Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-jks4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-13T13:22:11.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Family Therapy for Adolescent Anorexia Nervosa: The Results of a Controlled Comparison of Two Family Interventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2000

Ivan Eisler
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College, and South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, U.K.
Christopher Dare
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College, and South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, U.K.
Matthew Hodes
Affiliation:
Imperial College School of Medicine, London, U.K.
Gerald Russell
Affiliation:
Hayes Grove Priory Hospital and Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College, London, U.K.
Elizabeth Dodge
Affiliation:
South London and Maudsley NHS Trust and Royal Free Hospital, London, U.K.
Daniel Le Grange
Affiliation:
University of Chicago, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a randomised treatment trial of two forms of outpatient family intervention for anorexia nervosa. Forty adolescent patients with anorexia nervosa were randomly assigned to “conjoint family therapy” (CFT) or to “separated family therapy” (SFT) using a stratified design controlling for levels of critical comments using the Expressed Emotion index. The design required therapists to undertake both forms of treatment and the distinctiveness of the two therapies was ensured by separate supervisors conducting live supervision of the treatments. Measures were undertaken on admission to the study, at 3 months, at 6 months and at the end of treatment. Considerable improvement in nutritional and psychological state occurred across both treatment groups. On global measure of outcome, the two forms of therapy were associated with equivalent end of treatment results. However, for those patients with high levels of maternal criticism towards the patient, the SFT was shown to be superior to the CFT. When individual status measures were explored, there were further differences between the treatments. Symptomatic change was more marked in the SFT whereas there was considerably more psychological change in the CFT group. There were significant changes in family measures of Expressed Emotion. Critical comments between parents and patient were significantly reduced and that between parents was also diminished. Warmth between parents increased.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Association for Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)