Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Influence of milk yield, stage of lactation, and body condition on dairy cattle lying behaviour measured using an automated activity monitoring sensor

  • Jeffrey M Bewley (a1), Robert E Boyce (a2), Jeremy Hockin (a3), Lene Munksgaard (a4), Susan D Eicher (a5), Mark E Einstein (a1) and Michael M Schutz (a1)...
Abstract

Time spent lying by lactating Holstein-Friesian cows of varying body condition scores (BCS) and milk yield was measured using an animal activity monitor. A 3-week average BCS was calculated for each cow; and in total, 84 cows were selected with 28 cows each among three BCS categories (Thin: BCS<2·75; Moderate: 2·75⩾BCS<3·25; Heavy: BCS⩾3·25) and two stage of lactation categories (<150 days in milk or >150 days in milk). Cows were kept in two management systems: parlour/freestall (n=60) or automated milking system/freestall (n=24). Behaviour was recorded for 5·3±0·1 d for each cow. Production levels were considered using a 28-d rolling average of daily milk production. Cows that exhibited clinical lameness before or during the observation period were excluded from analyses. For cows exhibiting oestrus, the day prior to, day of, and day following breeding were removed. The final analysis included 77 cows (408 d of observation). A mixed model was fitted to describe average daily hours spent lying. Results demonstrated that lying time increased as days in milk (DIM) increased (P=0·05). Variables that were tested but not significant (P>0·05) were BCS category, parity category (1 or ⩾2) and 28-d rolling average daily milk production. Although a numerical trend for increasing hours spent lying with increasing BCS was observed, after accounting for other factors in the mixed model, BCS did not significantly impact lying time. Continued investigation of these management factors that impact lying time and bouts, using new technologies, more cows, and more herds will help dairy owners better manage facilities and cow movements to optimize this essential behaviour.

Copyright
Corresponding author
For correspondence; e-mail: jbewley@uky.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

S Chaplin & L Munksgaard 2001 Evaluation of a simple method for assessment of rising behaviour in tethered dairy cows. Animal Science 72 191197

NB Cook , TB Bennett & KV Nordlund 2005 Monitoring indices of cow comfort in free-stall-housed dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 88 38763885

MD Cooper , DR Arney & CJC Phillips 2007 Two- or four-hour lying deprivation on the behavior of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90 11491158


M Drissler , M Gaworski , CB Tucker & DM Weary 2005 Freestall maintenance: effects on lying behavior of dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 88 23812387

AJ Edmonson , IJ Lean , LD Weaver , T Farver & G Webster 1989 A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 72 6878

MI Endres & AE Barberg 2007 Behavior of dairy cows in an alternative bedded-pack housing system. Journal of Dairy Science 90 41924200

JO Ferguson , DT Galligan & N Thomsen 1994 Principal descriptors of body condition score in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 77 26952703

JA Fregonesi & JD Leaver 2001 Behaviour, performance and health indicators of welfare for dairy cows housed in strawyard or cubicle systems. Livestock Production Science 68 205216

MB Jensen , LJ Pedersen & L Munksgaard 2005 The effect of reward duration on demand functions for rest in dairy heifers and lying requirements as measured by demand functions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 90 207217

ST Juarez , PH Robinson , EJ DePeters & EO Price 2003 Impact of lameness on behavior and productivity of lactating Holstein cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 83 114

CC Krohn & L Munksgaard 1993 Behaviour of dairy cows kept in extensive (loose housing/pasture) or intensive (tie stall) environments II. Lying and lying-down behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37 116

L Munksgaard , MB Jensen , LJ Pedersen , W Hansen & L Matthews 2005 Quantifying behavioural priorities – effects of time constraints on behaviour of dairy cows, Bos taurus. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 92 3–14

L Munksgaard & P Lovendahl 1993 Effects of social and physical stressors on growth hormone levels in dairy cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 73 847853

L Munksgaard & HB Simonsen 1996 Behavioral and pituitary adrenal-axis responses of dairy cows to social isolation and deprivation of lying down. Journal of Animal Science 74 769778

K O'Driscoll , L Boyle & A Hanlon 2008 A brief note on the validation of a system for recording lying behaviour in dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 111 195200

SS Singh , WR Ward , K Lautenbach , JW Hughes & RD Murray 1993 Behaviour of first lactation and adult dairy cows while housed and at pasture and its relationship with sole lesions. Veterinary Record 133 469474

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Dairy Research
  • ISSN: 0022-0299
  • EISSN: 1469-7629
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-dairy-research
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: