Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:37:11.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bank Rates of Return and Entry Restrictions, 1869–1914

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

John J. Binder
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Finance, University of Illinois-Chicago, Chicago, IL60680.
David T. Brown
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Finance, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611.

Abstract

This article uses a variety of data in a simple regression framework to test various hypotheses about the regional differences in U.S. bank rates of return existing before 1915. We find that the observed pattern in the return differences is a function of the measures of bank returns used in previous studies, regional differences in economic conditions, restrictions on interstate branch banking, and private bank minimum capital requirements. These results are inconsistent with most of the bank monopoly-power hypotheses in the literature.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Banker's Association, The Bank Chartering History and Policies of the United States (New York, 1935).Google Scholar
Barnett, George E., State Banks and Trust Companies Since the Passage of the National-Bank Act (Washington, DC, 1911).Google Scholar
Belsley, David A., Kuh, Edwin, and Welsch, Roy E., Regression Diagnostics (New York, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, John J., and Brown, David T., “Bank Rates of Return and Entry Restrictions, 1869–1914” (Working paper, University of Illinois-Chicago, 04 1988).Google Scholar
Breckenridge, R. M., “Discount Rates in the United States,” Political Science Quarterly, 13 (03 1898), pp. 119–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cator, George, “Trust Companies in the United States,” in Johns Hopkins University Studies in Historical and Political Science (Baltimore, 1902).Google Scholar
Cooke, Thornton, “Branch Banking for the West and South,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 18 (11 1903), pp. 97113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowles, Alfred III, Common Stock Indexes (Bloomington, 1939).Google Scholar
Davis, Lance E., “The Investment Market, 1870–1914: The Evolution of a National Market” this JOURNAL, 25 (09 1965), pp. 355–99.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry, “Mortgage Interest Rates in the Populist Era,” American Economic Review, 74 (12 1984), pp. 9951015.Google Scholar
Fama, Eugene F., Foundations of Finance (New York, 1976).Google Scholar
Fama, Eugene F., and Miller, Merton H., The Theory of Finance (Hinsdale, IL, 1971).Google Scholar
Galai, Dan, and Masulis, Ronald W., “The Option Pricing Model and the Risk Factor of Stock,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (01/03 1976), appendix 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendreau, Brian, “The Risk Structure of Postbellum U.S. Deposit Rates” (Working paper, Morgan Trust Company, 12 1986).Google Scholar
Heinberg, John J., The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (Baltimore, 1926).Google Scholar
Hirshleifer, Jack, “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation: Comment,” Journal of Law and Economics, 19 (08 1976), pp. 241–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, A. T., and Mawhinney, Robert J., Laws of the United States Concerning Money, Banking and Loans, 1778–1909 (Washington, DC, 1910).Google Scholar
James, John A., “Banking Market Structure, Risk, and the Pattern of Local Interest Rates in the United States, 1893–1911,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 58 (11 1976), pp. 453–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, John A., “The Development of the National Money Market, 1893–1911,” this JOURNAL, 36 (12 1976), pp. 878–97.Google Scholar
Keehn, Richard H., and Smiley, Gene, “Mortgage Lending by National Banks,” Business History Review, 51 (Winter 1977), pp. 474–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, John Jay, “Letter to the Chairman of the Committee on Finance of the United States Senate,” in Report of the Committees of the Senate of the United States: First Session of the Forty-fourth Congress, No. 110 (Washington, DC, 1876).Google Scholar
Modigliani, Franco, and Miller, Merton H., “The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance, and the Theory of Investment,” American Economic Review, 48 (06 1958), pp. 261–97.Google Scholar
Odell, Kerry A., “The Integration of Regional and Interregional Capital Markets: Evidence from the Pacific Coast, 1883–1913,” this JOURNAL, 49 (06 1989), pp. 297310.Google Scholar
Peltzman, Sam, “Entry in Commercial Banking,” Journal of Law and Economics, 8 (10 1965), pp. 1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poor, Henry V., Manual of the Railroads of the United States (New York, various editions).Google Scholar
Pritchett, Jonathan, “The Risk Structure of Postbellum U.S. Deposit Rates: Comment” (Working paper, Tulane University, 12 1986).Google Scholar
SAS Institute, SAS/ETS User's Guide (Cary, NC, 1984).Google Scholar
Smiley, Gene, “Interest Rate Movement in the United States, 1888–1913,” this JOURNAL, 35 (09 1975), pp. 591620.Google Scholar
Smiley, Gene, “Banking Structure and the National Capital Market, 1869–1914: A Comment,” this JOURNAL, 45 (09 1985), pp. 653–59.Google Scholar
Snowden, Kenneth A., “Mortgage Rates and American Capital Market Development in the Late Nineteenth Century,” this JOURNAL, 47 (09 1987), pp. 671–91.Google Scholar
Sushka, Marie Elizabeth and Barrett, W. Brian, “Banking Structure and the National Capital Market, 1869–1914,” this JOURNAL, 44 (06 1984), pp. 463–77.Google Scholar
Sylla, Richard, “Federal Policy, Banking Market Structure, and Capital Mobilization in the United States, 1863–1913,” this JOURNAL, 29 (12 1969), pp. 657–86.Google Scholar
Sylla, Richard, The American Capital Market, 1869–1914 (New York, 1975).Google Scholar
U.S. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, The Dual Banking System in the United States (Washington, DC, 1932), p. 123.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of the United States (Washington, DC, 1872, 1883, 1895, 1902, and 1913).Google Scholar
White, Halbert, “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity,” Econometrica, 48 (05 1980), pp. 817–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, , Parker, H., American Banking (Chicago, 1921).Google Scholar