Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Spinning Jenny and the Industrial Revolution: A Reappraisal

  • Ugo Gragnolati (a1), Daniele Moschella (a2) and Emanuele Pugliese (a3)
Abstract

Why was the Industrial Revolution British? In a recent article published in this Journal, Robert Allen argues that only in England was the price of labor relative to capital high enough to justify the adoption of the labor-saving technologies which characterized the Industrial Revolution.1 To support his argument, he uses the spinning jenny as a case study. The jenny was indeed an important labor-saving technology that was invented and widely adopted in England but not in France. Allen explains this fact by calculating the returns to adopting the jenny in each country: according to his calculations the jenny was profitable in England but not in France.

The present note shows that Allen's conclusions rest on implausible profitability computations. In particular, Allen assumes that output remains constant after the adoption of the jenny while hours worked decrease dramatically. From a theoretical perspective, this is equivalent to an assumption that hours worked move inversely with the marginal product of labor. As soon as these restrictive assumptions are abandoned, the jenny turns out being profitable both in England and in France. Hence the mystery of the adoption of the jenny during the Industrial Revolution remains.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Allen Robert C. “The Industrial Revolution in Miniature: The Spinning Jenny in Britain, France, and India.” University of Oxford, Department of Economics, Economics Series Working Papers, No. 375, 2007.
Allen Robert C. The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009a.
Allen Robert C. “The Industrial Revolution in Miniature: The Spinning Jenny in Britain, France, and India.” The Journal of Economic History 69, no. 4 (2009b): 901–27.
Allen Robert C. “Why the Industrial Revolution was British: Commerce, Induced Innovation, and the Scientific Revolution.” Economic History Review, forthcoming.
De Vries Jan. “The Industrial Revolutionand the Industrious Revolution.” The Journal of Economic History 54, no. 2 (1994): 249–70.
Landes David. The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Economic History
  • ISSN: 0022-0507
  • EISSN: 1471-6372
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-economic-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 24
Total number of PDF views: 106 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 546 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.