayer, Stanislaw, “Altindische Antizipationen der Aussagenlogik,” Bulletin de l'Académie Polonaise, classe de philologie, (1933), p. 90–96.Google Scholar

⁹ Nakamura, Hajime, 1) “Kūkan no Kigō-ronrigaku-teki kaimei” [Some Clarifications of the Concept of Voidness from the Standpoint of Symbolic Logic], Indogaku Bukkyōgaku Kenkyü III, 1 (1954), p. 223–231Google Scholar. 2) “Buddhist Logic Expounded by Means of Symbolic Logic,” IBK VII, 1 (1958), p. 375–395.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Robinson, Richard H., “Some Logical Aspects of Nāgārjuna's System,” PEW VI, 4 (1957), p. 291–308.Google Scholar

¹¹ Robinson, Richard H., “Mysticism and Logic in Seng-chao's Thought,” PEW VIII, 3 & 4 (1958–59) p. 99–120.Google Scholar

¹² Majjhima Nikāya No. 72.

¹³ Jayatilleke, K. N., “The Logic of Four Alternatives,” PEW XVII, 1–4 (1967), p. 69–83.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Brahma-jāla Sutta, Dīgha Nikāya No. 1, PTS edition 1.31.

¹⁵ cf. Robinson, Richard H., “The Classical Indian Axiomatic,” PEW XVII, 1–4 (1967), p. 141.Google Scholar

¹⁶ PEW VI, 4, p. 299, 303.

¹⁷ cf. Yüan-k'ang, , PEW VIII, 3 & 4, p. 114Google Scholar, and Robinson, Richard H., Early Mädhyamīka in India and China, (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1967), p. 135–136Google Scholar. Jayatilleke gives an example with “east” and “west,” but adduces no canonical or extracanonical instance.

¹⁸ Jayatilleke, book, p. 278. See Majjhima II. 197.

¹⁹ Saṃyutta IV, 400–401. cf. Étienne Lamotte, Traité de la grande vertu de Sagosse, (Louvain: Bureau du Mugéon, 1944). Vol. I, p. 32, n. 3.

²⁰ Candrakīrti, , Prasannapadā Madhyamakavṛtti, ed. de La Vallée Poussin, L., (St. Pétersbourgh, 1903–1913). p. 354 ff.Google Scholar

²¹ Jayatilleke, book, p. 361–368. See Aṅguttara 1.60.

²² Candrakīrti, Prasannapadā 370.1, explains this as meaning that the skandhas, dhātus and āyatanas are real. Jayatilleke, PEW p. 82, mistranslates: “Nāgārjuna, however, says that according to the Buddha, propositions could be true, false, both true and false, and neither true nor false.”

²³ Majjhima I, 240 ff. cf. Thomas, E. J., The Life of the Buddha, (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1927), p. 63.Google Scholar

²⁴ Mahāvagga I. S. 1–13.