Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-l48q4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-24T02:36:04.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A crosslinguistic investigation of vowel formants in babbling*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 February 2009

Bénédicte de Boysson-Bardies*
Affiliation:
C.N.R.S. & E.H.E.S.S.Université Paris V
Pierre Halle
Affiliation:
C.N.R.S. & E.H.E.S.S.Université Paris V
Laurent Sagart
Affiliation:
C.N.R.S. & E.H.E.S.S.Université Paris V
Catherine Durand
Affiliation:
C.N.R.S. & E.H.E.S.S.Université Paris V
*
Laboratoire de Psychologie Expérimentale, 54 Bld Raspail, 75006 Paris, France.

Abstract

A cross-cultural investigation of the influence of target-language in babbling was carried out. 1047 vowels produced by twenty 10-month-old infants from Parisian French, London English, Hong Kong Cantonese and Algiers Arabic language backgrounds were recorded in the cities of origin and spectrally analysed. F1-F2 plots of these vowels were obtained for each subject and each language group. Statistical analyses provide evidence of differences between infants across language backgrounds. These differences parallel those found in adult speech in the corresponding languages. Implications of an early build-up of target-language-oriented production skills are discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Part of this data was presented at the Fourth International Congress for the Study of Child Language and at the Eleventh International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. This research was supported by A.T.P. no. 955138 C.N.R.S. We would like to thank Saleha Chabani and D. Ben Sultana from Algiers, and J. Philips from the MRC Cognitive Development Unit, London, for their help. We are also grateful to the infants' parents who allowed us to conduct our recordings.

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, K., MacWhinney, B. & Stoel, C. (1970). An experiment in the recognition of babbling. Psychological Review of Child language Development 1. 71–6.Google Scholar
Benkirane, T. (1982). Etude phonétique et fonctions de la syllabe en arabe marocain. Thèse de troisième cycle, Université d'Aix-en-Provence.Google Scholar
Boysson-Bardies, B. de, Sagart, L. & Durand, C. (1984). Discernible differences in the babbling of infants according to target-language. Journal of Child language 11. 115.Google Scholar
Boysson-Bardies, B. de, Sagart, L., Hallé, P. & Durand, C. (1986). Acoustic investigation of cross-linguistic variability in babbling. In Lindblom, B. & Zetterstrom, R. (eds), Precursors of early speech. New York: Stockton Press.Google Scholar
Boysson-Bardies, B. de, Sagart, L. & Hallé, P. (1987). The influence of target language on vocalic space in ten-month-old infants. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Tallinn, Estonia.Google Scholar
Buhr, R. D. (1980). The emergence of vowels in an infant. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 23. 6294.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1979). Phonology as an individual access system: some data from language acquisition. In Fillmore, C. J., Kempler, D. & Wang, W. S. (eds), Individual differences in language ability and language behavior. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1986). Discovering sound unit and constructing sound system: it's child's play. In Perkell, J. S. & Klatt, D. H. (eds), Invariance and variability in speech processes. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. & Farwell, C. B. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Language 51. 419–39.Google Scholar
Fok, A. (1979). The frequency of occurrence of speech sounds and tones in Cantonese. In Lord, R. (ed.), Hong Kong language papers. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Fry, D. B. (1947). The frequency of occurrence of speech sounds in Southern English. Archives Néerlandaises de Phonétique Expérimentale. 103–6.Google Scholar
Henton, C. C. (1983). Changes in vowels of received pronunciation. Journal of Phonetics 11. 353–71.Google Scholar
Ichijima, T. (1987). Infants' utterances during the babbling period: crosslinguistic analysis through perceptual and acoustic experiments. Paper presented at the Poster Session of the International Society of Behavioural Development, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Imai, S. & Abe, Y. (1979). Spectral envelope extraction by improved cepstral method. IECE, J62-A 4. 217–23.Google Scholar
Kent, R. D. & Bauer, H. R. (1985). Vocalizations of the one-year-old. Journal of Child Language 12. 491526.Google Scholar
Kent, R. D. & Murray, A. D. (1982). Acoustic features of infant vocalic utterances at 3, 6 and 9 months. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 72. 353–65.Google Scholar
Lee, T. (1985). The phonetic quality and long/short distinction of Cantonese vowels. Fangyan (Dialect) 1. 2838.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P. (1980). On the development of vowel production in young children. In Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Kavanagh, J. F. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds), Child phonology. Vol. 1. Production. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, B. (1984). Can the models of evolutionary biology be applied to phonetics problems? In van der Broecke, M. P. & Cohen, A. (eds), Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Lindblom, B., MacNeilage, P. & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1983). Self-organizing processes and explanation of phonological universals. In Butterworth, B., Comrie, B. & Dahl, O. (eds), Explanations of linguistic universals. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Locke, J. L. (1983). Phonological acquisition and change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Longchamp, F. (in press). Acoustique descriptive des sons du Français. In Tubach, J. P. (ed.), La parole et son traitement automatique. Paris: Collection Scientifique et Technique des Télécommunications.Google Scholar
Mardia, K. V. (1977). Multivariate analysis. IV. In Krishnaiah, P. R. (ed.), Mahalannobis distances and angles. New York: North Holland.Google Scholar
McCune, L. & Vihman, M. (1987). Vocal motor schemas. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 2, 6. 72–9.Google Scholar
Nakazima, S. (1962). A comparative study of the speech development of Japanese and American English in childhood. Studia Phonologica 2. 2739.Google Scholar
Oller, D. K. (1980). The emergence of the sounds of speech in infancy. In Yeni-Komshian, G., Kavanagh, C. & Ferguson, C. (eds), Child phonology: perception and production. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Oller, D. K. (1986). Metaphonology and infant vocalizations. In Lindblom, B. & Zetterstrom, R. (eds), Precursors of early speech. New York: Stockton Press.Google Scholar
Oller, D. K. & Eilers, R. E. (1982). Similarity of babbling in Spanish and English-learning babies. Journal of Child Language 9. 565–77.Google Scholar
Olney, R. & Scholnick, E. (1976). Adult judgements of age and linguistic differences in infant vocalisations. Journal of Child Language 3. 145–56.Google Scholar
Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1986). Sources of variability in early speech development. In Perkell, J. S. & Klatt, D. H. (eds), Invariance and variability in speech processes. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Thevenin, D. M., Eilers, R. E., Oller, D. K. & Lavoie, L. (1985). Where is the drift in babbling? A cross-linguistic study. Applied Psycholinguistics 6. 115.Google Scholar
Tuaycharoen, P. (1979). An account of speech development of a Thai child: from babbling to speech. In Thongkum, T. L., Panupong, V., Kullavanijaya, P. & Tingsabadh, M. R. (eds), Studies in Thai and Mon-Kmer phonetics and phonology: in honor of Eugenie J. A. Henderson. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Vihman, M. M., Ferguson, C. A. & Elbert, M. (1986). Phonological development from babbling to speech: common tendencies and individual differences. Applied Psycholinguistics 7. 340.Google Scholar
Weir, R. W. (1966). Some questions on the child's learning of phonology. In Smith, F. & Miller, G. A. (eds), The genesis of language. Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Werker, J. & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development 7. 4963.Google Scholar
Wioland, F. (1972). Estimation de la fréquence des phonèmes en français parlé. Travaux de l'Institut de Phonétique 4. 177204.Google Scholar